HOME | DD

Published: 2005-01-21 08:29:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 15680; Favourites: 506; Downloads: 1277
Redirect to original
Description
*Note: Not Vector Art. See media description*The latest Retro Girl
This is another piece I did the sketch for months ago, but with finishing the calendar, it got put on hold.
Medium: Original sketch drawn over in Photoshop with the pen tool, not vectors since the lines and shapes rasterize. It is similar process, but by devart definitions, anything that rasterizes is not vector art. Details added with brush tool.
*Edit* Added some bubbles for balance, thanks for the suggestion, ~ExiledSnake
Related content
Comments: 122
Mandymtt [2005-01-21 12:15:09 +0000 UTC]
i love the different shades of blue in her hair!!! She looks like a traditional mermaid! ^____^ Awsome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MommySpike [2005-01-21 12:13:00 +0000 UTC]
I saw the coolest mermaid movie yesterday, "She Creature" (2001), so I've had mermaids on the brain. I'm grateful that this little cutie is nothing like the ones on the movie!
Well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoblinQueeen In reply to MommySpike [2005-01-21 12:14:49 +0000 UTC]
I've heard about that from a few people now. I think I really need to see it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
katie8787 [2005-01-21 11:54:45 +0000 UTC]
The blues, greens, and oranges you chose all compliment each other extremely well in this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoblinQueeen In reply to katie8787 [2005-01-21 12:16:49 +0000 UTC]
Thank you The hair I knew I wanted blue as soon as I had drawn it, but the orange I didn't decide on until I started working on it tonight. Glad I'm not the only one that sees the combination working
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zephyree [2005-01-21 09:17:00 +0000 UTC]
i lover her pose and her sexy look! a really nice pic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tumbleweedink [2005-01-21 09:04:47 +0000 UTC]
I love it when you invert something into retro-girl style.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cippow25 [2005-01-21 09:00:41 +0000 UTC]
Yey! Me like this!
I love it when you draw mythical creatures!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
studioboo In reply to ??? [2005-01-21 08:57:50 +0000 UTC]
i'm *really* enjoying the variety you're going for with your retrogirls lately. it's so much fun!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tenshiryuu In reply to ??? [2005-01-21 08:39:20 +0000 UTC]
Like the way you did her hair. Very cute. Ah, I must recommend a book to you since I am currently on a rant about it. It's called the Katurran Odessey by Terry Whitlatch. It has the most amazing animal drawings I've seen, and there's even a picture with a gerenuk! And lemurs. You must see it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoblinQueeen In reply to Tenshiryuu [2005-01-21 08:52:07 +0000 UTC]
ooooh, yes I must! Must see the rest of Saiyuki, too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stacey73 [2005-01-21 08:38:25 +0000 UTC]
"anything that rasterizes is not vector art" sucking as badly as I do at creating art in photoshop it's not a wonder that that particular statement confuses me. Nevertheless, Could you expound on that a bit for me so I can better understand the differences? Im not terribly familiar with the process of vectoring... I thought 'rasterizing' enabled the shape to be re-sized without loss of detail... doesnt a vector possess that same quality? *is curious*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoblinQueeen In reply to Stacey73 [2005-01-21 08:51:36 +0000 UTC]
No, in terms of vectors, rasterizing means that it can no longer be resized without loss of quality. What photoshop uses is not even a vector to begin with though. It is a path. You construct it the same way you would a vector, but a vector is a mathmatical reference point so to speak so that you could do something at 50x50 pixels persay, then enlarge it to 2000x2000 pixels and the mathmatical relations stay the same, so the quality is just as crisp. In Photoshop, what the path does is create a selection area you can then fill with a color, but it is like any other shape in Photoshop, if you try to enlarge it to much, it will get pixelated and blurry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stacey73 In reply to GoblinQueeen [2005-01-21 10:31:59 +0000 UTC]
Ahhhh I think I understand. thank you so much. That had been something I had wondered about for some time. Now, since your darling little fishy here is an assembly of shapes, would it not be an easy thing to transfer the design over to a vector now?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GoblinQueeen In reply to Stacey73 [2005-01-21 12:13:46 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't say easy, but it could be done, the main thing is, I don't have the program to do it, though I've been very close to purchasing it in the last couple of days. I'm trying to decide between Illustrator and Flash.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |