HOME | DD
#author #authors #book #cons #fiction #flaws #indentification #overcoming #pros #storytellers #strengths #tutorial #types #weaknesses #writer #writers #writing #novel #josephblakeparker #anybodycanwriteanovel
Published: 2015-06-17 17:21:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 9581; Favourites: 176; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
body div#devskin0 hr { }
What Type of Writer Are You?
Chapter 9 “Types of Writers” – Section 1 “Self-identification”
With Links to Supplementary Material
While there are still a few topics in the genre section that I need more time to think about and research, I feel the need to take a break from it and move on to another section of major importance—Types of Writers. There are many types of writers—each separated by their motivation for writing. It is important to know what writing groups you fall into, so that you know your strengths, weaknesses, and can devise strategies so that your motivation can meet with your medium in order to create the best possible story. Today, I'm going to list the types that I will be later discussing, as well as giving readers the chance for input, in case I forget any of them. Remember that many writers will find themselves identifying with several groups, and that writers of any of these groups have the potential to create quality stories. Also, just because you find yourself in a group does not mean all pros or cons will apply to you--this article serves as a very simplified identification that we can use to later learn strategies for stacking up the pros and eliminating the cons that actually do apply to each of us.
Type 1: The Career Writer
If you have read and written all your life, and can dream of nothing else than becoming a published author that writes for a living, you are an aspiring Career Writer.
Pros: Singular dedication towards the craft gives you a leg up on style, marketing trends, and gaining reader interest. Some initial interest in learning and optimizing skills.
Cons: Economically difficult, and the singular focus on writing limits your opportunities for relevant real-life experiences. High temptation to focus on publishing instead of writing, reading, and learning.
Type 2: The Indie Writer
If your primary focus is on writing something totally original, in a style all your own—readers and critics be damned—then you are probably an Indie Writer.
Pros: A recent increase in interest in this writing style. Fewer creative limitations. Possibility of complete originality.
Cons: Low chance of literary success. So focused on originality, that you lose the power of traditional style. Stories often difficult to read. Writer often refuses to grow—viewing learning as conformist.
Type 3: The Marketing Writer
If you are being hired to create a story based on trending genres and story-types, you are likely a Market-based writer, working with a publishing team.
Pros: Economically sound career allows focus on the craft. Team of writers and editors and researchers at your disposal. High likelihood of success with audience.
Cons: Low level of originality. Team and Publishing company may limit your ability to infuse quality into your work. Little to no artistic control of stories. Less public recognition as an author.
Type 4: The Casual Writer
If you have a career and interests outside of writing, with storytelling being a hobby that you take particular interest in, you are likely a Causal Writer.
Pros: More experience in matters unrelated to writing, broadening what you can write about. Near-limitless time to work on developing your story and skills. No need for literary success. Much more open to learning about the craft of writing.
Cons: Must do more research into developing and learning writing skills. Less likely to write more than a few works.
Type 5: The Fan Writer
If you are the type of person who becomes interested in a show, book, movie, or other existing story and enjoys writing fan-fiction or in genres similar to those stories, you are likely a fan writer.
Pros: You read more than the average writer—teaching you many skills and strategies for your own story. You often see story flaws, and objectively know how to fix them. You possess a higher desire and willingness for learning.
Cons: A tendency for low self-esteem when it comes to original works. A focus on making your story similar to existing works and worlds. A lower likelihood to leave comfort zones, especially when it comes to writing stories that might be published.
Type 6: The Revolutionary Writer
If writing is a means to an end, a way of getting a message or enacting change, personal growth, and reform for the readers, then you are likely a Revolutionary Writer.
Pros: Greater depth inherent in every story you write. A willingness to learn if it means a higher chance of mission success. A great amount of mission-based dedication to writing.
Cons: Often comes across as sounding preachy. Difficulty not using subconscious manipulation of audience. Tendency to put the message before the story.
