HOME | DD

Published: 2013-06-17 06:46:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 4430; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 30
Redirect to original
Description
yuo the first of the AT series from NuffieldRelated content
Comments: 23
Giganaut In reply to ConnorSwift [2013-09-24 14:11:59 +0000 UTC]
google sketchup 8 pro with V-ray
š: 0 ā©: 0
Giganaut In reply to Hunter12396 [2013-07-30 15:28:31 +0000 UTC]
forum.worldoftanks.com/index.pā¦
š: 0 ā©: 0
stokeman [2013-06-20 11:42:47 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, that howitzer ought to prove itself usable against armour with HEAT shells.
It would have made an interesting assault gun had it been introduced in the war at any rate.
š: 0 ā©: 0
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-17 11:40:09 +0000 UTC]
i prefer this to the AT-2 tho
š: 0 ā©: 2
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 18:31:37 +0000 UTC]
Really do you know how thick the armour is?
š: 0 ā©: 1
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-18 03:09:14 +0000 UTC]
8 inch front, 4 inch rear and sides
š: 0 ā©: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-18 08:05:52 +0000 UTC]
Well that's really thick
š: 0 ā©: 1
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-18 15:30:58 +0000 UTC]
When was this developed WW1?
š: 0 ā©: 1
Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-19 00:04:54 +0000 UTC]
WW2. but the A39 tortoise(AT-16) was built after the war
š: 0 ā©: 2
Mizukiskouhai In reply to Giganaut [2016-12-09 01:02:55 +0000 UTC]
Wasn't. The Tortoise was drawn up yes. But never entered production
š: 0 ā©: 1
Giganaut In reply to Mizukiskouhai [2016-12-09 22:38:32 +0000 UTC]
all other AT series from Nuffield are drawn up yes, but the AT-16, which later became the A39 tortoise was built but not for mass production. its in bovington tank museum and in running condition.
siberia-miniatures.ru/siberia-ā¦
š: 0 ā©: 1
Mizukiskouhai In reply to Giganaut [2016-12-10 02:05:42 +0000 UTC]
Most interesting. I should go see it sometime
š: 0 ā©: 0
Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-19 09:58:52 +0000 UTC]
AH understandable
š: 0 ā©: 0
Krag7 In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 12:44:36 +0000 UTC]
yeah, the biggest gun the AT-2 had was a three inch howitzer, with a huge berth between that and the next biggest, which was a 2 or 3 pounder(?)
š: 0 ā©: 1
Giganaut In reply to Krag7 [2013-06-17 13:04:54 +0000 UTC]
the AT-1 i measured used the 3.7 inch howitzer (94mm)
š: 0 ā©: 1
Krag7 In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 13:06:01 +0000 UTC]
yeah, 3.7, i was just saying in generality XD
š: 0 ā©: 1
Giganaut In reply to Krag7 [2013-06-17 15:53:09 +0000 UTC]
well the british had 3.7 and 3 inch howitzers lol there is a difference XD
š: 0 ā©: 1