HOME | DD

Fiery-Fire In reply to YIYI9556 [2009-12-20 02:10:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you I liked this one as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fiery-Fire In reply to Yenkoff [2009-01-17 10:52:26 +0000 UTC]

More mediative piece
Glad you enjoy it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fiery-Fire In reply to sabertooth-sheep [2009-01-16 00:04:55 +0000 UTC]

YES !!! well Uf is very different then apo - renders faster
plus Im into exploring the formulas lately soo I have many versions
from one set of params -and none of them look the same

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sabertooth-sheep In reply to Fiery-Fire [2009-01-16 00:14:38 +0000 UTC]

maybe if i get tired of apo id try Uf, but i think i had better get used to apo before i can say im tired of it lol. very good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiery-Fire In reply to sabertooth-sheep [2009-01-16 00:30:26 +0000 UTC]

hehee good point -hey you can learn both, Im still learning apo
I picked up UF faster then apo - the software interface is build
in similar way to photoshop, which I use on regular bases made way
easier to 'move' around the program (no triangles..hahaha)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sabertooth-sheep In reply to Fiery-Fire [2009-01-18 08:58:52 +0000 UTC]

wow. i might have to check that out. i love photoshop. all the images in my gallery were made on photoshop except for like the last 3 i did

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiery-Fire In reply to sabertooth-sheep [2009-01-18 09:27:08 +0000 UTC]

You should if you like ps - Uf is awesome ...i mean picture
creating pieces of a puzzle and every single one is independent
you can tweak the color, shape and scale ....heaven

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sabertooth-sheep In reply to Fiery-Fire [2009-01-19 05:00:25 +0000 UTC]

i may have to look into this lol. apo vs. "heaven"... hmmm tough call

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fiery-Fire In reply to sabertooth-sheep [2009-01-19 05:43:28 +0000 UTC]

well your pick ..apo can wait as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 0