HOME | DD

DontNeedFeminism β€” Screaming 'Privilege' Doesn't Change That

#antifeminism #awareness #feminism #issues #male #men #privilege #problems #suicide #veteran #prostatecancer #maleprivilege
Published: 2015-06-13 07:55:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 24567; Favourites: 612; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description Men have problems. Women have problems. Men and women are people. People should matter equally.

Now why is that so hard to understand? Feminists are quick to counter any mention of men's issues with "b-but male privilege!" As if that diminishes the severity of men's issues, including:

-high suicide rates
-low access to domestic violence shelters
-increasing numbers of high school and university dropouts
-prostate cancer
-overwhelming majority of the homeless population
-longer prison sentences
-anti-male bias in family and divorce courts
-huge majority of workplace deaths
-majority of veterans suffering from PTSD
-and much, much more.

Does "male privilege" make those problems go away? Do they not matter just because women have problems, too, which feminists deem automatically worse because 'patriarchy'? Screaming "privilege" doesn't help the veteran about to kill himself because the family courts took his children from him. Screaming "privilege" just lets feminists get away with ignoring him.

And even if privilege did negate people's problems, most of the feminists screaming 'privilege' should just shut up because they're white and have "white privilege" and black people have it worse.

Yes, I know, "intersectionality," "power politics," "oppression of women," other buzzwords yada yada yada. But feminists crashing conferences about the male suicide epidemic, shutting down shelters for men, and throwing a hissy fit when a Men and Boys focus team is proposed to address dropout rates isn't helping anyone at all.

And no, you can't just blame it on the "patriarchy."



If you block me, I'm hiding your comments.
Related content
Comments: 537

sabaiism In reply to ??? [2017-10-21 08:42:59 +0000 UTC]

drain ya fucking attitude bitch

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-10-31 06:04:35 +0000 UTC]

Is that your only response left, now? Why do you feminists suck at this so hard? Oh wait, I know! It's because you've never been seriously challenged before, most people just let you bulldoze your opinions on them, laugh it off, and forget about it. So of course you buckle almost immediately someone actually challenges your position.

It'd be hiliarious if it wasn't for the fact that feminists control the sexism narrative in the West.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-10-31 16:26:18 +0000 UTC]

It's not a fact LMAOOOO there was even a study in England telling us most people weren't feminists so like i said DRAIN YA DAMN ATTITUDE YOU BITCH

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-03 05:43:01 +0000 UTC]

Just because someone doesn't personally identify as a feminist doesn't mean that they don't believe in the feminist narrative. At the end of the day, that narrative is the real problem, so to take a leaf from your book: Drain your victim narrative, bitch.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-03 16:12:56 +0000 UTC]

Drain ur victim status bitch & dont use that word if ur male lmao

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-04 02:25:38 +0000 UTC]

Alright, how 'bout I start calling you a cunt?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-04 21:38:07 +0000 UTC]

how about ur 28 year old ass leave

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-05 01:37:03 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, we seem to have an internet badass over here! What are you're gonna do, block me? I'm shaking in my boots! (sarcasm)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-05 09:17:00 +0000 UTC]

1. internet badass memes are so dead theyve decomposed already
2. wasnt it u who said u were gonna grab a minor by hte pussy or what

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-05 12:10:07 +0000 UTC]

1. I don't care, I'll still use 'em because you're whole "ancient meme" shit has about as much substance as a Twinky.

2. Source, please.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-05 13:50:32 +0000 UTC]

you genuinely sound like youve come out of 2009 4chan

it was on a deleted deviation i made idk

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-05 23:21:37 +0000 UTC]

"you genuinely sound like youve come out of 2009 4chan"

You genuinely sound like you've lost the argument but you're trying your damnedest to win, somehow.

