HOME | DD
Published: 2014-03-17 02:39:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 4022; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description
Title says it.Lawful Good: Claire "Lightning" Farron: Final Fantasy XIII
Neutral Good: Solid Snake: Metal Gear Solid
Chaotic Good: Garrus: Mass Effect
Lawful Neutral: Altair Ibn-La'Ahad: Assassin's Creed
True Neutral: Ada Wong: Resident Evil
Chaotic Neutral: Garrett: Thief
Lawful Evil:Β Raphael: Soul Calibur
Neutral Evil: Agent 47: Hitman
Chaotic Evil: Dark Link: Legend of Zelda
This won't be my last.
I own none of this. Just the chart.
Related content
Comments: 22
ScrewBattle [2022-03-02 12:43:01 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Gravatona [2016-08-05 21:50:16 +0000 UTC]
Interesting.
Though I don't think Lightning is lawful good. The game starts with her fighting against the government (breaking the law) to save her sister. (SPOILERS) And ends up (in 1 and 3) fighting the largest authority figures.Β
I'd say she's a neutral good, but perhaps even a chaotic good, since she's generally willing to risk everything to do what she think's is right. Β
π: 0 β©: 2
ScrewBattle In reply to Gravatona [2022-03-02 12:45:13 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
ScrewBattle In reply to Gravatona [2022-03-02 12:44:28 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
OneWingedHeron53 [2015-05-26 22:04:22 +0000 UTC]
I always thought Raphael would be Neutral Evil. He does all his deeds only to make Amy happy. But hey, it's just my opinion. I'll respect yours.
π: 0 β©: 1
fantasylover100 In reply to OneWingedHeron53 [2015-05-26 22:17:07 +0000 UTC]
Good point
π: 0 β©: 0
Katanatata [2014-07-22 00:02:02 +0000 UTC]
47 is not evil. He is the true neutral. He only does his job, kills his target, gets paid. He is only doing his job by fulfilling contracts. It is nothing personal unless it gets personal.
π: 0 β©: 1
fantasylover100 In reply to Katanatata [2014-07-22 00:12:12 +0000 UTC]
In the first game maybe. The last two he doesn't seem to be in the true neutral area anymore.
π: 0 β©: 1
Katanatata In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-07-22 00:15:11 +0000 UTC]
I suppose, but like I said, they made it personal. He still acts within his code. Canonically, he does things efficiently and only seeks to eliminate his target. Still not evil. Still more of a true neutral or even lawful (in the aspect that he sticks to his code of conduct).
π: 0 β©: 0
fantasylover100 In reply to Shiranui425 [2014-03-17 17:55:56 +0000 UTC]
"Snake what's wrong? Snake?! SNAAAAAAKE!!"
π: 0 β©: 1
Shiranui425 In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-03-17 20:09:41 +0000 UTC]
Snake: "SHUT UP, I'M RIGHT HERE!"XD
π: 0 β©: 0
fantasylover100 In reply to Its-A-Beautiful-Day [2014-03-17 02:55:14 +0000 UTC]
They all rock
π: 0 β©: 1
Its-A-Beautiful-Day In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-03-17 02:59:22 +0000 UTC]
Careful of sopa 2014
π: 0 β©: 1
fantasylover100 In reply to Its-A-Beautiful-Day [2014-03-17 03:22:25 +0000 UTC]
It won't last. It's already over 70,000 votes to stop it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Its-A-Beautiful-Day In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-03-17 03:34:49 +0000 UTC]
Last year they banned over 100+ deviants for no Β reason.Β
I guess your right but they might strike like last time Β
π: 0 β©: 1
fantasylover100 In reply to Its-A-Beautiful-Day [2014-03-17 03:45:02 +0000 UTC]
Over 100?! WTFFF?!
π: 0 β©: 1
Its-A-Beautiful-Day In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-03-17 04:05:52 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
fantasylover100 In reply to Its-A-Beautiful-Day [2014-03-17 04:11:18 +0000 UTC]
For absolutely no reason at all? I don't buy it
π: 0 β©: 1
Its-A-Beautiful-Day In reply to fantasylover100 [2014-03-17 04:14:17 +0000 UTC]




