Type 7: The Niche Writer
If you have a very particular topic that you write about—often autobiographical in part—and are known for your work in that topic, you are likely a niche writer.
Pros: Ease in finding a niche of readers who have a similar interest. Great expertise in your topic of interest. Recognition for your expertise in a particular field.
Cons: Difficulty finding readers outside of your niche. Must find new ways to explore the same topic, or else become very repetitive—resulting in few returning readers.
Type 8: The Personal Writer
If you write primarily to express yourself, to explore your own interests, to deal with your own emotions, or to make a story just in the way you want, you are likely a Personal Writer.
Pros: Usually direct and honest in the reason for your writing. High motivation for continuing to write. Universal human experience will lead to many readers empathizing with your very emotional story.
Cons: Lower likelihood to learn new skills. Higher temptation to write in a way that is exclusive and difficult for your audience to understand. Difficulty accepting criticism because it feels like a personal attack.
Type 9: The Literary Writer
If you have an English or writing degree, or have read more than you fair share of classical literature that you consider the epitome of storytelling, you are likely a literary writer.
Pros: A higher than average grasp on storytelling, tools of writing, philosophy, and style. A great amount of reading experience. Analytic mind when it comes to writing.
Cons: Intellectual elitist attitude which lessens the likelihood of accepting criticism or learning from contemporary sources. Dry, slow, and haughty storytelling style. Belief that the best literature has already been written leads to low motivation for writing anything new.
Over the next few weeks, I will be looking at each of these types, and expounding on how each can overcome or work within their flaws, and maximize their advantages in order to create the best possible stories. Feel free to identify which group you belong to, in the comments, and discuss how you overcome the weaknesses you are prone to.
Feel free to comment with other suggested resources. Any questions about writing? Things you want me to discuss? Comment or send me a message and I will be glad to reply or feature my response in a later article. If you enjoy my reviews, please feel free to share my articles with friends, add it to your favorites, become a watcher on my page, or send send a llama my way!
Originally posted at www.facebook.com/JosephBlakePa… (Feel free to “Like” and subscribe)
And: josephblakeparker.wix.com/theb…
And: josephblakeparker.deviantart.c…
Related content
Comments: 121
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to ??? [2021-02-11 16:49:20 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Creepycutie324 In reply to DesdemonaDeBlake [2021-02-11 16:50:43 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Henkyo [2019-06-03 16:38:42 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm.... (thinking).... I think I'm pretty much of a Casual Writer or a Fan-Writer.
Also, Just for my opinion (on the part about "Originality").
Nothing in Books, Fiction, Anime, Video Games, and Reality is original (or completely original). They're just unique in there in own ways.
(Explaining how and why I think so or know for sure)
Because if they are original (or completely original), they wouldn't have any similarities or anything that is very generic, and they wouldn't be based on any similar concepts (like superpowers, characters, & etc) or anything that is based on we have in reality.
If you want to see for your self. I have collage of similar characters here in my sta.sh.
sta.sh/228ltie7upty?edit=1
I like your tutorials btw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to Henkyo [2019-06-09 00:34:55 +0000 UTC]
Oh yeah, I agree. I later did an entire blog about the nonexistence of originality. I plan to redraft all this so that all the information is updated and in line with what I've learned since first starting on all these tutorials. But I need to have a novel published before I'll feel justified in doing that. These tutorials are several years old now, I believe. And at the time of writing this, I hadn't really put much thought into originality. All that to say that yes, I agree with you.
