HOME | DD

FractalMonster — Inside Out by-nc-sa

Published: 2007-05-27 13:43:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 1601; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 16
Redirect to original
Description Turning the Mandelbrot set inside out

or

When zero and infinity alter their places

Full view please for the illustration


The upper half of the illustration is generated by the dynamical process z -> z^2 + c when the variable “z” is initiated to zero and “c” varies with the pixels (c = # pixels). The black part is the Mandelbrot set and is constituted of those “c” for which “z” under iteration stays forever within a radius of 2 from the center of the dynamical (z-) plane. The surrounding colors are settled according to how many iterations (how many times the variable “z” has to pass the loop) for the corresponding “c” before “z” passes a radius of at least two, in this image 10, and thus escapes to infinity. But all of this is much more clearly described in articles 1 – 9 in my Chaotic series of fractal articles.

Now we shall perform a little joke. We let the infinity and zero on the parameter plane (the c-plane) alter their places. That means we turn the parameter plane (containing the M set and the surrounding level sets) inside out by instead iterating z -> z^2 + 1/c. The result is shown in the lower part of the illustration, the black set is the Inverse Mandelbrot set. that now surrounds the level sets in the central part of the image. Note that there are one-to-one correspondences between every point in the upper and lower planes if they are extended to include the infinity. In fact the border of the sets are exactly similar, the branches of the Inverse M set containing copies of ordinary M set in exactly the same way the ordinary M set does. The double arrowhead lines show this.

This “inside-out-process” throw away the “zero” in the upper motive to infinity’s infinity in any direction in the lower image and, at the same time, catches the infinity’s infinity in any direction in the upper image and places it on the well defined spot “at infinity” in the lower image. But all this has partly to do with the mysteries of zero divides, see my preceding journal The mysteries of zero divides

And when the space is turned inside out, the whole universe will be situated inside you
Related content
Comments: 121

LillieaArt In reply to ??? [2010-04-06 12:49:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I'll have a go

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to LillieaArt [2010-04-06 13:04:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WizenedCloud In reply to ??? [2010-03-12 08:24:06 +0000 UTC]

"And when the space is turned inside out, the whole universe will be situated inside you"

Aaaah! Light begins to dawn now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to WizenedCloud [2010-03-12 15:04:50 +0000 UTC]



This is somewhat related to [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bermarte In reply to ??? [2009-10-08 10:23:38 +0000 UTC]

YES!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to bermarte [2009-10-08 10:38:16 +0000 UTC]

This is related to the mysteries of zero divides

BTW, also check out [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bermarte In reply to FractalMonster [2009-10-08 16:12:39 +0000 UTC]

Thinking about them as objects or sets it is interesting.
I am not sure if they are infinite; maybe not?
Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to bermarte [2009-10-08 19:35:52 +0000 UTC]

That's the approach I always have. At least the borders have infinite length (as the borders are fractals) And yeah, The Mandelbrot set have an infinite area if it's turned inside out (not otherwise)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bermarte In reply to FractalMonster [2009-10-08 22:51:41 +0000 UTC]

OMG!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to bermarte [2009-10-08 23:32:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeah

..and when we turn the M set inside out, we catch the infinity and place it in the well defined point "at infinity" in the center of the coordinate system, the spot where the zero was before the "inside-out" operation

A big mystery: From which direction did we catch the infinity, and in which direction did we throw away the zero when we throw it to infinity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bermarte In reply to FractalMonster [2009-10-17 00:36:04 +0000 UTC]

I have the book of Mandelbrot next to me.
It says 'gli oggetti frattali', forma,caso e dimensione.
Here is talking about a certain Koch..page 30..
You make the thing more interesting!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to bermarte [2009-10-17 00:40:28 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like "The Fractal Geometry of Nature" which I got for some years ago

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x-Emz-Heart-x In reply to ??? [2009-01-25 08:11:59 +0000 UTC]

Hey, that does make sense if you put it into perspective hmmm.. Me like
Em xx ♥

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to x-Emz-Heart-x [2009-01-25 15:40:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Thinks one get a very intuitive feeling of this illustration

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-Emz-Heart-x In reply to FractalMonster [2009-01-25 23:12:49 +0000 UTC]

Ahh okk. Cool.
Em xx ♥

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to x-Emz-Heart-x [2009-01-26 00:01:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, isn't I think you got that feeling

