HOME | DD

boIide In reply to ??? [2014-01-23 20:22:10 +0000 UTC]

omg pixel for the third time

i am da pixie finder

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mythical-Pixel In reply to boIide [2014-01-24 06:58:57 +0000 UTC]

Where's waldo pixel

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

boIide In reply to Mythical-Pixel [2014-01-24 12:37:45 +0000 UTC]

right here

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

griffsnuff In reply to Tarantula-Arts [2012-08-15 03:45:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

griffsnuff In reply to HexagonalHyena [2012-06-21 09:16:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much ;U; <33

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

griffsnuff In reply to Samuel-Hardidge [2012-05-25 10:32:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you :'D <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

griffsnuff In reply to Yavos [2012-05-25 10:33:41 +0000 UTC]

xD Cartoons rarely are 100% accurate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yavos In reply to griffsnuff [2012-05-25 10:38:54 +0000 UTC]

Of course not. But if you look at it and wonder how it's possible the head doesn't lay on the ground (which I actually wonder about some plants, too...) it's a bit strange. Even for cartoon characters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

griffsnuff In reply to Yavos [2012-05-25 14:19:17 +0000 UTC]

xD im sorry but I have no idea what you are talking about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yavos In reply to griffsnuff [2012-05-25 17:29:14 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, seems I should think more about what I write and actually read again what I'm answering to. xD
By "of course not" I actually meant that cartoons don't need to be 100% accurate. And the rest is just about me wondering how such a tiny body can keep such a huge head over ground level. (And that I actually wonder why some plants with these enormous huge blossoms still grow upwards. xD)

I hope that clears up some of the confusion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

griffsnuff In reply to Yavos [2012-05-25 18:40:59 +0000 UTC]

To answer your first questions, its cartoon, which mean limbs are not naturalistic etc, have you never seen cartoons before or something? xD since when did they make any sense. A huge flower as a face is even weirder than a huge head. To keep something up you only need mucles, and seeing how this creature doesnt exist all kinds of weird explenation can be given to why this or that.

The second is alos answered bu the top, As long as something is made up, it does not have to have naturalistic features to make sense, this character is as light as a seed from a dandelion, that doesnt even make any sense seeing how her size is actually around a small canine. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yavos In reply to griffsnuff [2012-05-25 18:57:43 +0000 UTC]

I guess we can stop that discussion now. I agree with you. That I was wondering about it doesn't mean I don't know about cartoon physics. (It's probably just that it's more appealing when it looks more natural to me and I thought I should mention it.)

Also you seem to have some fun because of me, so I'm happy with it. :3

PS
There are cartoons out there which make sense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

griffsnuff In reply to Yavos [2012-05-26 02:02:03 +0000 UTC]

xD The issue here is that flora makes sense to me, i dont feel her features arent working like you are saying, which is why im trying to figure out why you feel they are off. Just look at the gigantic eyes of mlp:fim/powerpuff girls, thats insanely overdone, but it doesnt matter on cartoons because they work x3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yavos In reply to griffsnuff [2012-05-26 11:52:53 +0000 UTC]

Okay... maybe I shouldn't have said that. Her features are working. But she looks a little bit of "fragile" to me.
Also it's not like it doesn't make sense to me. In fact the more I think about it the more I see the connection to real flowers and therefore it makes sense again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

griffsnuff In reply to Yavos [2012-05-26 15:18:40 +0000 UTC]

xD if she looks fragile, that is perfect, shes supposta be a flower spirit. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yavos In reply to griffsnuff [2012-05-26 20:05:37 +0000 UTC]

Good thing this is settled now.
(Also I like how you make the impression of always having fun when replying to me. )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0