HOME | DD

Published: 2009-05-11 01:13:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 20894; Favourites: 205; Downloads: 2547
Redirect to original
Description
A large bead sprite of Wolverine from the from the Marvel comic series X-Men.. Contains 23,188 beads.Related content
Comments: 83
Eskhata [2014-03-20 17:43:35 +0000 UTC]
Looks really really cool! I wonder how big this one is and did you use some kind of program to get the picture into bead pixels?
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to Eskhata [2014-03-20 23:19:04 +0000 UTC]
It's a standard 36x24 poster size, 187x124 - 23,188 beads total. No program, drew Wolverine pixel by pixel using the original artwork as a reference underlay and a set palette based on available bead colors, then did a 10-20 tolerance fill on the background with various shades of red.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eskhata In reply to DrOctoroc [2014-03-21 20:51:28 +0000 UTC]
ThatΒ΄s so neat, good work! Thanks for the info, sounds like hard work by doing it pixel by pixel and not using any help-programme. Did you actually print the reference onto paper and had it under the transparent beadplates?
I also wonder if this is the melted side or the unmelted side (cant figure from the photo)? Do you usually use the melted side as the mainside? I also into making bead sprites but I have only done smaller ones so far.. I was looking around here on dA of bead sprites done by people and noticed that people show their finished work by showing the melted side? I have always thought that the unmelted side is the mainside, do you know if IΒ΄m totally wrong or is it just a matter of taste?
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to Eskhata [2014-03-22 04:56:16 +0000 UTC]
No, I did it on the computer in Photoshop and completed the pattern before I beaded it.
Melted or unmelted is a preference for most. I know a lot of people who bead large sprites backwards so they can focus on getting everything to fuse together without having to worry about consistency, then flipping it to either have the unmelted beads be the displayed side or then fuse the other side more gracefully. I personally prefer to melt both sides but for a piece this big, I leave the back side melted, since it can warp in funny ways during ironing so only doing one side makes it easier to avoid the melting. The consistency can be tricky but with hundreds of bead sprites under my belt (iron?) I developed a few techniques that made it easier, one of which involves ironing one section at a time and removing the plates from previous sections as I move along. This way, as the beads cool and contract, they don't get caught on the pegs. Another trick is to rub your finger over the beads between the fused and unfused sections to loosen the ones that haven't quite fused yet. Otherwise, they could break off during the ironing of the next section and fall sideways and ruin the whole piece.
π: 0 β©: 1
Eskhata In reply to DrOctoroc [2014-03-23 20:56:05 +0000 UTC]
Ah okay, thatΒ΄s what I first thought also but then it sounded more like you printed it onto paper (but I guess that would work also, even if it probably would be more work in general).
Thanks a bunch for the information and your personal hints!
I am going to start making my first large bead sprite as soon as I have fully decided which one to make (of my alternatives I have) and gotten all the colors I need for it. On the small bead
sprites I have done so far I have always bead the sprites backwards and had the unmelted side to be the displayed side (as you also mentioned).. I guess I will go with the same thing with the large one also.
I hope it turns out well and I will keep your methods/hints in my mind while making it.
π: 0 β©: 0
PixelSculptures [2012-03-11 14:28:22 +0000 UTC]
I know a guy who would flip over this x-men series you've done. I'm flipping enough just thinking about the work on this.
π: 0 β©: 0
jewlecho [2011-11-03 05:40:01 +0000 UTC]
I have to say that that is absolutely ridiculous...
And I mean that in the good way! lol
π: 0 β©: 0
crazyantman1 [2011-09-02 04:06:27 +0000 UTC]
This is...CRAZY AS SHIT omg it must have took forever kudos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! looks amazing also!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
ADE-Syndicate [2011-08-04 02:02:31 +0000 UTC]
The thumbnail looked more like a painting. Amazing!
π: 0 β©: 0
THEsquiddybum [2011-08-01 13:06:47 +0000 UTC]
that is the most badass thing ive seen like ever!
π: 0 β©: 0
Lophiomyinae [2011-02-14 09:05:44 +0000 UTC]
Jeepers... That's insane! And it only took you two days?
π: 0 β©: 0
BunnyTreasures [2011-01-26 16:10:45 +0000 UTC]
You are crazy! in a good way though!! LOVE this!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Agent-Sideways-8 [2010-10-09 04:42:40 +0000 UTC]
What the hell?! Do you own the fucking perler bead company?! How many pegboards do you own?! How the hell do you afford the 100,000+ beads you've used?!
