HOME | DD
GR3G0R —
MI-Contest :moon:
Published: 2005-10-10 07:08:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 17440; Favourites: 555; Downloads: 3637
Redirect to original
Description
The moon landing, emoticon style.But wait a second?? Lights?? Cameras?? Fake background setting??
conspiracy...
Related content
Comments: 569
since this is a DD you'll probably never see this message... but maybe....
first.. great emoticon.. i never comment on theese cause I don't really see the point, but this one's great... it coulda ran long for max effect, but then you'd just be waiting.. it's smootha dn it gets to the point... funny shit!!!
just wondering have you ever seen "the video" ????
you should if you haven;t...you're peice reminded me of it and I just started laughing...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thanks 
and nope I haven't seen "the video", what is that? A movie/documentary about the moon landing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
there's a really good documentary out there about the moon landing... but I forgt what that one's called... as for this video, this is a short spoof film about the moon landing hoax.. it's really funny.... almost exactly like your deviation...
check it out >>>>>>>>>>> [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yah someone here posted a link to that (but to a GIF version)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
From a humerous standpoint, this thing kicks ass lol, but it's bull crap cause if they used the 'different angled shadows' thing, then the poeple would be casting 2 shadows, not 1. Sorry bout that just kind of annoys me. It's good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh yeah, that's true. But I also believe that it's because the sun (light source) is so big for the moon. I don't know how to explain, hopefully you know what I mean though
oh and thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Possibly, maybe it was just the equipment they used, back then it probably wasn't the top of the line filming, espicially if they used it in space, some things probably didn't look all that realisitc. Who knows lol, I think it's best not thinking about it personally, politics sucks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Possibly possibly
But I doubt a camera (however old) could change so much, espeicially angles of shadows. But I'm sure there's reasonable scientific reasons for most accusations
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I really love this. It's so adorable how he slides away like nothing happened XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I remember I saw this mocumentary about the moon landing. The producers actually got some rather high-up government officials to say on camera that it was all faked. In reality, its most likely that they did fake the moon landing, but we will always remain none the wiser.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hehehe. Cute.
I always knew it was a conspiracy
~Tal
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This is really cool and funny.. hhehe I 've been smiling since the moment I saw it. Very nice. I like how you have the DA (studio) background. hehe
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's so cute xD Great idea!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
very cool & funny I like how the camera dude pauses & runs
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So there isn't really a moon? Its jus one big conspiracy to confus us all? Awn 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, the moon is actually the light from a spotlight shown from America, and you can see it because the light hits the dust particles in the far distance, and it looks like a spherical moon.
And the 'moon' in the sky changes to half-moons and full-moons because that's just people walking past the spotlight very slowly and leaving a shadow behind
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Congratulate for the DF, it's hilarious!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have a GIF of someone doing something similar. It looks like the real first landing from the 60's and it sayd "live from the moon" and everything. But then this big light falls down and you see all these people in regular clothesrush over there to pick up the peices that have fallen.
Yours is awesome too though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh yeah? Haha! I'd like to see that
and thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it is true you know.there a lot of reasons that prove the first-man-on-da-moon was fake
too bad i don't remember them all
i like the emote
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
yeah, although most of the reasons have been prooved to be false.
I don't really care though, I think it makes things more interesting to believe it was a conspiracy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And then you have scientists determining exact distances of stars and the projection of asteroids by seeing their 'shadows' pass in front of stars. I don't buy that for a second. The only way we can determine all that is if we TRIANGULATE an area in 3d space, which requires 4 points to be occupied. So unless we have some help from external sources there is no way our scientists and astronomers can be getting this information.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>