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

x-Emz-Heart-x In reply to FractalMonster [2009-01-26 10:08:19 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.
Em xx ♥

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spamkiller In reply to ??? [2008-10-22 10:42:11 +0000 UTC]

Wow, I could stare at it for hours! @_@

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Spamkiller [2008-10-22 10:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Then you'll be transcended into infinity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spamkiller In reply to FractalMonster [2008-10-22 11:05:10 +0000 UTC]

I could finally read all the books I want to read and design all the fractals I want to make!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Spamkiller [2008-10-22 11:15:27 +0000 UTC]

Well, then you must be a "time millionaire" Really glad if I've inspired you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spamkiller In reply to FractalMonster [2008-10-22 11:19:25 +0000 UTC]

It's nice to be a millionaire of some kind!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Spamkiller [2008-10-22 11:46:40 +0000 UTC]

Yeah Not only with respect to money

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spamkiller In reply to FractalMonster [2008-10-25 23:55:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

im1happy In reply to ??? [2007-08-26 21:36:20 +0000 UTC]

Oh wow I like the way u presented this Nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to im1happy [2007-08-26 21:48:07 +0000 UTC]

Really glad you appreciate it And meditation upon the illustration will give a good intuitive understanding

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

im1happy In reply to FractalMonster [2007-08-26 22:15:55 +0000 UTC]

10-4 heheee yes it does nice to see this from this perspective

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to im1happy [2007-08-26 22:25:45 +0000 UTC]

(But I dunno what you mean with 10-4)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

im1happy In reply to FractalMonster [2007-08-26 22:28:41 +0000 UTC]

LOL 10-4 means yes sir!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to im1happy [2007-08-26 22:39:57 +0000 UTC]

Learned more American English tonight

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

im1happy In reply to FractalMonster [2007-08-27 00:37:53 +0000 UTC]

LOL Alright

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nidhi-rathish In reply to ??? [2007-06-30 21:50:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow thats really awesome! I wish I could do that - Turn inside out ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to nidhi-rathish [2007-07-03 14:25:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, when zero plays with infinity everything could happen

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nidhi-rathish In reply to FractalMonster [2007-07-03 20:12:50 +0000 UTC]

cool! I don't like barriers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to nidhi-rathish [2007-07-04 20:31:51 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, the zero an the infinity are perhaps the only entities the neglegt any barriers

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nidhi-rathish In reply to FractalMonster [2007-07-05 18:35:52 +0000 UTC]

I like zero ^^ we introduced it to the world after all *is very proud* lol :wink: I'm trying to be all pompous hehe!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to nidhi-rathish [2007-07-06 08:21:03 +0000 UTC]

You are aloowed to be The idea of the mighty nothingless is very fascinating and great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mkdieb In reply to ??? [2007-05-29 05:57:12 +0000 UTC]

woooo hooo! you amaze me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to mkdieb [2007-05-29 12:17:53 +0000 UTC]

...and you are not afraid being turned inside out
Thank you Kathi

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mkdieb In reply to FractalMonster [2007-05-29 12:43:01 +0000 UTC]

its never bothered me before (grin)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Droid24747 [2007-05-28 00:50:59 +0000 UTC]

I love inversing fractal shapes!^^ Cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Droid24747 [2007-05-28 09:37:47 +0000 UTC]

I also Thank you Chris

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FractalEuphoria [2007-05-27 23:43:38 +0000 UTC]

that is so cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to FractalEuphoria [2007-05-27 23:55:08 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, isn't it Glad to see the great Apo-master (från andra sidan kölen) appreciate my raw basic escape fractals

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalEuphoria In reply to FractalMonster [2007-05-28 11:33:16 +0000 UTC]

great apo-master?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to FractalEuphoria [2007-05-28 12:11:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I think you to be so I myself am a complete idiot regarding these kind of sometimes very beautiful fractals (IFS, Flame). In fact the subject of fractal images has a very wide range

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalEuphoria In reply to FractalMonster [2007-05-28 13:00:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to FractalEuphoria [2007-05-29 12:25:47 +0000 UTC]


👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pugluvr In reply to ??? [2007-05-27 21:47:34 +0000 UTC]

Fascinating

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to pugluvr [2007-05-27 22:02:34 +0000 UTC]

..and you haven't been thrown to infinity yet

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>