9 Tips for Understanding Originality in Stories 9 Tips for Understanding Originality in Stories
Chapter 8 “From Story to Art” – Section 7 “Originality"
Anybody Can Write a Novel 2.0
(Previous Tutorial) (Next Tutorial)
Glad you like them
That collage is very impressive. It definitely strengthens your perspective on the matter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anonymous0010110 [2018-02-16 03:15:23 +0000 UTC]
I'm primarily a personal & fan writer with some indie writer traits. To be honest I actually I have a little bit of all the styles so I'm not quite sure what that makes me. All I know about it is I'm a writer. I love to write, & I have a strong passion for writing. Maybe for a career or not but write now it just makes me happy to write.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to Anonymous0010110 [2018-02-20 12:28:28 +0000 UTC]
Hey, sounds like good motivation to me
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Aevilregalswift1989 [2016-09-24 18:57:21 +0000 UTC]
Im a fan writer through Once upon a time. often find myself second guessing my skills and questioning my entire story. because have just discovered a love for writing my skills are VERY Under developed. but I am very much determined to soak up as much information as possible. so I can write well and develop incredible stories for everyone to enjoy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to Aevilregalswift1989 [2016-09-25 01:18:14 +0000 UTC]
That's awesome. Just know that it takes a bit of time, and don't be discouraged.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dracozombie [2016-01-29 19:40:53 +0000 UTC]
I'm primarily a fan and a casual writer, with a little indie thrown in there depending on the story -- one idea I'm working on might not work in a purely textual format, for instance. It'll most likely become a visual novel, if you know of them. I've only read one myself, and it focused more on the 'novel' part than the 'visual' part, which works for me since that was my aim as well. It might not be indie to the VN community (to them it's... just a VN), but visual novels might be seen as unusual to writers who are used to pure text. That is, when they're not seeing it as nothing but anime porn, which is sadly true in a lot of cases. Plus you won't be seeing them on a shelf in Barnes & Noble, which is disappointing, but I think what matters more is just getting the story I want to write written. If what I want to write functions better as a VN than a traditional novel, so be it.
I was aiming to be a career writer (English major here), but my writing output isn't anywhere close to something I could make a career off of, not to mention how story writing in general is financially unstable unless you're of the 0.001% of authors who make big bucks off their novels. Since I don't write enough to make a living off of, and since I need financial stability for my peace of mind, I wound up pursuing a different field entirely for my job and now I write on the side. I give props to the freelancers who can pull it off, because I can't. It'd be cool if it could be my career, but making it just a major hobby is liberating (it'd be even better if I could make at least a little profit off it). I'm not on any deadlines, and my financial status doesn't depend on whether or not people like my stuff. It's bad enough to hear people tear down your story, but when it also compromises your ability to pay your bills? I don't think my sanity could take it.
But fan writing is near and dear to my heart, and in some ways I have more passion for it than I have for my original works. Funny thing when it comes to writing fanfction: you go into it already having emotional attachment to the characters and the story and the setting. I'm so used to writing stories under the assumption that I and my readers already care about the characters, that when it comes to original works, I have to wrestle with my ability to write about characters I don't know yet and don't have a pre-established attachment to. After all, if you write for love, what happens when you're writing something of your own where love hasn't been fully cultivated yet? Forming your own attachment isn't easy to do when the love is half-baked because things aren't fully fleshed out enough for you to truly love them. Well, it can be easy -- original writers do it all the time -- but it's new territory for people like me who are so used to the love already being there, that they need to learn how to develop ideas without it.
