HOME | DD

Published: 2011-10-23 18:17:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 5253; Favourites: 81; Downloads: 46
Redirect to original
Description
Welcome back to Classics of Crap, where I take a look at some of the most notorious cinematic stinkers of all time, and illustrate them. Last week, I examined the movie that killed the Batman franchise, (for a while, anyway). This week, I think it's only fair that I look at the movie that killed the Superman franchise- the odious Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.I was 9 when this movie came out, and was already a die hard Superman fan. This movie holds a special place in my heart as the first movie I can remember walking out of thinking it was a horrible, horrible disappointment. So now, nearly 25 years later, how does it old up? Not well, I'm afraid. The effects still look incredibly bad, even worse than the original Superman made 10 years earlier. The jokes aren't funny, but much unintentional humor comes from hammy performance by Mark Pillow as the evil Nuclear Man. I blame schlock-merchant producers Golan-Globus for slashing the budget so far as the director had to recycle shots of Superman flying over and over again. So, should you watch this? Sure, it's 90 minutes of goofy, awful fun. Best part? When Nuclear Man kidnaps Star 80 and takes her into outer space. Where she can breathe. WTF?
Related content
Comments: 14
xxxMrConductor06xxx [2020-11-19 04:16:02 +0000 UTC]
It is considered to be the "Batman & Robin" of Superman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Reduxist [2011-10-23 18:29:55 +0000 UTC]
That's the one with Richard Pryor in it, right? Wasn't he supposed to be a comedian?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
JeffVictor In reply to Reduxist [2011-10-23 18:56:18 +0000 UTC]
You're thinking of the other crap Superman movie- Superman 3. Pryor was a popular comedian at the time, known for his graphic and controversial race jokes, so it made perfect sense to cast him in a PG kid's movie. :S
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Scorching-Whirlwind In reply to JeffVictor [2014-11-07 13:15:49 +0000 UTC]
I don't see what's so bad about Superman III. Sure it's nowhere near as good as the first and second, but I really don't think it was that bad. I thought Pryor's invilvement was an interesting addition too.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Reduxist In reply to JeffVictor [2011-10-25 03:54:07 +0000 UTC]
So naturally his jokes sucked?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1