HOME | DD

Published: 2011-10-14 07:48:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 16730; Favourites: 437; Downloads: 378
Redirect to original
Description
Professional Military Solutions Corporation is an up-and-coming mercenary firm that focuses on providing naval asset support for independent system garrisons, ground-oriented mercenary companies, and to engage in high-threat counterpiracy and marauder eradication operations. As the core of the company’s asset profile is based around their ships, it made perfect sense for PMSC to invest the 1.2 billion credits to construct their own shipyards and armaments factories to produce vessels ranging from fighters to battlecruisers. This is one of those vessels.Due to the large number of Namaran pilots within the company, the designers wanted to create a fighter that could be flown by Humans and Namarans, but also be able to make the best use of the Namaran’s superhuman agility and perception. To achieve that, the engineers stepped outside of the box a bit and looked at the maneuverability dynamics of conventional gravitic drives. In general, the location of a gravitic drive is somewhat less important than older pulsed fusion drives, largely because of the bubble effect. This is the principle where the entire craft is enveloped in the gravitic field of the engine in a fashion not unlike a bubble, and the bubble itself moves with the vessel being relatively static within.
In his research, chief engineer Kurtis Rayburn noticed that the midship placement of the primary maneuvering and propulsion gravitic drives in the Spartan Group mercenary company’s Xyphon-class frigate was directly responsible for that ship’s legendary maneuverability. Studying the interaction between the fields, he determined that it wasn’t the midship placement, but the interaction between the fields generated by the four primary engines spaced equilaterally around the vessel in the engine nacelle ring. Further research into this led to a more streamlined and scaled-down engine layout designed for a fighter to allow it to outmaneuver just about anything else out there. And thus, the unusual quad-wing design of the Talon was born.
The Talon is armed with five primary energy weapons- four wing-mounted 80mm pulsed AP lancers and a spinal-mount 130mm heavy APPC with the barrel emitter in the bow. The use of anti-proton particle weapons in a fighter obviously requires additional polarity inverters to convert hydrogen taken in through the ramscoops into anti-hydrogen, and then refine this into charged particles which fuel the AP weaponry. However, in the case of the lancers the wings proved to have sufficient room to fit these systems in amidst the reinforced superstructure and microreactors, allowing each wing to act independent of the rest of the craft. The end result- disabling one wing, or even the primary reactor in the main hull, does not cripple these weapons.
The Talon is primarily an interceptor, which are normally light on missile payload. Missiles in 24th century combat are primarily anti-ship weapons, largely due to the relative lack of maneuverability and the significantly deadlier yield being wasted on a fighter. However, the Talon carries a payload of twenty SRMs and eight LRMs, far more than most interceptors, housed in the main body in a cylindrical magazine around the APPC spinal. The launch ports for these missiles are two fore, two aft, both in the ventral hull. This fore-and-aft dispersion allows the Talon to fire SRMs at pursuing fighters without the usual launch-to-contact delays due to missile aspect changes.
Nor are the aft missile batteries the only defensive capabilities of the Talon. In addition to its phenomenal agility in both space and atmo, it has an aft-mounted 40mm AP lancer turret for missile defense and counter-fighter fire, as well as a short-range FragMaster disruptor cannon designed to wreak havoc with the electronics of pursuing craft. The electron arrestor and photon attractor fields play hell with even the most advanced non-hardened networks and electronics, and can often disable forward shield generators to soften a target up for the defensive weapons.
The vulnerability of the Talon is an attack from directly perpendicular- either directly above, below, or to the sides of the craft- due to the lack of an omnidirectional weapon system such as dorsal/ventral turrets and the like. However, this vulnerability is common among interceptors, and pilots learn to avoid turning their flanks to an enemy.
Related content
Comments: 62
hotwaxonlobsters [2011-10-16 07:09:20 +0000 UTC]
I once heard an F-22 fighter pilot describe her craft as the closest thing on this earth to an X-wing. The ISF-20 not only bridges the gap, but radically improves upon the fundamentals of both. This is clearly a super-fighter, outclassing all opposition. I love it, and I love that the description of the Reaper indicates that the two craft were designed to be companion ships. They'd make an amazing combination. If you could add a pair of turrets, one dorsal and one ventral, similar to the one in the rear, that'd take care of the "lack of omnidirectional weapon systems" problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Breandan-OCiarrai In reply to hotwaxonlobsters [2011-10-16 14:50:17 +0000 UTC]
The lack of turrets is more of a technical restraint than an artistic oversight. There is a pre-established set of technological rules for the vehicles and ships of the Dark Nova universe, in this case the concept of reactor banks and capacitors being the limitation. The Talon has, quite simply, maximized its energy weapon loadout and reached the limits of what its reactors can handle without browning-out the fighter. If there was a way to fit more reactors in, then additional weapons could be added. However, as an interceptor- designed to rapidly intercept and engage incoming enemy fighters and small craft- the focus was put on forward weapons and maneuverability instead.
