HOME | DD
Dont--Tread--On--Me β Republican
Published: 2009-01-07 01:48:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 1523; Favourites: 41; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Club submission by ~Ramen27
Favorite/comment here: [link]
Related content
Comments: 32
Yes, because red states don't take more welfare money than blue states. Oh wait, they do.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm liberal, but I honestly believe that really only people with mental and physical disabilities should be on welfare. They are the ones who actually need it.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Wheather or not if I can get on welfare, I'm not gonna be a fucking liberal. If I do get on welfare, I'm using it to get me help until I get back on track not use it because I don't want a job.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not everyone can be a militaristic asshole either trololol
π: 0 β©: 1
Your probably just butthurt your not manly enough for for killing arabs.
π: 0 β©: 1
How manly do you have to be to kill arabs? Sounds pretty hardcore bro
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, some of us are trying to be vastly and unnecessarily wealthy over here!
π: 0 β©: 1
The concept of being "unnecessarily wealthy" is the most authoritarian concept you can have.
By saying that, you are trying to politically force YOUR perspective onto others about how much wealth YOU think is acceptable.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, most american citizens agree by virtue of being american citizens to be governed. If I am able to force my perspective on others politically odds are I would have managed to get a majority of american voters to agree with me.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's why more people need to speak out against Bernie.
π: 0 β©: 1
They do. With their money. They're called lobbyists. You know, like Monsanto, or that guy who wanted to privatize water.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're full of it.
Bernie is backed by huge corporations, including Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Alphabet Inc. to name a few.
Trump is self funded, and only funds himself. Not to mention that he speaks ideas that are correct but are taboo to even Ted Cruz.
Bernie Sanders is an evil man; he supports Socialism, has praised Fidel Castro, and has no idea what he is doing.
π: 0 β©: 2
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
www.opensecrets.org/politicianβ¦
www.politico.com/story/2016/10β¦
Sorry hun', but Ad Hominem fallacy doesn't work in the face of reality and facts.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
1. Now that you're cornered, you're trying to change the subject.
The original topic was if Bernie Sanders was financed by big corporations or not; now that I proved that he was a corporate candidate you are trying to change the subject.
Yes, I know he isn't a candidate anymore; that wasn't the point, or the subject.
2. Both of those links are clickable on my end, so it's either a problem with your computer; or you're full of it.
Neither of which are out of the realms of possibility, since you tried to change the subject of an argument when you were put in a corner to try and skip the fact that I completely debunked your claim.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
1. Your original comment reads "That's painfully untrue. You know nothing -_-". You are claiming that I am wrong for saying that Bernie Sanders is a corporate candidate. He is probably the biggest corporate candidate of this race next to Hillary Clinton.
2. Lol, you told me in your initial comment "You know nothing"; so now you are attacking ME for saying that you are full of it for being intellectually dishonest. You didn't even have any substance to your argument, and I used rational reasoning and facts to support my claim.
3. You said "That's painfully untrue. You know nothing -_-", so when you say "I claimed nothing other than you were mostly wrong"; you are misrepresenting your original stance.
4. Nice of you to call me an "Asshole" when I have been nothing but neutral towards you. Do you only have Ad Hominem fallacy to overcompensate for your lack of facts and reasoning? Or are you just conditioned to insulting peoples' character because it works it generally silences dissent in your echochamber?
So weak and pathetic that you need to block people because they get you in a corner. Keep to your safe space if you don't want dissent snowflake.
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't see how anything you said is a direct response to what I said. I mean naturally there are also lobbyists for Bernie Sanders as well as against him.
Trump funds his campaign through his company, there's a difference. Also I don't think I've really heard Trump say anything taboo that anyone else hasn't said, aside from some wild claims that he wouldn't be able to back up. To be honest a majority of the time he flip-flops on his opinions from one interview to the next.
if we're talking about indications of evil. While Bernie Sanders could say good things about Fidel Castro in the same way that one can say good things about anyone ever, Trump himself has been compared to Hitler.
π: 0 β©: 1
Trump independently finances his campaign, and give an example of his "flip-flop".
