HOME | DD

HyperDragoonHx — Alolan Scrafty

#scrafty #pokemonsunandmoon #alolaform
Published: 2017-08-16 14:12:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 1213; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description Commission by sketchesfromaguywithpens.tumbl… Before Kommo-o was introduced, I had my own idea for a Dragon/Fighting type: an Alola form for Scrafty. its ability, Twin Strike, functions like Parental Bond, except the second hit does the same amount of damage or possibly higher if a move like Power-Up Punch is used. So basically, this Alola form for Scrafty is both a callout for a needed Dragon/Fighting type and an improvement to a 2 hits in one turn ability.
Related content
Comments: 8

Ashbini [2017-08-16 14:14:52 +0000 UTC]

Why not ground fairy? imagine this strong Pokemon having adapted to the calm life style of alola there by developing the fairy type!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperDragoonHx In reply to Ashbini [2017-08-16 14:16:26 +0000 UTC]

Well, this was commissioned before Kommo-o was introduced, but you're right, a ground/fairy type is needed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ashbini In reply to HyperDragoonHx [2017-08-16 14:22:10 +0000 UTC]

               

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperDragoonHx In reply to Ashbini [2017-08-16 14:24:42 +0000 UTC]

We also need Bug/Dragon, Electric/Fighting, Ground/Fighting, and all the other dual types that haven't been done yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ashbini In reply to HyperDragoonHx [2017-08-16 14:28:02 +0000 UTC]

there is a reason some of these don't go together, that is because they would be kinda op.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperDragoonHx In reply to Ashbini [2017-08-16 14:29:55 +0000 UTC]

We have a Fire/Water Volcanion, so it would make sense that all the dual type combinations should be completed like Fire/Ice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ashbini In reply to HyperDragoonHx [2017-08-16 15:36:23 +0000 UTC]

i think he more has the "i'm a mythical" excuse. Odd typing would be you have the type that cause your second type to be "immune " to the normal supper effective attack. like water and electric. Going off that. if it renders more than the a set five types to be less effiective then it would be "broken"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperDragoonHx In reply to Ashbini [2017-08-16 15:57:19 +0000 UTC]

I don't think the typing is broken at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0