HOME | DD

Published: 2010-03-12 02:35:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 5144; Favourites: 58; Downloads: 375
Redirect to original
Description
I'd recommend clicking download to full-view, there's a lot to see.With their cities being shelled from nearly over the horizon, the Vulpesants needed a way to strike back at Venrock targets. The Arkii provided rocket technology to the Vulpesants since before the war, and this was by far their crowning achievement. Known as the Arkii Mark 5 Long Range Missile, it was carried in pieces within its launching vehicle, assembled in the field, and fired at any target within one thousand miles. The three stage rocket attained sub-orbital flight and could strike a target one quarter mile wide or larger accurately, and was very effective in bombarding naval installations, military and air bases. These vehicles would be deployed in formations of eight, and would fire as their own respective rockets had been assembled, leading their Venrock targets to refer to them as “Falling Fire”. They would be accompanied by APCs which would carry full rocket assemblies to resupply the launch vehicle.
The rocket itself is a three stage machine, with the first boosters burning for only ten seconds before breaking away. In those ten seconds, though, the rocket was accelerated to nearly six hundred milers per hour, and attained an altitude of almost one mile. The first stage boosters disengage and fall away, while the second stage ignites simultaneously. A timing mechanism working in conjunction with a compass, gravitational sensor and altimeter detects the rockets angle, time of flight and position, and adjusts its course as necessary. The second stage burns out and breaks away at the apex of the flight, seventy to eighty miles high, and the final stage, which contains the warhead and a sizeable rocket, kicks in and burns for just over a minute. The warhead can be set to detonate on impact with the ground or any hard object, or explode at a set altitude. The final stage can be equipped with a massive high explosive warhead, a cluster bomb, and even incendiary charges.
Cluster bombs were used extensively while attacking Venrock airship bases, as they were set to explode over the tarmacs, destroying the craft that were parked there. Incendiary rounds were also successfully used against fuel depots and oil fields off the coast of Venrock Country, facilities so heavily defended the Venrock high command did not believe they had been attacked so effectively till they had surveyed the damage themselves. Venrock air forces were deployed to hunt down the launch vehicles, but were met with very little success. Traveling in small groups of no more than 24 vehicles, these thorns in the Venrocks sides would fire several barrages of rockets, then relocate or hide, camouflaging their tanks and APCs to vanish in the dense brush of Vulpesant Country. If capture seemed an imminent threat, crews were instructed to detonate whatever warheads they had within their vehicle with the hatches closed and dogged down, to maximize their destructive capabilities. Any rocket fuel would add to the ensuing explosion and fireball, leaving the Venrock forces with little to examine.
The vehicle used to launch and assemble these rockets is a modified heavy equipment and supply carrier. A well trained crew can build a MK5 in little over an hour, and can have its launch readiness tests done within thirty minutes after that. It is then lifted into position and fired after the crew locks the vehicle down and clears the area. Only one technician, known as the “Fireman” remains behind to fire the rocket.
Related content
Comments: 16
WaneBlade [2011-02-13 06:21:45 +0000 UTC]
I'd like to take this moment to express in my personal opinion and perspective the thoughts on which are for the purpose for me to state that this is in fact... a big tank.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to WaneBlade [2011-02-14 14:27:34 +0000 UTC]
Lol, a big, missile launching tank.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jackmcslay [2010-03-12 16:03:24 +0000 UTC]
Looks cool, but overly complicated.
I don't see any sense on having to assemble the rockets on the spot. It looks like it takes a very long time to assemble and fire. Meanwhile, a sneaky enemy soldier could toss an explosive inside the cargo bay while it's assemblying, potentially detonating all the rockets, desntroying the vehicle and any other troops near it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to jackmcslay [2010-03-12 16:51:49 +0000 UTC]
You didn't read my description, did you? The Venrocks maintained air superiority during the war, meaning they could potentially attack and destroy permanent stationary launch sites. It takes a crew just over an hour and a half to assemble, ready and fire a rocket, and they take up much less room inside the vehicle disassembled. Also, there's no way someone's just going to "sneak" up to one of these while they're prepping a rocket. Not only would it be well defended, but non of the doors would be open while an assembly is being completed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jackmcslay In reply to JazzLizard [2010-03-12 21:29:03 +0000 UTC]
You missed my point completely.
I don't see an advantage on having to assemble the rockets because it would be much quicker and safer if it simply carried pre-assembled rockets, raised them and fired. That and rockets are too high precision equipment to be something you can easily
Less room? I frankly don't see why...
Also, the presence of a powerful enemy armada makes it even worse, there's no way a mobile missile launcher can be better protected than a stationary one, not when you make it so big that it kills any possibility to convincingly conceal it.
If their enemy aerial armada makes short work of stationary bases so easily, what chances does a mobile one have of withstanding such attack?
