HOME | DD

gnaime — If Then

Published: 2007-09-09 05:53:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 1224; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 25
Redirect to original
Description One conclusion to be drawn is that, IF a computer can effectively calculate an algorithm THEN so can an equivalent Turing Machine. But the converse is not true: It is NOT true that IF a Turing machine can calculate an algorithm THEN so can a computer; no computer is as computationally powerful as a Turing Machine since a computer does not have the required infinite memory nor infinitely-sized variables.

Thus it is not possible to build a calculation device that is as powerful as the simplest theoretical computing mechanism (a Turing machine). Note that this formulation of power disregards practical factors such as speed or memory capacity; it considers all that is theoretically possible, given unlimited time and memory.


----

stock:


original size:
20x35 inches
Related content
Comments: 18

seanfus [2007-10-02 19:57:15 +0000 UTC]

Woo, man, this is awesome. I haven't been on DA in a long time, I needed this. Makes me want to make things again, thanks man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to seanfus [2007-10-02 20:04:50 +0000 UTC]

coming from you? That's fucking awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ajd [2007-09-15 17:42:30 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE the red section with the white lines scoring down.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to ajd [2007-09-15 19:08:35 +0000 UTC]

ah yes! That's one of those "bah let's fuckin try this" type of things. I'm glad it came out like it did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bnspyrd [2007-09-15 03:37:58 +0000 UTC]

Wicked design work! So detailed, thanks for using my male vintage stock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to Bnspyrd [2007-09-15 19:06:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for commenting/faving and of course the stock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bnspyrd In reply to gnaime [2007-09-16 01:48:36 +0000 UTC]

You're indeed very welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hcirtep [2007-09-15 01:41:47 +0000 UTC]

Awesome job once again but I dare you to break away from your style. I put up a new work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to hcirtep [2007-09-15 19:06:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

McClelland [2007-09-13 00:17:30 +0000 UTC]

i dig the hypothesis.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to McClelland [2007-09-13 01:18:53 +0000 UTC]

It's well known I've heard. But Turing Machines are definitely, at the very least, interesting -- if not inspiring.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thedarkroom [2007-09-10 12:50:51 +0000 UTC]

Haven't seen anything from you in a while.....looking good

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to thedarkroom [2007-09-10 13:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Yeah been busy with work, man. On top of that is freelance design/web work. Which leaves only small amounts of time for myself which I don't usually spend in Photoshop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thedarkroom In reply to gnaime [2007-09-11 16:08:30 +0000 UTC]

Hope everything is going good are you in DC now? How is life a treatin ya?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to thedarkroom [2007-09-11 18:43:21 +0000 UTC]

I'm in Boston now, man. Life is treatin' me alright I guess. Winter is coming up though...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thedarkroom In reply to gnaime [2007-09-13 11:22:09 +0000 UTC]

yep it's almost here but the approach is welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

slvrmntzn [2007-09-09 07:51:36 +0000 UTC]

It's wicked. I get a Vegas feelin' looking at it, which I know was not the intention, and that tickles me somewhat. The girl is surreal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gnaime In reply to slvrmntzn [2007-09-09 16:16:01 +0000 UTC]

Wicked Vegas tickles me surreal. That could be the new title

Thanks and nice signature. "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0