"it was on a deleted deviation i made idk"

Ah, so it was just me making a joke that would piss you off or something to that effect. Typical SJW to take what I say outta context.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-06 15:51:59 +0000 UTC]

'IT WAS A JOKE!!1!'Β 

you know you could be jailed for being 18+ and saying that to a minor, rite....

also SJWs dont exist lmao

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-17 21:29:30 +0000 UTC]

"you know you could be jailed for being 18+ and saying that to a minor, rite...."

Only because I'm male. If I was a woman and said that I'd probably get a slap on the wrist at worst. You think on that next time you wanna say how women are suppossedly oppressed.

"also SJWs dont exist lmao"

Yes, they do. I'm talking to one right now.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-17 22:23:14 +0000 UTC]

and it's somehow... my fault? that you're a poor, tragic victim now?

the problem isn't feminism, it's society thinking women are incapable of being the abuser. stop using feminism to trivalise pedophilia, holy shit!!!

anyway women are oppressed anyway? like men are inherently privileged over women?

SJWs don't exist. u just use that term to silence people who you don't agree with.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-11-20 23:16:30 +0000 UTC]

"and it's somehow... my fault? that you're a poor, tragic victim now?"

Typical SJW hearing only what she wants to hear.

"the problem isn't feminism, it's society thinking women are incapable of being the abuser."

An idea that Feminism is all too glad to perpetuate. Making a category of sexual assault (not rape, mind you) named "Made to penetrate" (basically female-on-male rape, but it's not classified as rape because then the numbers would reveal that women aren't disproportionately affected by rape), promoting the Duluth model (which basically assumes to the male is guilty in a domestic violence case, even if he's the only one that's injured), and promoting the idea that women never lie about rape (despite nearly every rape case brought up in the media turning out to be false allegations) are just a few examples of this.

"stop using feminism to trivalise pedophilia, holy shit!!!"

Aren't feminists and SJWs the ones who are promoting the idea of pedophilia being an legitmate sexuality?

"anyway women are oppressed anyway? like men are inherently privileged over women?"

No, they're not. You would realize that if you stopped ignoring every disadvantage men face as "privilege backfiring" and every advantage women have as "benevolent sexism".

"SJWs don't exist. u just use that term to silence people who you don't agree with."

Yeah, I'm silencing you by not blocking you, getting you banned from dA, getting you fired from your job, or anything else that would actually qualify as me silencing you.

You've got a really terrible case of the victim complex there.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-11-21 16:08:14 +0000 UTC]

uhhhhh yea white feminists like lena dunham and amy schumer are willing to perpetuate that but to this day ive never seen a feminist who supports those??? intersectional feminists stand up for men (intersectional lmao) but honestly the lie that feminists are ignoring the fact that men are abused/raped is like so annoying now bc it just seems like non-feminists (like me) are trying to demonise feminists and honestly, y'all say feminists are rape apologists and compare THEM to nazis but like,,,, cry if a feminist makes a joke abt white/het/male/cis ignorance???? idgi

"Aren't feminists and SJWs the ones who are promoting the idea of pedophilia being an legitmate sexuality?"

no???? ''''pedosexuality'''' has like nothing to do with SJ??? the majority of ''''pedosexuals'''' i've met are literally anti-sjws lmao you tried it though, you did.

and yea men literally are inherently privileged/oppressive for being male :L i've never heard the time 'privilege backfiring' or 'benevolent sexism' used EVER omd ))))))) like it seems like y'all are projecting really hard ))))))) privilege isnt always political also bc ur type seem 2 think so lmao

silencing doesnt mean that exactly??? like ur saying 'drowning in 3ft of water doesnt count as drowning, it's only if the water is 6ft and filled with acid' like sweaty ? u dont have to get someone fired or banned to silence them ????

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-20 02:29:18 +0000 UTC]

"uhhhhh yea white feminists like lena dunham and amy schumer are willing to perpetuate that but to this day ive never seen a feminist who supports those?"

Except for the ones you mentioned...

Or, are they just not feminists because they're white?

