HOME | DD
jollyjack — Putin Powder
Published: 2018-03-09 00:05:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 25839; Favourites: 606; Downloads: 218
Redirect to original
Description
Russia's favourite topping (all potential rivals were convicted of criminal activity and disqualified).www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europ…
Related content
Comments: 195
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AhGYo…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pfffffft. Implying that Germans are any better than Russians.
America is the last free country on earth. Remember that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If that all you can anwer me, than keep dream, nazi fool. do not wine then you will f**ed with job by your own state.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
move out from mama's basement, before call me retard, mama's nazi.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you want to blame the Russian people for its politics that means I should be able to blame you for the American disaster too, right? The logic is the same...
I understand that art comments on the topics of the day, but politics is something that seems to be bringing out the most discrimination, hatred and violence in the individuals of the world right now: can we have more art that doesn't seem to bring this out in people please?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
America is the only free country left on earth you communist dingo. We spent billions and lost millions trying to end the Soviet Union only for those dictator loving Russian bastards to put a guy from the Soviets in.
Shame on you for associating Putin with Trump
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Listen what i will say, liithe ignorant cild. You blaming other in to dictature not knowin what it is. Same way you're hate communism and Soviet Union, you're even never see no one communist (only imagers), never been in socialist coutries, You're even not familiar with works of Karl Marks, Friedrich Engels or Vladimir Lenin. Only you know about communism is Lion Trotsky's bullshit and goverment farytales from hollywood.
You say what US only free coutry in the world. I see there two reasons to that, first: US occupied rest of the world and dictae their will with dollar and US military, second: you know nothing about other world. Bouth this reasons show your ignorence. Your state wasted billions of dollars for destroy home of hudreds of millons pepople, set war in their borders and ruin ecinomics of fifteen republics hwo worked like one piece. Soviet Union tryed to unite all people. US only destroy last tventy years.
And for reference
Dictature - is will of ruller class (Karl Marks). Democrasi is only form of this dictature, like monarchy or republic. Ancent Rome war democracy, bacauce it was republic, but in was slabary state
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I didn't associate Trump with Putin, the artist who's art you are commenting on did though:
"Putin's Poodle"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Russia causes like 50% of world problems indirectly. The other half is Germany and it's always up to the U.S to try and fix it. Only for eurofags to get jealous and hate us
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Russia causes like 50% of world problems"
That seems like an unusually high statistic, I sure would like to see some evide-
"indirectly"
oh...
"The other half is Germany"
Are you referring to their influence over the EU or historical stuff like the Second World War?
"and it's always up to the U.S to try and fix it"
What is the US doing to 'fix' anything that Germany's done?
How is funding separatist factions in Syria fixing anything?
How is trying to prevent Russia from piping gas to Europe or economically sanctioning them and their allies anything short of fanning the flames of the 'world problems' you accuse them of causing?
"Only for eurofags to get jealous and hate us"
Ausfag here. I don't hate you, it just seems like the US is too afraid to wear the mantle of being the American Empire but is too paranoid to actually leave the rest of the world alone and so we're stuck with the worst of both and the best of neither situation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WW1 Germany supported the damn filthy Automans and did a bunch of shit to make them hate the West. Not to mention they were the first to end the trend of "gentleman warfare" with lines of men marching side by side in secluded areas to avoid civilian casualties and invented Trench warfare to make it hell for everyone.
Also they escalated WW1.
WW2 They put another damn dictator in because they all have fetishes for them and because they were so damn edgy with killing Jews and minorities. Also they supported the Islamic nations in the middle east for their common hatred in Jews and set the mentality that the terrorists we see today have.
Also a billion other problems.
And they still cause problems today with their new fuhrer: Angela Merkel trying to let in the entire 3rd world.
As for Russia, they started communism. Which has killed more people than Nazism. And nearly blew up the world. Also they contributed to the shithole that is the middle east, alongside Germany and the damn British bastards.
