HOME | DD

fb101A dialogue

Published: 2005-02-22 07:05:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 14956; Favourites: 180; Downloads: 3771
Redirect to original
Description Model : Maria V.
Related content
Comments: 183

sergiofx [2005-02-22 11:08:56 +0000 UTC]

oh for...

it's a freakin topless girl with her hands on top of her chest...

anyone seen that before? :mad:

wtf is so DD about this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

dakth In reply to sergiofx [2005-02-23 07:31:11 +0000 UTC]

How is it not deserving of a DD?

A DD is an admin feature with no, I repeat NO set criteria. It's not an award, nor is it for popularity. The admin chooses it because s/he likes it.

Why did I choose it? Because I like it.

Don't attack the artist, send me a note with your complaints. It's not the artist's fault that I chose it for DD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sergiofx In reply to dakth [2005-02-23 17:20:12 +0000 UTC]

I dont think i attacked the artist, please, read my post...

I said the picture is not that great, its not original at all and I dont like it...


I didnt say that admins have critieria, someone else did, IF you read the posts...


I simply implied that the picture is not that good, and that i disagree with the admin, whoever he/she is that it should be a feature... I have seen lots and lots of pictures that are better than this...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KagomeResurrected In reply to sergiofx [2005-02-23 06:14:55 +0000 UTC]

i SO agree -_-;;
this DD has irritated me greatly...
women - clothes does not ALWAYS equal art....
*grumbles and rants uselessly*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shortidiva19 In reply to sergiofx [2005-02-22 13:43:55 +0000 UTC]

I hate to say it...but I actually agree...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

b-mac In reply to shortidiva19 [2005-02-22 17:40:26 +0000 UTC]

if it were 3d rendered then fair enough, but it isn't so whats the point?
Maybe this means that normal devs (as in those without supernatural artistic powers) actually have a chance at a DD.

Not that I don't dig the lighting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

BtRBVer2 In reply to b-mac [2005-02-23 03:35:25 +0000 UTC]

agreed, and on top of that, why is it so small? did the focus come out crappy, or was it blurred and to compensate it was shrunk down?

i like my dev's big so i can gobble up or thumb my nose at the detail that was captured.

i mean, it's not a BAD picture, it's pretty good in fact, but DD? sorry, not quite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

b-mac In reply to BtRBVer2 [2005-02-24 19:48:14 +0000 UTC]

yeah, I don't mean to be harsh to the artist, I just don't feel that it deserves DD status, which is unfair on them because they've clearly put the effort in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

truemarmalade In reply to b-mac [2005-02-22 18:09:58 +0000 UTC]

I agree with yous, there's nothing too incredible about this picture. The lighting is soso, her hair is terrible (she could have at least combed it or something).
I thought DD's were for rare pieces of art that show extensive talent. I think there shouldn't be so many each day, reserve it for those that are truely worthy of it.

[sorry if any of that sounds terribly mean, but it's just what I think]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

b-mac In reply to truemarmalade [2005-02-24 19:43:18 +0000 UTC]

hey, not every comment can on dA can be positive and show adoration to the deviant. I take far more interest in my comments that actually say what they don't like about something, although it is nice to be told that some of my work is "cool" because at least then they're giving you recognition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phi-AU In reply to sergiofx [2005-02-22 11:52:56 +0000 UTC]

I agree 100%... DD is getting questionable lately

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jimmjrg [2005-02-22 11:04:08 +0000 UTC]

I love her eyes, the way the bluw stands out, it draws you into them. Great lighting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Little-Shepherd In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 10:53:53 +0000 UTC]

indeed a very beautiful picture.. though subject based.... not such composition based...
crisp, clean and in focus not much more to ask for. except artistic direction..?
hmmm no it is indeed great.. i mean hey i clicked on it didn't i...

photoshop rendering on the eyes?... this i am unsure...

alas..

well done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlueAeroplane [2005-02-22 10:45:15 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, but this reminds me of one of those really bad afternoon soap opera shows.
Anyway, congratulations for the DD all the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chomba [2005-02-22 09:54:50 +0000 UTC]

I like how the color of her eyes resalt (¿?) look whit the inlightment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spekta- In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:51:13 +0000 UTC]

Congrats on DD, very nice photo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jerishoots In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:48:10 +0000 UTC]

i like the spot light effect on the face. cheers man.

jer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StylusRose [2005-02-22 09:35:21 +0000 UTC]

The lighting out's to much focus on the facem and takes away from the body, the body and hair looks very very dull. Or maybe you meant to put all the focus on her face.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fb101 In reply to StylusRose [2005-02-22 18:04:36 +0000 UTC]

You guessed right

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FinchyGurl99 In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:25:26 +0000 UTC]

WOW, the lighting! She almost doesn't look real!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ellusive In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:19:18 +0000 UTC]

very very very nice. I really like this picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elly-mae In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:16:51 +0000 UTC]

very pretty picture! is that dirt or sand on her?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fb101 In reply to elly-mae [2005-02-22 18:06:25 +0000 UTC]

None, why ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

elly-mae In reply to fb101 [2005-02-23 10:07:39 +0000 UTC]

no - it just sorta looks like it..but this is an amazing image!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cholo0428 In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:15:34 +0000 UTC]

innocent face, deep eyes... love the lighting... and the focus on her eyes... she looks natural but somewhat artificial... (difficult to explain)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ParasiteGod In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 09:14:02 +0000 UTC]

hummm.. DD, but honestly i dont like the light in her face and the colors seem dull. just my honest opinion

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fb101 In reply to ParasiteGod [2005-02-22 18:07:30 +0000 UTC]

And I thank you for it....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DeadWeight69 [2005-02-22 09:07:52 +0000 UTC]

Woh. Those r some eyes u could drown in...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FreddyC [2005-02-22 08:18:43 +0000 UTC]

nice lighting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tekhiun In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 07:07:30 +0000 UTC]

I think it was the light , but she looks like a 3d-rendered model on this picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

i-am-at0m In reply to tekhiun [2005-02-23 02:29:45 +0000 UTC]

I thought the same thing at first

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Joshua-D-Sarver In reply to ??? [2005-02-22 07:07:24 +0000 UTC]

nice lighting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |