HOME | DD

Giganaut — AT-1

Published: 2013-06-17 06:46:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 4430; Favourites: 33; Downloads: 30
Redirect to original
Description yuo the first of the AT series from Nuffield
Related content
Comments: 23

ConnorSwift [2013-09-24 00:00:21 +0000 UTC]

What program do you use to make these?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to ConnorSwift [2013-09-24 14:11:59 +0000 UTC]

google sketchup 8 pro with V-ray

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Hunter12396 [2013-07-30 15:14:23 +0000 UTC]

where do you find the bluprints?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Hunter12396 [2013-07-30 15:28:31 +0000 UTC]

forum.worldoftanks.com/index.p…

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

stokeman [2013-06-20 11:42:47 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, that howitzer ought to prove itself usable against armour with HEAT shells.

It would have made an interesting assault gun had it been introduced in the war at any rate.

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-17 06:58:55 +0000 UTC]

Ha that's a funny looking Tank

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-17 11:40:09 +0000 UTC]

i prefer this to the AT-2 tho

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 2

Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 18:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Really do you know how thick the armour is?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-18 03:09:14 +0000 UTC]

8 inch front, 4 inch rear and sides

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-18 08:05:52 +0000 UTC]

Well that's really thick

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-18 09:07:16 +0000 UTC]

very

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-18 15:30:58 +0000 UTC]

When was this developed WW1?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Commander-Fillmore [2013-06-19 00:04:54 +0000 UTC]

WW2. but the A39 tortoise(AT-16) was built after the war

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 2

Mizukiskouhai In reply to Giganaut [2016-12-09 01:02:55 +0000 UTC]

Wasn't. The Tortoise was drawn up yes. But never entered production

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Mizukiskouhai [2016-12-09 22:38:32 +0000 UTC]

all other AT series from Nuffield are drawn up yes, but the AT-16, which later became the A39 tortoise was built but not for mass production. its in bovington tank museum and in running condition.

siberia-miniatures.ru/siberia-…

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Mizukiskouhai In reply to Giganaut [2016-12-10 02:05:42 +0000 UTC]

Most interesting. I should go see it sometime

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Commander-Fillmore In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-19 09:58:52 +0000 UTC]

AH understandable

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0

Krag7 In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 12:44:36 +0000 UTC]

yeah, the biggest gun the AT-2 had was a three inch howitzer, with a huge berth between that and the next biggest, which was a 2 or 3 pounder(?)

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Krag7 [2013-06-17 13:04:54 +0000 UTC]

the AT-1 i measured used the 3.7 inch howitzer (94mm)

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Krag7 In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 13:06:01 +0000 UTC]

yeah, 3.7, i was just saying in generality XD

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Krag7 [2013-06-17 15:53:09 +0000 UTC]

well the british had 3.7 and 3 inch howitzers lol there is a difference XD

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Krag7 In reply to Giganaut [2013-06-17 16:42:08 +0000 UTC]

oh, they did?

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 1

Giganaut In reply to Krag7 [2013-06-18 03:09:23 +0000 UTC]

yup

šŸ‘: 0 ā©: 0