We won WW2 to try and fix the shit the Germans caused. Also spent the entirety of the later half of the 20th century trying to stop all the trouble those damn red bastards were pulling. We still are trying to fix the problems the Cold war and WW2 brought today by hopelessly attempting to fix the middle East.
Don't even get me started on how much I hate England.
Australia? Oh boy we should be friends. Except you guys banned guns so yall must hate freedom. Also how does it feel to lose a war to fucking Emus?
And your welcome for saving your asses from the japs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"WW1 Germany supported the damn filthy Automans"
Well, they were locked out of the Anglo-French alliance and could only hope to form a power block against them and Russia by aligning with the Ottoman Empire. They didn't really have a choice.
"and did a bunch of shit to make them hate the West"
I'm not familiar with what they did but I'm hesitant to take your word for it as Germany would fall under the umbrella of 'West' and it'd be odd to do something that makes someone hate you, unless of course you're saying it was unintentional.
"they were the first to end the trend of "gentleman warfare""
Yeah, no. The advent of the machine gun made that a nonviable method of waging war. The fact that, as you say, they were the first to adopt trench warfare is hardly a moral failing on their part, it was a technological necessity. Given that the infantry tactics of the colonial period were out of the question and the tank hadn't been invented yet I'd challenge you to come up with a better idea.
"Also they escalated WW1."
Serbian terrorists assassinate the Arch Duke of Austria-Hungary.
Austria-Hungary escalated by invading Serbia.
Serbia escalated by invoking their alliance with the Russian Empire.
Russia escalated by mobilising for war.
Austria-Hungary escalated by invoking their alliance with the German Empire.
THEN Germany escalated WW1. Why didn't you didn't blame everyone who did that before them.
"WW2 They put another damn dictator in"
Hitler was in power for 6 years before WWII.
Furthermore, you say 'another damn dictator' as though the Kaiser was uniquely totalitarian compared to every other world leader at the time. Britain had a King, Russia had a Czar, Japan had an Emperor, etc. There's nothing special about Germany being a dictatorial monarchy at the time.
"because they all have fetishes for them"
I realise this conversation is happening in the comment section of a fetish artist, but you have to understand that not everything can be explained away by fetishism.
"and because they were so damn edgy with killing Jews and minorities."
Germany weren't the only people to have concentration camps or commit mass murder during WWII. Even the United States locked up citizens of Japanese descent and Britain was running concentration camps in South Africa forty years earlier.
"Also they supported the Islamic nations in the middle east for their common hatred in Jews"
I'm aware of the relationship between Germany and Persia and perhaps antisemitism played a part in that-
"and set the mentality that the terrorists we see today have."
-but this is just ignorance. If you think constant intervention in the Middle-East is of secondary importance to the diplomatic relations between a country that was destroyed over 70 years ago and several nations that have gone through regime changes, wars, revolutions and occupations since then, I don't know what to say, you're either uninformed or unintelligent.
"Also a billion other problems."
How insightful.
"And they still cause problems today with their new fuhrer: Angela Merkel trying to let in the entire 3rd world."
I actually agree 100% with you here. pics.me.me/when-you-see-angela…
"As for Russia, they started communism."
'Karl Marx was a German' ~ First five words of his wiki page. Ironic that you didn't mention that when writing about Germany.
"Which has killed more people than Nazism."
True.
"And nearly blew up the world."
Nearly. Though iirc; only the United States has used nuclear weapons on civilian population centres. As bad as communism is, at least they didn't do that.
"Also they contributed to the shithole that is the middle east, alongside Germany and the damn British bastards."
And don't forget that other country, what's it called? You know, the guys that bankrolled the Mujaheddin in the 80's that eventually reformed into Al-Qaeda. Oh yeah, the United States!
"We won WW2 to try and fix the shit the Germans caused."