"intersectional feminists stand up for men (intersectional lmao) but honestly the lie that feminists are ignoring the fact that men are abused/raped is like so annoying now bc it just seems like non-feminists (like me) are trying to demonise feminists and honestly, y'all say feminists are rape apologists and compare THEM to nazis but like,,,, cry if a feminist makes a joke abt white/het/male/cis ignorance???? idgi"

Geez, is it asking too much to organize your thoughts a little? I'll break down this mess of a "sentence" as I can.

So, your contention here seems to be that anti-feminists demonize feminists by arguing that they ignore male victims of rape/abuse yet will complain when feminist demonize white cis men, which is hypocritical.

Unfortunately, the problem with your argument is the fact that I gave three different examples of feminists ignoring male victimization, so it isn't a mere claim as you're suggesting, it's a reality.

"no???? ''''pedosexuality'''' has like nothing to do with SJ??? the majority of ''''pedosexuals'''' i've met are literally anti-sjws lmao you tried it though, you did."

Link one article written by an anti-SJW that's in favor of pedophilia being part of the LGBT community, because I can do the same with SJWs.

"and yea men literally are inherently privileged/oppressive for being male :L"

Ah, so I'm inherently evil simply for being born with a dick and any issues I face due to my maleness are simply not issues because you say so.

So, you've proven yourself to be an absolute monster.

"i've never heard the time 'privilege backfiring' or 'benevolent sexism' used EVER omd ))))))) like it seems like y'all are projecting really hard )))))))"

Just because you personally haven't heard of feminists using such terms doesn't mean they haven't. It ain't my fault you're ignorant.

"privilege isnt always political also bc ur type seem 2 think so lmao"

You clearly don't understand what politics are.

"silencing doesnt mean that exactly??? like ur saying 'drowning in 3ft of water doesnt count as drowning, it's only if the water is 6ft and filled with acid' like sweaty ? u dont have to get someone fired or banned to silence them ????"

You don't have to get someone banned or fired, but you do have to prevent someone from speaking, which is something I'm clearly not doing. Hell, I ain't even blocking you.

Just because I'm dismantling every one of your arguments doesn't mean I'm silencing you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-20 15:06:42 +0000 UTC]

ITS BEEN LIKE A MONTH IM CRYING???? like why did you respond so late??? ASHSJDHA

okay one, feminists who are white are feminists, Whiteβ„’Β feminists aren't feminists
lena dunham + amy schumer are the least platformed, least payed attention to, least supported Whiteβ„’Β feministsΒ in existance like no good feminist will ever platform Whiteβ„’ feminists and no good feminist will ever platform l*na dunham and amy sch*mer

two, you literally wrote a two foot long comment in response to mine, you can't talk ✌🏽. but moving on, i can link like 20 examples of anti-SJWs crying at jokes about the majority but lit not giving 2 asses about when they do it to minority bruh............... bruh.................. bruh............

do it and ill consider bitch im tired as fuck, link me a sjw who rubbed their greasy mitts over the lgbtqa community with pedophilia

"Ah, so I'm inherently evil simply for being born with a dick and any issues I face due to my maleness are simply not issues because you say so."
that's not what i said At All? one, not all men are born with a dicc, & idk how many times i have to tell u to not talk explicitly sexual to minors but.. okay

two: theyre issues but im not commenting on them bc im not a man and idk abt that bruh......

three Are You Le Triggered Perhaps

and about the politics thing?? i dont even understand where u coming fromhhhhhhhhh
us cis are privileged AND oppressive bc we oppress noncis ppl, and are viewed as the norm in society
poc arent inherently privileged or oppressive but can be (anti semitism, islamphobia, sexism, etc)
women arent inherently privileged or oppressive but can be (transphobes, homophobes, racist, etc)
not everyone is a politician Harold

Go away

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-27 11:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Go to hell, cunt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-29 16:33:07 +0000 UTC]