And yes, the Reaper and Talon were designed by the same mercenary firm to compliment one another
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hotwaxonlobsters In reply to Breandan-OCiarrai [2011-10-16 21:52:17 +0000 UTC]
Makes perfect sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jepray In reply to hotwaxonlobsters [2011-10-16 11:38:32 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much! as for adding a giant turret to the back, nah, can't have everything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
screenscan [2011-10-16 05:53:46 +0000 UTC]
the jets look fantastamazing!
(never said that though )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to screenscan [2011-10-16 11:32:56 +0000 UTC]
lo, SPaceships, nothing in Dark Nova is jet powered...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
screenscan In reply to Jepray [2011-10-16 12:19:55 +0000 UTC]
??
i just meant the fuse engine (or whatever you wanna call this)
(so if its not jet powered how is this powered?)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
screenscan In reply to Jepray [2011-10-17 09:04:52 +0000 UTC]
so allright damnit
i meant
the grav engines look really great
there now you havit!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Breandan-OCiarrai In reply to screenscan [2011-10-16 14:43:18 +0000 UTC]
if you read the description you'll notice that the very core of the design was based around the interaction between the fields of gravitic drives, which are what power it, both for propulsion and maneuvering
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
screenscan In reply to Breandan-OCiarrai [2011-10-17 09:06:19 +0000 UTC]
(in all honesty the text is allways so much, and the design so great, that i almost never read the text. maybe if your game is easy to learn/play ill start doing this
but i like what you are doing!!
cheers mate)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MegaO93 [2011-10-15 23:22:01 +0000 UTC]
very awesome
but IMO it looks so close like the X-Wing, in the form and some bit the colors anyways NICE
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to MegaO93 [2011-10-16 00:21:07 +0000 UTC]
it could go either way really thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
m4a44 [2011-10-15 20:57:36 +0000 UTC]
Now THAT is a sleek and sexy looking fighter!
LOVE the 4 separate engine design
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Colourbrand [2011-10-15 15:00:11 +0000 UTC]
She reminds me of the Thunderbolt - but a hellualot better - and phenomially well armed! Once again you have created a masterpiece of sensible sci-fi engineering!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
denisejf In reply to Colourbrand [2015-10-21 16:00:53 +0000 UTC]
This would make a nice version for an updated version of the SA-23J Mitchell-Hyundyne 'Thunderbolt' Starfury. Maybe for Babylon 6? The ISA could use it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jepray In reply to Colourbrand [2011-10-15 15:35:53 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, the Thunderbolt was the driving ideal behind this one, and of course, i just had to make sure it works Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Colourbrand In reply to Jepray [2011-10-15 18:13:40 +0000 UTC]
Its better than the Thunderbolt.
SUPERB!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SimsDoc [2011-10-15 06:49:09 +0000 UTC]
That looks nothing like a X-Wing Or Dose it? Either Way its still a Good Concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to SimsDoc [2011-10-15 07:35:10 +0000 UTC]
No it doesn't, but that doesn't mean i wasn't thinking of one when i drew it...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rogue284 [2011-10-15 02:11:32 +0000 UTC]
Awesome. Reminds me a lot of the Thunderbolt-class Star Fury from Babylon 5
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to Rogue284 [2011-10-15 02:32:48 +0000 UTC]
Yup, it was hovering at the back of my mind, that and the X-wing...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rogue284 In reply to Jepray [2011-10-15 02:38:00 +0000 UTC]
Ah yes the X-Wing, most likely my favorite Sci-Fi ship ever. Growing up I didn't want to be a Jedi I wanted to be a member of Rogue Squadron!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to Rogue284 [2011-10-15 03:41:07 +0000 UTC]
it was a cool ship, and a cool game
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rogue284 In reply to Jepray [2011-10-15 04:53:18 +0000 UTC]
Yes, yes it was. I had the first game on PC rather than the 64. Loved it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SwordSaint001 [2011-10-14 18:35:23 +0000 UTC]
I really like your designs... I'm writing a Sci-Fi story and I am always looking for inspiration for my ship/mech designs... you are an inspiration!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to SwordSaint001 [2011-10-15 02:32:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, glad to be of help, if you have any questions please drop me a note im glad to answer any sane questions and some less sane questions...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SwordSaint001 In reply to Jepray [2011-10-17 17:59:42 +0000 UTC]
that's nice I have a good combo of both I could throw at ya
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SwordSaint001 In reply to Jepray [2011-10-18 18:21:15 +0000 UTC]
that my friend I will do I find your ideas very interesting and would like your input about some ideas i have for my story... er something like that... if it's ok with you.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to SwordSaint001 [2011-10-19 00:20:46 +0000 UTC]
that's fine first you wanna bounce ideals off me...just drop a note
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alighierian [2011-10-14 17:47:16 +0000 UTC]
well, if the X-wing fighters looked like this in Star Wars, i might have been interested xD
another nice design, jep
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
usafchimp [2011-10-14 17:38:45 +0000 UTC]
This looks a lot like a Super Starfury, but still way different. Very, very cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jepray In reply to usafchimp [2011-10-15 02:30:31 +0000 UTC]
Your talking about the Thunderbolt starfury a favorite of mine...thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
usafchimp In reply to Jepray [2011-10-15 18:57:48 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, that was it...had a brain fart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>