HOME | DD

iceworx — primitive.construkt v2

Published: 2005-09-23 21:38:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 363; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 45
Redirect to original
Description This image is about one's ability to reinvent one's self. Now for the technical stuff:

Made with Bryce + Photoshop.

Original model used: [link]

I kinda forget how long the Bryce render took.. it wasn't long. But it was done so long ago that it probably doesn't matter anymore. Photoshopping this thing took nearly 9 hours though, almost 90 layers, and a lot of saving and restarting the computer because my page file kept hitting around 2gb's and PS just would not cooperate. Please let me know what you guys think

edit: I moved the original to Scraps, and submit this one instead. There's some changes in visual elements, and color hue/saturation/gradation changes as well.
Related content
Comments: 9

Greenwolf103 [2005-09-28 03:07:57 +0000 UTC]

AWESOME!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

prophet805 [2005-09-23 22:31:15 +0000 UTC]

let me see if i got this:
the idea is that in order for one to reinvent his/herself, one must look instead, realizing his/her full potential, empowering one with that creative energy that he/she can use to define his/herself.
something like that, maybe?
anyway, this is a sic image

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iceworx In reply to prophet805 [2005-09-23 22:38:35 +0000 UTC]

That's definitely the idea... using what you have to come up with something new. I've been in kind of a slump for pretty much the last year... and haven't been happy with anything I've put together until recently. Hopefully this is the start of something different. Thanks for the comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

prophet805 In reply to iceworx [2005-09-23 23:40:30 +0000 UTC]

so why "primitive" construct?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iceworx In reply to prophet805 [2005-09-24 01:12:36 +0000 UTC]

because the key elements are built out of primitives... or models.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

prophet805 In reply to iceworx [2005-09-24 05:42:57 +0000 UTC]

oh. aight

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

izumizagari [2005-09-23 21:52:16 +0000 UTC]

90 Layers?!?!

Looks awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iceworx In reply to izumizagari [2005-09-23 21:56:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

softcell72 [2005-09-23 21:45:31 +0000 UTC]

much better, I like this one. not sure what it was about the other one that rubbed me wrong which is why I didn't comment on it.
but this one doesn't have the same problem..whatever that was..lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0