I've been a fan writer since I could remember, before I even knew fanfiction was a thing. I spent, and still spend, a lot of time thinking about works that I love, and when I discovered fanfiction, it became a convenient and awesome way to indulge in that love. Fanfiction can definitely be a tool to improve your writing, but I also write fanfiction on its own merits, for its own sake, out of love. Of course, I also aim for quality, which is why I spend more time writing fanfiction instead of reading them these days. My standards have gotten too high, higher than what the average fan author produces. It's disappointing, but I already have an idea of what I want to read, so I might as well just write it myself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Paralelsky [2015-09-08 14:53:13 +0000 UTC]
I guess I'm a mix of fan writer (I have many fandoms I'm active in), casual writer (short pieces from a personal point of view) and marketing/ niche writer (I write scientific articles for journals and textbooks for my teaching job.) I really look forward to reading your tips on how to improve on each guise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DaniSW3 [2015-08-27 03:10:31 +0000 UTC]
I'm half causal half fan writer. I do it for the love of Star Wars and to have a hobby
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to DaniSW3 [2015-08-27 13:50:59 +0000 UTC]
Hey, that's an awesome reason
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WindySilver [2015-07-17 09:31:55 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty much a fan writer. Actually, when I looked at its cons, I did realize that it does fit me (I'm not 100 % sure about pros, though). I should go on and write more original stuff (I do have some in progress, but they've been on a break for some time), since I plan to become at least partly a career writer (translator probably is not included in marketing writer?).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to WindySilver [2015-07-17 15:15:56 +0000 UTC]
Well a translator is sort of a creative writer in and of themselves--just with very heavy creative boundaries to work within. I've done translation from English to Spanish and visa versa, and I discovered that there really isn't a way to translate with complete accuracy. Everything from culture to specific words don't translate very well, and a better translation will be one that better capture the plots, themes, characters, and ideas in a story and keeps them making sense for an audience of a different language and culture, rather than a translator that keeps as close tot he original technical meaning as possible. So I would definitely count a translator as a creative writer in their own right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WindySilver In reply to DesdemonaDeBlake [2015-07-17 16:04:26 +0000 UTC]
I noticed the same when I translated a couple of my fanfics from my native language to English in order to get them up here. It was a real pain to do though, so nowadays I write the stuff which comes here directly in English.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hachi-Fusami [2015-07-12 23:35:46 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting! I've never thought about it this way.
I'm definitely a mix of the casual and the fan writer. Writing is one of my hobbies and being a fan writer keeps me motivated to keep going and practicing. I might be a bit of a personal writer as well, but I tend to always get embarrassed by expressing anything too personal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to Hachi-Fusami [2015-07-14 15:43:43 +0000 UTC]
No worries Keep at it and you'll find the way to express yourself and your emotional journeys in life without making your stories in the least bit related to your own struggles--making it far less embarrassing. Just keep at it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DulceAna [2015-07-12 13:55:58 +0000 UTC]
Revolutionary writer...trying to balance messages with plot 😀
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to DulceAna [2015-07-14 15:41:24 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! And yes, I struggle with the same. My first drafts are SO preachy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dynsiwmper [2015-06-30 14:22:18 +0000 UTC]
I'm a casual writer. When I'm not writing, I'm a computer programmer. I seem to spend more time researching things than writing about them, and I can spend several months, if not years, playing with story ideas or gaining experiences that I can add to my stories. I find that I'm rather stuck in one genre though, so all my stories have a similar feel, probably because it's a formula that I've used and know works. I have many half finished and abandoned projects where I've tried to break into indie writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to dynsiwmper [2015-07-02 17:56:36 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the input! This will help with writing a few of my articles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1deathgod [2015-06-28 20:59:50 +0000 UTC]
I most identify with the personal writer. I do see a little of the revolutionary writer in me, but my main purpose in writing is to write the story in my head. If people learn something from it, that's just an added bonus. I don't however have an issue with criticism. I thrive on it. When people tell me my work is good I'm not learning how to make it better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to 1deathgod [2015-06-29 02:33:49 +0000 UTC]
That's awesome Being able to take criticism is probably one of the best skills a writer can have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PoesDaughter [2015-06-28 05:45:27 +0000 UTC]
I'm 1, 5, and 9.
