HOME | DD

Published: 2013-03-16 11:39:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 11563; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 103
Redirect to original
Description
One of the most radical rocket aircraft projects was the Soviet "IVS/ISF" ("Army Escort Fighter"/"Navy Escort Fighter") design. It was proposed by military engineer Lev Golovin in 1941. Evidently, the world's smallest fighter was designed as a part of mobile launcher complex comprising a truck carrier, 5-8 meter launcher, fuel and ammunition stock, a winch and the fighter itself. A crew of three (pilot, mechanic, driver) was to operate this complex.The IVS specifications were: Length - 3m, span - 1.75m, height - 1.05m, T/O weight - 250-300kg, Top speed - 1,060km/h Ceiling - 7,500m Engine - one Dushkin liquid-fuel rocket (300kg thrust), assisted during take-off by solid fuel rocket booster(s) (1,000kg thrust). Armament - single 20-mm ShVAK cannon Landing equipment comprised the 76 m² parachute and a belly skid absent on the Navy version. Pilot occupied prone position that reduced the g-load and enabled the climb rate of 250m/sec. The project was offered for series production but the VVS authorities rejected the idea of a mobile small interceptor in favor of anti-aircraft artillery.
Cheers
Related content
Comments: 17
BULLETPROOFCHEETAH [2018-12-05 11:45:58 +0000 UTC]
Haulin' to the Callin'! This is good stuff!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Arklyte84826 [2018-02-28 05:37:12 +0000 UTC]
And they did right by rejecting it. Germany had lacked high altitude strategic bombers en masse and AA artillery could handle everything just fine... if it had proper numbers and ammo Germans could have used a project like this though. Even if it had developed proximity fuzes back when it could have changed the situation and mass produced more complex jet fighters and interceptors. Yes, they had Natter in developement, but it was launched from prepared build concrete and steel launch pads. This little thing was envisioned to be launched from a truck if your other picture is right. So it could cover the moving troops.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Enrico1946 [2013-08-14 13:43:30 +0000 UTC]
Beautifully done I love how this is artwork is done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WarTechArms [2013-07-30 16:12:43 +0000 UTC]
I speak Russian.
"Массивных запуска" means (literal translation) "massive (as "heavy" in plural) launch (as in negative, e.g. "no launch")".
Better use "массовый пуск".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HamzaLippisch In reply to WarTechArms [2013-07-30 16:19:19 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your notice, i was notified of that elsewhere i guess google translator is not perfect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WarTechArms In reply to HamzaLippisch [2013-07-30 17:49:03 +0000 UTC]
No problem.
Heh, you should translate word by word to get more accurate results, but yes, Russian is much more complicated than English
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HamzaLippisch In reply to WarTechArms [2013-07-30 18:35:12 +0000 UTC]
In soviet russia language speaks you
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HamzaLippisch In reply to Tank50us [2013-04-12 11:42:51 +0000 UTC]
Agree, its a very unusual design..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
carlhh In reply to Tank50us [2013-03-17 20:54:13 +0000 UTC]
Not really. Germany had the Me 163 Komet.
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rOEN911 [2013-03-16 14:18:54 +0000 UTC]
i believe thats by far your best render/plane i like it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rekalnus [2013-03-16 12:00:52 +0000 UTC]
Like your use of the weathered colors for the craft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1