π: 0 β©: 0
davideatspoo [2010-01-25 03:39:11 +0000 UTC]
I could never imagine how much time was put into that
π: 0 β©: 0
ShawnSPeters [2010-01-14 22:27:20 +0000 UTC]
Holy shit, that is awesome!! I especially love how you did the reflection in the claws. Amazing.
π: 0 β©: 0
jadestonethedragon [2010-01-14 21:44:57 +0000 UTC]
23,188... you... you didn't count all those, did you? O.o
But this (and all your works) is really impressive, especially how you shade them.
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to jadestonethedragon [2010-01-14 23:13:21 +0000 UTC]
Haha, no, Photoshop has a pixel-counting feature - I do that for all of my pieces.
π: 0 β©: 1
molnflygare [2010-01-14 19:38:21 +0000 UTC]
The patience, the dexterous, and that you actually now the exact number of beads that you've used makes this totally insane. As not to talk about your artistic skills, this really looks like Wolverine! I'm stunned, such as any others must be when they look upon your unique work!
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to molnflygare [2010-01-14 19:47:29 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, but the real credit must go to the original artist. This is not an entirely original pixel piece and, while I did hand-pixel it and choose the colors as per the bead color palette, it was more of a trace. But yeah, I'll take full credit for the beading part, haha.
π: 0 β©: 1
molnflygare In reply to DrOctoroc [2010-01-18 19:32:32 +0000 UTC]
Can you find the original artist on DeviantART?
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to molnflygare [2010-01-18 19:39:43 +0000 UTC]
I believe the original was done by a professional artist who did the art for a Marvel Masterpiece set. I found the image in a Google image search but could not find the original artist mentioned anywhere, so I'm assuming it's official artwork.
π: 0 β©: 0
tira-chan [2010-01-14 09:19:22 +0000 UTC]
Just found your gallery thru your DD pic of Sakura~
And I have to ask~
How do you put these things together when they're so big??
It's those little "perler" beads that you have to iron to melt/set them together right?? I remember doing those as a kid, but they were about as big as a coaster. I can't imagine how someone can do one that's 24" x 36" o_O
thanks for your time~!
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to tira-chan [2010-01-14 20:03:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, they're Perler (and a few other brands - Hama and PhotoPearls). It definitely becomes very frustrating when you get into the larger pieces, since the beads can warp and contract with the heating and cooling down. It just takes some good planning of which sections to iron first, and placing some weights on the already ironed portions to keep things in place.
π: 0 β©: 0
radtastical [2009-05-31 04:39:02 +0000 UTC]
holy crap, that's insane. From the thumbnail, I thought it was a digital painting. that's so awesome.
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to radtastical [2009-05-31 14:56:15 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I love the large scale stuff cause in the right lighting, it looks like a painting!
π: 0 β©: 1
radtastical In reply to DrOctoroc [2009-05-31 16:51:54 +0000 UTC]
you're welcome! and yeah, you're right! haha, it does look like a painting!
π: 0 β©: 0
DrOctoroc In reply to Darlaa [2009-05-14 13:46:46 +0000 UTC]
By the way, where have you been? Haven't seen your lovely face around these parts in awhile
π: 0 β©: 1
Darlaa In reply to DrOctoroc [2009-05-19 12:50:40 +0000 UTC]
I'm still here. i have moved to a bigger place. And all my beads is there! woho! I need something to bead again.. hmm
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to Darlaa [2009-05-19 14:15:40 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I just moved this past weekend and haven't gotten back into beading yet. SO much to do setting up the new place! My brother helped me move and after we finished bringing everything over he located all the boxes with beads in them and started making stuff, haha.
π: 0 β©: 1
Darlaa In reply to DrOctoroc [2009-05-20 09:17:33 +0000 UTC]
nice! gratz! i know its much to do when people are moving.. haha.
π: 0 β©: 0
aho-chan [2009-05-12 00:54:02 +0000 UTC]
If this isn't DD material, I don't know what is.
Great job on this! amazing!
π: 0 β©: 1
DrOctoroc In reply to aho-chan [2009-05-12 04:01:38 +0000 UTC]
Well, experience has taught me that reguardless of the actual piece being DD material, if it isn't a professional photograph of the piece, it wont get a DD...you can check my journal if you want that whole story, haha...about 3 entries ago, I belive.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>