Successfully attacking a stationary military base is typically 10X harder than attacking a squadron of ground units, due to the limited ammo and firepower that moving units can carry, while stationary bases can defend themselves with the most powerful weapons in one's army and stock themselves with enough ammo to last for days
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to jackmcslay [2010-03-12 23:15:53 +0000 UTC]
I don't think I missed your point at all. You don't know anything about Midden, Vulpesant Country, or the history of the war. Vulpesant Country is covered mostly in dense forests, allowing vehicles such as this to hide very easily and effectively, much like the V2 sites during WW2. The factories that produce arms and armor for the Vulpesants are well hidden within mountain complexes and even a few undersea facilities. Venrock forces lack RADAR and night vision, so most Vulpesant military movements are done under the cover of darkness. Launching these rockets from stationary bases would clearly give their location away, and attract massive attacks from the Venrock Airborne Corps.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jackmcslay In reply to JazzLizard [2010-03-13 08:21:29 +0000 UTC]
What kind of trees do those forests have? Sequoias?
There is a HUGE difference between this and the real-life weapons of similar function. In real cases, they travel disassembled and are then assembled on the spot and fired. In order to hide war vehicles, you need the forests' trees to have treetops about as wide as the vehicle itself, otherwise you're going to leave a very obvious path of destruction that leads to the vehicle.
Either way, such a large payload just makes no sense. If it were a single-rocket vehicle it would be much smaller and more practical, probably actually capable of concealing themselves within forests. A weapon as slow as one round for every 1.5 hours really doesn't need a self-contained ammo storage
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to jackmcslay [2010-03-13 15:08:36 +0000 UTC]
Here's when I stop listening to you. Path of destruction? Um...ROADS through the forest from nearly a thousand years of civilized habitation. The Germans pulled this, almost exactly, off during WW2, yes, they didn't assemble their rockets on site, but I thought it would be a novel idea, and don't see anything wrong with it if the craftsmanship was top notch and they had ample reasoning to do so. The missile only has a range of about one thousand miles, so they would need to move it within its operational range of a target to fire it. They want to be able to fire one or two rocket, then engage another target. Only carrying one fully assembled piece seems much less efficient than my method.
You also need to keep in mind that while I try to base my creations on realistic scenarios, this is Science Fiction, and you frantically digging for flaws is getting really annoying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jackmcslay In reply to JazzLizard [2010-03-13 17:58:16 +0000 UTC]
Roads? Something this big is sure to destroy any roads it tries to cross over. Putting this thing in the middle of a forest would inevitably require to put down hundreds of trees, which defeats the possibility of hiding it in forests completely.
It's not that moving rocket platforms aren't useful, there are several ways to make them useful and keep them hidden from the view of aerial units. But having a non-disassemblable one that is so large it can't maneuver between trees without putting them down, and with so much payload that if it's destroyed it can destroy a large ammount of allies with it is NOT how you do it.
There's a big difference between something that is tactically feasible and something that is technically feasible .
The latter is generally acceptable, the former is not. Because you can assume that a future technology may make something we can't do today a possibility, but not make practical designs that aren't good for reasons other than technological.
Take the AT-ATs from Star Wars, for example (the large 4-legged walkers that appeared on the icy moon in episode V). They were slow, yet powerful enough to blow a large shield generator with blasters at full power, and also doubled as troop or vehicle carriers. And despite their size, they wouldn't leave easily traceable tracks because they would simply avoid stepping on trees while the body goes over them, which would presumably be more power-consuming if it were made a hover vehicle instead. So, it has obvious tactical advantages as well as shortcomings (small fighters can tie up their feet).
However, blindly resorting to gigantism without giving a deep thought about practicality and how exactly it's size gives them an advantage against other units will just cause hard sci-fi fans to write it off as bad writing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to jackmcslay [2010-03-14 05:33:58 +0000 UTC]
Again you're assuming things without asking. This thing is large, but by no means gigantic. It's about 10.5 meters (35 feet) across, 25 meters long and 9 meters tall. The roads that web across all of inhabited land on Midden are easily wide enough to accommodate these vehicles traveling in single file. The door on the front of the vehicle is 1.5 meters tall, you'd need to duck to get in and out, but it should give you a decent sense of scale.
The only trees that would be cleared would be occasionally to create staging areas, even though there are plenty of such clearings found throughout the forest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
triadenforcer [2010-03-12 13:23:22 +0000 UTC]
all this tech....and still no nukes....
as for the LRML......why not give it some guns of it's own?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JazzLizard In reply to triadenforcer [2010-03-12 14:20:53 +0000 UTC]
Atomic weapons were used, I just haven't got to them yet. And as for guns, the launch vehicle isn't armored enough to see combat of any kind, it would be well protected by a group of mechanized infantry vehicles and tanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0