HOME | DD

Published: 2010-11-27 23:41:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 800; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 27
Redirect to original
Description
For ~keichoku by request [link]QF-100F 56-3974 #410 that made an emergency landing at Luke AFB after the canopy cracked during a functional check flight.
The acft took off from the Sperry facility at Goodyear MAP, AZ about 10 miles south for the FCF and declared an IFE when the transparacy failed and landed at Luke!
Related content
Comments: 20
keichoku [2010-11-28 21:53:57 +0000 UTC]
The orange paint denotes a drone, right?
Thanks for posting this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to keichoku [2010-11-28 21:55:44 +0000 UTC]
Yessir! This a QF-100F. The "Q" prefix means that it is capable of manned flight or remotely piloted flight for a drone mission.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keichoku In reply to F16CrewChief [2010-11-28 22:08:39 +0000 UTC]
Ah! Ergo the "RQ" of the recent Predator drones?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to keichoku [2010-11-28 22:18:46 +0000 UTC]
Yes, if we take a RQ-1A Predator, this MDS (Mission Design Series) designation of US acft and Missiles is called out in DoD 4120.15-L
This regulations defines that the prefix "R" is a "Modified Mission" designator denoting Reconaissance. The "Q" denotes the "Mission" as an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The number after the "-" is the "Design" so a Predator is the first UAV in this numbering sequence. The A is the first model in the "series".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keichoku In reply to F16CrewChief [2010-11-28 23:27:41 +0000 UTC]
I see! Thanks. I gathered as much, but never had it explained in this kind of detail before. I appreciate it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to keichoku [2010-11-28 23:39:17 +0000 UTC]
The Army used this type of designation system before WWII. The Navy's was very confusing and had the manufacturer play a large part in the designation so that an F4F-1 was the fistiteration of the fourth fighter design from Grumman. The F4U-5 was the fifth variation of the fourth fighter design from Vought.
Defense Secretary McNamara put an end to the Navy designation system in 1962 when there was a great congressional debate about the merits of the new Navy F4H-1 interceptor over the new USAF F-110A all weather fighter. In fact they were the exact same aircraft... The Phantom II
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
keichoku In reply to F16CrewChief [2010-11-29 03:07:44 +0000 UTC]
Oh! I was wondering why the Navy designations abruptly shift in the early 60s! You've answered one of my oldest aircraft-related questions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to keichoku [2010-11-29 11:03:42 +0000 UTC]
That was the reason! All caused by the Phantom!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
F16CrewChief In reply to Enterprise206 [2010-11-28 14:12:23 +0000 UTC]
I do not understand what you are asking, sorry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Enterprise206 In reply to F16CrewChief [2010-11-28 18:27:33 +0000 UTC]
i meant whats going to happen to this plane now?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to Enterprise206 [2010-11-28 18:58:25 +0000 UTC]
It was destroyed as an aerial target.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to Enterprise206 [2010-11-29 00:51:15 +0000 UTC]
I do not have a date of the shoot down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
plumpener [2010-11-28 04:10:17 +0000 UTC]
What the heck is that comb looking thing fastened vertically to the nose needle blocking the intake?!
Nice pic by the way, I love the Super Saber, and I am really looking forward to photoing it for the first time at Castle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to plumpener [2010-11-28 14:03:38 +0000 UTC]
That is the pitot tube that bends vertically for stowage. The tube is very long and easily damaged when it is in the flight position. The tube has a protective cover installed on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F16CrewChief In reply to plumpener [2010-11-28 17:05:10 +0000 UTC]
[link] is a pic of a Terre Haute Indiana ANG jet w/ the tube in flight position. It is long!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
plumpener In reply to F16CrewChief [2010-11-28 17:11:25 +0000 UTC]
You aint kiddin! I like the Green camo on it too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1