I went to school just to learn how to be a writer, so while I'm an English professor now, writing fiction is my first and foremost activity. But I love doing fan stuff too. It's good practice, and the best part is you don't feel this unbearable pressure to make it good. You can just have fun with it, and I've found that quite liberating in a lot of ways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to PoesDaughter [2015-06-29 02:32:49 +0000 UTC]
I've noticed that about fan fiction. I mean, I don't write it, but I do think about how existing stories could have been so much better and have the occasional urge to rewrite the script--seems like it would be fun. It also seems to me like a valuable lesson in editing and the power one has in having enough distance from the story in order to edit it effectively. I can edit a professionally done movie, but I can't see simple and super-obvious mistakes in my own works and characters, haha.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PoesDaughter In reply to DesdemonaDeBlake [2015-06-29 17:41:11 +0000 UTC]
Fan-fiction makes me think of a story I heard about Nathaniel Hawthorne. Supposedly, he essentially locked himself away for something like 7 years, doing nothing but writing. When his self-imposed isolation came to an end, he promptly set everything he'd written on fire. His reasoning? He didn't want the world to see all of that crap. That was his time perfecting his style and technique, and much of it was awkward, pretentious, and all around bad.
I think of fan-fiction like that. It's my time to, like Hawthorne, get my crap out and perfect my style and technique. I didn't actually set out to learn something with it. I was in grad school, and every creative work we produced was expected to be Canon-worthy. That is an awful lot of pressure, my friend. It had gotten so hard that I wasn't enjoying writing like I used to. So, by chance I happened to be reading some fan-fic online, and I noticed that most of it was not very good. Shocking, I know LOL I wondered how it would look like if someone who'd been classically trained to write attempted it. So, I just started just to satisfy my own curiosity and to have a bit of fun. It was great because it could be completely stupid, and no one would think anything about it. All fan-fic is stupid.
But, I did wind up learning how to add more layers to an initial story. In fact, most of what I've learned has been in the development department. I guess the biggest thing is that it's allowed me to practice and it's allowed me to get the suck out. Now, I've started my post-apocalyptic/dystopian novel, and I feel like it's going much better than when I first attempted it several years ago.
I think it's always easier to edit or develop a professional movie than it is to do it to your own work. You're much closer to your own work, you've nursed it and coddled it and watched it grow from infancy, so you're more attached to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to PoesDaughter [2015-07-02 17:50:36 +0000 UTC]
That is really cool, I'd not heard that story about Nathaniel Hawthorne. I can't say that I would have had the self-control to go to that extreme. But fanfiction does seem like an excellent alternative.
Thanks for the great amount of input in your comment. It will help me greatly for when I write the chapter on tips for fan writers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PoesDaughter In reply to DesdemonaDeBlake [2015-07-02 20:15:08 +0000 UTC]
Hawthorne was definitely the man
And, you're welcome. I enjoy trading ideas.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iOakly [2015-06-22 16:51:36 +0000 UTC]
I'm Type 2,5 and 7
Yeah.... I change my writing styles *sometimes*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SoraYuy [2015-06-22 08:24:45 +0000 UTC]
I'm a type 4: Casual Writer and 8: Personal Writer with hits of the 5: Fan Writer while trying to become a 1: Career Writer. Your tutorials have been a great help in my attempt to actually finish one of my novels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to SoraYuy [2015-06-22 19:03:42 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! I am glad to hear that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nocturnaliss [2015-06-21 15:37:09 +0000 UTC]
I guess I'm mostly an 8. I don't really know XD I write because I love to write and immerse myself in other places and other people (I write fantasy). I do like criticism though, as I want to grow as a writer, and especially considering I write in English, which is my third language. So... I dunno really what type I am XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to Nocturnaliss [2015-06-22 19:06:14 +0000 UTC]
Could be multiple or none of the above, haaha But it's good that you know your motivation, and especially good that you like criticism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nocturnaliss In reply to DesdemonaDeBlake [2015-06-23 06:18:20 +0000 UTC]
Criticism can be hard to accept sometimes, but as long as it's meant to help improve and not to crush one's spirit, I'm all for it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MakingFunOfStuff [2015-06-19 04:25:41 +0000 UTC]
Interesting way to put it. These are pretty accurate XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DesdemonaDeBlake In reply to MakingFunOfStuff [2015-06-19 15:32:32 +0000 UTC]
Awesome, glad to hear that they're not wildly wrong, haha Thanks for the feedback
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>