IM STILL FUCKIN SHOOKT BY THIS AHDHSN WHAT WERE YOU THINKING

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 01:17:59 +0000 UTC]

You think waaay too highly of yourself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 11:10:09 +0000 UTC]

ASHDHNAJDJSDKJK
'GO TO HELL CUINT'BM KFJKGLN;;FN

JESU S C H R I ST ive won thats the rule, go home

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 11:21:58 +0000 UTC]

And yet you're the only one going apeshit right now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 11:22:42 +0000 UTC]

nah im just laughing @ u rn B D E C AUSE WHS T THE FUCMK

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 21:15:04 +0000 UTC]

Oh right, you're "laughing". Suuure.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 23:06:13 +0000 UTC]

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ yh πŸ™Œ tbh x πŸ’•

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2018-01-01 23:46:33 +0000 UTC]

I broke the feminist, again.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2018-01-01 23:49:30 +0000 UTC]

Bruh sad πŸ˜‚πŸ˜­ like its midnight I'm just trying to get a lil sleep πŸ˜’πŸ’ž xx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2018-01-02 03:27:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh, boo hoo.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2018-01-02 10:30:29 +0000 UTC]

Blud im serious..... do you have a life x

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-27 12:14:32 +0000 UTC]

OMGSHSSHSJSHSJ
how about actually addressing my argument instead of calling ppl slurs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-27 23:42:33 +0000 UTC]

You have no arguments to address.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-28 10:35:45 +0000 UTC]

did.... did you read my past comment?... or...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 01:15:23 +0000 UTC]

You clearly didn't read any of mine.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 11:11:00 +0000 UTC]

i... i did..

also whats w you replying so late to all my comments? its clear ur online from ur profile

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 11:29:10 +0000 UTC]

There's a difference between simply seeing the words and actually reading the message.

As for replying late, sometimes I just don't feel like replying in a timely fashion. Talking to a brick wall that stopped being funny several replies ago will do that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 11:30:17 +0000 UTC]

look at me im crapcarp and im still using excuses i used two months ago to ignore literally anything that was told to me ooooh ohhh im crapcarp oooooh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-12-31 21:20:06 +0000 UTC]

You're not even thinking at all at this point, are you? Wait, that's giving you too much credit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-12-31 23:05:32 +0000 UTC]

Naw πŸ™Œ πŸ’•

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2018-01-01 23:46:12 +0000 UTC]

I knew it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2018-01-01 23:48:04 +0000 UTC]

Rip but iss almost midnight πŸ˜‚
You're the one bringin this Shit into 2018 πŸ˜£πŸ˜‚

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2018-01-01 23:51:04 +0000 UTC]

I have a feeling that trying to understand your "point" here would be damaging.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2018-01-01 23:52:26 +0000 UTC]

Innit x I mean I'm not the one crying meself to sleep over this so... Mad tingz blud πŸ˜­πŸ˜‚ x

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2018-01-02 03:28:27 +0000 UTC]

Aren't you the one complaining about not getting any sleep?

If anyone's crying, it's you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2018-01-02 15:24:47 +0000 UTC]

mate im not even crying and also i literally never said anythin abt sleep BLUD innit mad tingz mate awryt x

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sabaiism In reply to ??? [2017-10-16 13:42:39 +0000 UTC]

um sweaty...........im tryingt o thigk of a cool wity reply but im........literally feeling so much...., Secondhand Embarrassment rn....., imjus t.....so ashamed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-10-18 21:46:08 +0000 UTC]

Bitch, please. You're fooling no one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sabaiism In reply to Crapcarp [2017-10-19 09:26:00 +0000 UTC]

ur so embarrassing
ur the reason everyone hates antisjws and antifeminists lmfao nice misogyny btw

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to sabaiism [2017-10-19 21:08:40 +0000 UTC]

Is this all you got? Pathetic. I mean, I don't expect much from feminists but you can't come up with decent insults.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>