HOME | DD

Published: 2012-11-20 10:14:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 2593; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 55
Redirect to original
Description
doneRelated content
Comments: 21
wingsofwrath [2012-11-25 12:53:32 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!
There's something endearing about this beast even though I doubt it would have proven very good on an actual battlefield considering it's bulk, lack of mobility and the uselessness of the twin turret design, especially since there is no actual reason for the 20mm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giganaut In reply to wingsofwrath [2012-11-25 22:51:58 +0000 UTC]
this monster was originally aimed for both infantry and anti tank support
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2012-11-22 07:45:03 +0000 UTC]
17pdr and a 20mm hun assisted with co axial mguns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2012-11-22 07:51:46 +0000 UTC]
what is its armor thickness
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2012-11-22 15:13:23 +0000 UTC]
230mm, 152mm and 100mm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2012-11-26 03:02:45 +0000 UTC]
whats it engine and horse power and was this a real tank?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2012-11-26 03:31:00 +0000 UTC]
possible slightly lower than the A39 tortoise or the same and no it was only a paper project only to develop the A39's form and shape that we see today
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2012-11-26 03:50:12 +0000 UTC]
oh cool so its less than 800hp that slow as hell man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2012-11-26 06:28:19 +0000 UTC]
well thats sometimes an issue
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2012-11-26 06:42:18 +0000 UTC]
yup. since at that time they chose more protection than mobility due to the cruiser tanks's performance in the battlefield was abit, grim
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Giganaut In reply to JazzLizard [2012-11-22 00:09:37 +0000 UTC]
lol that the british for you XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0