HOME | DD

Published: 2010-01-11 15:40:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4051; Favourites: 61; Downloads: 152
Redirect to original
Description
Iron Maiden - RainmakerRelated content
Comments: 37
emtunc [2010-01-28 23:35:44 +0000 UTC]
If I take one picture in RAW format, will I need to change the exposure from this one picture and save them as 3-5 different files or is there an easier way?
Nice tutorial btw
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to emtunc [2010-01-28 23:54:13 +0000 UTC]
as photomatix support .raw format you are able to just use one raw file to create a hdr image though I have find it more rewarding with having 3 different exposures in .raw format
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ludovic-Delespierre [2010-01-15 15:03:56 +0000 UTC]
Helpfull!
Do you know if AEB exist on nikon d 90?i always do to setting of exposure in photoshop but not during the shot.it is very very annoying with the high exposure because i lost many details.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to Ludovic-Delespierre [2010-01-15 17:31:17 +0000 UTC]
it should exist on your camera, check your settings
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ludovic-Delespierre In reply to Hellraidgr [2010-01-16 19:13:56 +0000 UTC]
ok i will search this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ludovic-Delespierre In reply to Ludovic-Delespierre [2010-01-17 13:26:33 +0000 UTC]
ok it's the bracketing!
But we must take 3 photo in this way no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mr-Heli [2010-01-14 02:57:04 +0000 UTC]
wow, thanks for sharing, maybe I will try one day
I really never knew how to make it.. I know now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrandonCWatson [2010-01-12 00:21:06 +0000 UTC]
I've found that when first taking your multiple shots, it's best to lock down the aperture and only change the shutter speed to obtain the various exposures, that way the depth-of-field will not change, giving a better result.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to BrandonCWatson [2010-01-12 07:35:18 +0000 UTC]
true, works really good with 5 different exposures too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aliatvisilisntle [2010-01-11 22:15:40 +0000 UTC]
awesome job jesper
i've come to find that i don't have the AEB thing, but i do have RAW. So what would I do then?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to aliatvisilisntle [2010-01-11 22:17:36 +0000 UTC]
just take a raw picture but instead of clicking generate hdr image just go file then open and open up your picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aliatvisilisntle In reply to Hellraidgr [2010-01-11 22:19:47 +0000 UTC]
awesome, i'll try that out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aliatvisilisntle In reply to Hellraidgr [2010-01-11 23:44:51 +0000 UTC]
ok, so now my issue is noise. And I have a SHIT LOAD of it )):
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to aliatvisilisntle [2010-01-12 07:35:36 +0000 UTC]
try reduce noise filters : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
coulombic In reply to Hellraidgr [2010-01-15 03:22:23 +0000 UTC]
HDR is so, so overdone, man. It's overdone, and it's honestly pretty ugly. It destroys natural contrasts, induces noise, and makes everything look straight out of an LSD-Disney nightmare gone horribly awry. I think too many people use HDR, the effect, in lieu of "good" photography. As to say, lighting, composition, thought, planning. Nope, with HDR, they just slam the tripod down, fire their three shots mindlessly, and they're done.
Thus, to sum things up, HDR is the modern equivalent of the velvet painting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hellraidgr In reply to coulombic [2010-01-15 13:43:41 +0000 UTC]
not really, I usually do my shots manually, up to 7 different exposures
👍: 0 ⏩: 0