HOME | DD

F16CrewChief — Caravelle

Published: 2011-05-07 14:32:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 803; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description This SE.210 Caravelle VI-R, c/n 86, N1001U belonged to Goodyear Aerospace and Litton Industies and was based at Goodyear MAP, AZ for many years.

This photo was taken on 16 February 1986.

As can be seen by the N-number, this was an old United Airlines aircraft back in the day...

This aircraft is now displayed at the Pima Air Museum in Tucson AZ.
Related content
Comments: 20

KyotoKid [2013-08-25 08:34:25 +0000 UTC]

...United used to fly these into my hometown for their service to New York. Only First Class service was offered, which was great when travelling on student or military standby and the next available flight with a seat was on one of these.

Back then, tickets were interchangeable between the different carriers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to KyotoKid [2013-09-01 22:56:27 +0000 UTC]

Did you ever see one still in service? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KyotoKid In reply to F16CrewChief [2013-09-03 07:20:54 +0000 UTC]

...United retired their Caravelles in 1970. 

Midwest Charter (which was acquired by Airborne Express in 1980) purchased 6 Caravelles from United and SAS (converted to cargo use) but those were soon replaced with DC-9 freighters.

There was one corporate Caravelle (N98KT - originally United N1017U) that was based in my old home town of Milwaukee WI and owned by Kearney & Trecker who purchased it in 1978.  That was the last Caravelle I ever saw in operation.  It was later flown to Van Nuys where it was placed in storage and eventually cut up in 2010.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to KyotoKid [2013-09-04 23:43:03 +0000 UTC]

Cool.  There is a Caravelle in use at Columbus OH MAP as a fire trainer. There us one at the major airport south of Cincinnati as well. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KyotoKid In reply to F16CrewChief [2013-09-07 09:58:36 +0000 UTC]

...such a sad fate for, in its time, such an advanced aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to KyotoKid [2013-09-08 22:01:05 +0000 UTC]

It was an elegant looking jet, but all of the early jet engines were gas (and oil) hogs!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ReneHenckens [2012-03-20 23:46:44 +0000 UTC]

Cool...That nose looks like is stood model for the 787

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

IanKeenan In reply to ReneHenckens [2012-03-21 06:16:09 +0000 UTC]

Based on the DH-106 Comet, the series I & III had the same forward fuselage as the Comet, including flight deck windows!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

F16CrewChief In reply to ReneHenckens [2012-03-20 23:51:09 +0000 UTC]

I would say that that nose predates the 787 by 60 years...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ReneHenckens In reply to F16CrewChief [2012-03-20 23:53:38 +0000 UTC]

I know...The nose of the 787 looks kinda like it. And it looks like Boeing has been looking for inspiration on this plane

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to ReneHenckens [2012-03-21 00:12:03 +0000 UTC]

Boeing has not had a good looking nose since the 757. The 767 and 777 are just plain ugly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ReneHenckens In reply to F16CrewChief [2012-03-21 00:17:36 +0000 UTC]

I think they look rather good. In any case, they're better than Airbusses.
And the 787 is -imo- a VERY handsome plane

but that's just me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to ReneHenckens [2012-03-21 22:52:03 +0000 UTC]

Rog! I am still partial to CV880's

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KyotoKid In reply to F16CrewChief [2013-09-09 21:04:42 +0000 UTC]

...used to see those a lot for Delta and TWA at ORD. I agree, another lovely "golden age" jetliner.

Northeast and Alaska were the only other US carriers to operate them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to KyotoKid [2013-09-09 22:59:15 +0000 UTC]

I believe TWA was a launch customer for the 880 along w/ Delta

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

putrick [2011-05-07 18:52:05 +0000 UTC]

Used by SwAF as SIGINT planes, my aunt did military service on such a plane and even if it is eons ago, she is born in 1950, she refuse to give details.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to putrick [2011-05-07 20:15:41 +0000 UTC]

Cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

focallength [2011-05-07 18:39:59 +0000 UTC]

Nice shot. What was interesting about the SE.210's was that they were essentially flying men's clubs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

F16CrewChief In reply to focallength [2011-05-07 20:18:32 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

focallength In reply to F16CrewChief [2011-05-07 21:51:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0