HOME | DD

DT-Fox — Distinctive sizes

Published: 2010-02-12 05:58:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 798; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description A follow up to: [link]

And still, someone's either too big or too small. Though I think the BG messes that illusion up a little.
Related content
Comments: 16

MasterX-Con [2010-02-16 04:11:01 +0000 UTC]

epically cute you got a small thing going that soon to be a big one keep it up

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NS-Games [2010-02-12 06:22:43 +0000 UTC]

Kinda reminds me of the Mythbusters Intel commercial. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to NS-Games [2010-02-12 06:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Oh crap, you made me learn something... >:C But yup, it is the same concept. I like theirs better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NS-Games In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-12 06:33:26 +0000 UTC]

They're the Mythbuster! You always learn something watching them! However, something always ends up blowing up so it's much more interesting.

I keep laughing at the line "Even though he's tiny now, I'm still afraid of him." Adam always has the best one lined humor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to NS-Games [2010-02-12 06:43:22 +0000 UTC]

True. I need to check Discovery channel more often.

There was a British science show kinda like Mythbusters but it was more sciency. It used to be on G4, but I forgot the name of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NS-Games In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-12 06:50:18 +0000 UTC]

You mean that knock off "Brianiac: Science Abuse?" I never really took that show seriously to be honest. Not to say what they did wasn't legit, but some of it just seemed not well thought out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to NS-Games [2010-02-12 06:55:51 +0000 UTC]

I guess in comparison. They did get a good 3 or 4 seasons. But they did try to be more "entertaining" rather than naturally professional and just letting the entertainment flow through like Mythbusters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NS-Games In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-12 07:08:11 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. If there's one thing I notice on Mythbusters a lot it's that they are constantly letting the audience know how they're performing the test. They constantly tell the viewers not to email them, and that they've thought of solutions to possible variables the viewers may come up with. Not something I noticed too much on Brainiac.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Link2262 [2010-02-12 06:07:52 +0000 UTC]

Either way, it's cute. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to Link2262 [2010-02-12 06:09:09 +0000 UTC]

Lies and slander! Oh wait, I mean thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Link2262 In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-12 06:22:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atimist [2010-02-12 06:01:03 +0000 UTC]

Yeah with the BG there... I'm gonna have to say that... the gal in Blue, is a big one... and our doggie in purple is normal sized...

(sorry, their names slip my mind at the moment)

A nice pic. nonetheless... and sometimes its good to have a BG, so there IS less confusion...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to Atimist [2010-02-12 06:07:29 +0000 UTC]

At the same time, it COULD be a zoomed in view of the blue one and the purple one is still small. :b (I'm just trying to save face)

Oh, and their names are Omee and Aylia. I probably should start putting the names and the "(c)" in my descriptions again.

Thanks dude. I was more worried a white BG for this would seem like I was being a little lazy, though I don't think many people would've minded. : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atimist In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-12 06:20:50 +0000 UTC]

I guess you're right.... if there was only a tree or rock, or some other object that would give us more clues... GAAHhHH now I'm gonna loose sleep over it >_<

hahaha
Nice names I shall remember =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DT-Fox In reply to Atimist [2010-02-12 06:32:34 +0000 UTC]

But then that would be too easy. And you're gonna lose sleep over this? All according to plan. Wait, you stay up late, anyway. :b

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atimist In reply to DT-Fox [2010-02-13 15:27:59 +0000 UTC]

hahaha I know

👍: 0 ⏩: 0