HOME | DD

tsrubio92 In reply to ??? [2013-08-02 05:34:23 +0000 UTC]

Van Gogh realized no success during his time and had a wonderful talent that revolutionized the world of those who discovered his work post mortum. Success is a relative term and it was never stated that talent is necessary for success in our conversation. It merely distinguishes and makes more frequent and greater our successes. A man starting with 10 dollars (minimum talent) is capable of buying little (limited success). A man starting with a million dollars (copious amounts of talent) is capable of buying much (much success). If both men work as hard as one another they are then limited by the amount with which they start, however bother are necessary.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnaTattoo In reply to tsrubio92 [2013-08-02 07:42:16 +0000 UTC]

I see success as finally being recognized not by how much you make.
Then, I see what you call talent as hard work and intelligence.

Defenition of talent:
-Natural aptitude or skill.

I think art is like a other sense that you need to develop. Some already have it, some need a little help, some need to learn almost everything and some will never learn it. I just don't think that the only ones who will get success are the first ones (''some already have it'')

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mus0u In reply to ??? [2013-08-01 00:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnaTattoo In reply to mus0u [2013-08-01 01:57:46 +0000 UTC]

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0