The comparisons made about Trump to Hitler were all made by extremist progressives who have an agenda (I.E. the original creator of that meme is a Muslim)
π: 0 β©: 1
you give me an example of Trump's leanings that hasn't been a blanket statement he couldn't really back up.
Everyone has an agenda. Trump, like Hitler, is prideful and charismatic and plays to a jingoistic crowd who feels they have an elitist's right to the country.
π: 0 β©: 1
1. Donald Trump stating that Mexican illegal immigrants are criminals. I chose this because it's the FIRST thing he said that gained notoriety; and he's right. Think about it. The fact that they came here ILLEGALLY makes them criminals to begin with.
2. Okay, you all seriously need to stop comparing Trump to Hitler; I've seen the comparisons you progressives have made and needless to say all of those points are less than accurate.
3. There's your inner cultural marxist. "If someone is conservative; they're an elitist!"
4. Anti-Trump people, BernieSanders supporters, and Black Lives Matter are all terrorists. They used violence for political motivation; that is the textbook definition of terrorism. And by not condemning the actions of the rally terrorists; the others in those movements are just as responsible for their terrorism.
π: 0 β©: 1
Mexican illegal immigrants were criminals before he said it. They are often caught and deported if they aren't hunted down by border patrol before they even reach the country. He's also said that most of them are rapists. I'm assuming with that in mind he meant that being from mexico and being an illegal immigrant automatically makes you an amoral and bad person. and yet I'M being called out for MY fallacies.
Why am I more than one person now? Is it because if you other a set of ideas and ideals it makes it easier on your conscience to not even try to understand any other ideology than your own?
You're saying that I'm violent BECAUSE of my ideals but you are very swift to infer that I am a terrorist and therefore BELONG IN JAIL because I disagree with you. That seems both close-minded and fascistic. Do these seem like the attributes of a reasonable person to you? While on a personal level I wouldn't advocate violence for the sake of political means, the first rally in which violence was used that I can think of have been Trump's, in which people who are not fanatically cheering are thrown out with torrents of bestial bellows and shoving.
I won't say that there aren't some supporters of Bernie Sanders aren't too rowdy, and I'd offer an apology if I could to anyone whose been hurt that wasn't starting a fight to begin with on either side. But I will say that thinking one side is more innocent than the other, or that even a conversation such as this isn't one in which both parties should CALM DOWN, I would say I would be a hypocrit.
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, I am done here; you clearly aren't willing to listen to me.
And for the record, the "protestors" threw the first punch. Therefore instigated it.
No one said they're wrong, which makes the members of BLM who weren't there just as responsible
π: 0 β©: 1
You called me a terrorist and I'M not willing to listen to YOU?
In that particular instance they did but there have been many instances of Trump's supporters being violent and no one had spoken out against them either.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, BLM/Bernie Sanders supporters are terrorists because they use violence for a political message.
Trump supporters were defending themselves; proof:Β www.youtube.com/watch?v=GepGO6β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeYTpz⦠Using violence for a political message. I hope Birmingham's trump rally terrorists have been properly spoken too in the same fashion I am being spoken too and accused of the same things I am.
π: 0 β©: 1
The Young Turks is far left propaganda.
π: 0 β©: 1
PaulΒ Joseph Watson seems like far right propaganda so...
π: 0 β©: 1
...Except for the fact that he is a libertarian from the UK who backs up all of his cited evidence for his claims.
π: 0 β©: 1
Technically everyone who makes a video reacting to an event from which they have footage would technically be citing their sources even if they discuss them through the lens of their own opinions. Β Perhaps "far right" was the wrong term but propaganda it remains. Something that paints a disruption at a political rally of that magnitude without touching on the nature of what is being discussed and the reaction in generated, oversimplifying it for the sake of demonizing the opposition is propaganda, especially when it ignores the fact that fights and disruptions have been set as a precedent, which is what my video proved.
π: 0 β©: 1
1. He cites articles, evidence, and factual statistics/historical documents as evidence. Propaganda implies that the information is false, or manipulative in nature.
2. So basically what you're saying is that ONE guy at a Trump rally punching someone in the face (Who didn't even have affiliation with Trump by the way) is justification for acts of domestic terrorism at rallies weeks/ months in the future?
Nonsense.
π: 0 β©: 0