Russia won it. They couldn't have done so without supplies from America but it was the Red Army that fought the Wehrmacht and SS when they were at their strongest, it was Russia that has it's cities leveled in the process and it was Russia that seized Berlin and ended the war in Europe. As for fixing 'the shit the Germans caused', why then did you lot wait until 1941 to start fixing 'the shit'? Sounds like the US's motivation was to oppose the USSR's expansion across Europe, not just to swoop in and implement the Marshall Plan. (Not that opposing the USSR is bad, but it'd be nice if we could be honest).
"Also spent the entirety of the later half of the 20th century trying to stop all the trouble those damn red bastards were pulling."
Do you think somewhere out there there's a Russia apologist saying 'we spent the entirety of the later half of the 20th century trying to stop all the trouble those damn bourgeois pigs were pulling.'?
"We still are trying to fix the problems the Cold war and WW2 brought today by hopelessly attempting to fix the middle East."
And you're sure facilitating the Iranian revolution (forcing the Shah to liberalise too quickly, leading to the conservative backlash), sanctioning Iraq throughout the 90's after the Gulf War, destroying Libya (whether or not the government used chemical weapons, the West still brutalised that nation and left it a smouldering ruin), creating the precursor to Al-Qaeda (back when the US used them to "stop all the trouble those damn red bastards were pulling") and being an ally of Israel (I'm not saying they shouldn't be, I'm just saying the consequence is foreseeable) didn't have something just a little bit more to do with it than the Cold War and WWII did?
"Don't even get me started on how much I hate England."
They've made mistakes.
"Australia? Oh boy we should be friends. Except you guys banned guns so yall must hate freedom."
John Howard was a pathetic leader and the National Firearms Agreement is the most sickening part of this country's law. You lot have problems but I'll readily admit you're not as fucked as us. (Technically guns aren't banned; personally I even manage to go out hunting every couple of months, but getting a licence is made as hard as possible).
"Also how does it feel to lose a war to fucking Emus?"
Also how does it feel to lose a war to impoverished fucking third world rice farmers?
"And your welcome for saving your asses from the japs."
Up until 1921, Japan were our allies. The Japanese Imperial Navy even escorted Australian shipping during WWI and they seized many Pacific islands formerly possessed by the German Empire.
Wanna know what happened in 1921?
At the 1921 Washington Naval Conference, the United States gave an ultimatum to Britain and Japan. Agree to not renew their alliance, and America will agree to capital ship building ratio limitations: Britain and America 5, Japan 3. If they refused, America, which had the economy to do so, would be under no obligation not to build a Navy beyond anything Japan and Britain could hope to match. The British accepted the American proposal.
It stands to reason that without allies and with harsh limits on Naval production, Japan knew it couldn't maintain it's status as a major power without gaining new territory and resources, thus; they invaded Manchuria. (Perhaps they foresaw that a united China would be insurmountable, if so they'd be right).
During the Sino-Japanese War, the US imposed an oil embargo on Japan that meant that soon they would no longer have the fuel needed to continue the war.
It was then, 20 years in the making, that Japan finally acted against the injustices that the US had perpetrated against them and THAT is the reason Australia was threatened by Japan.
Every Australian that died in the Pacific Theatre died because of the US, so you can appreciate why we aren't all so very grateful to you for 'saving our asses from the Japs'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
The 1921 Naval Conference was the diplomatic option that the US exercised to try to rein in the military build up of Imperial Japan, which had already demonstrated territorial expansion by annexing colonies when Germany and Spain vacated. Japan went on to construct the biggest battleship ever built : the Yamato, (rendered obsolete by aircraft carrier warfare, and never deployed).
Japan invaded Korea, Russia, Manchuria They then invaded China during China's civil war with Democratic Chiang Kai Shek against Mao and the communists. Japan first invaded Shanghai, then later Kai Shek's main city Nanking. After Japan's army slaughtered and raped 80,000 - 300,000 citizens, the US used the only diplomatic card it had left : the oil embargo. (What did Australia do to prevent Japan's Imperialist acts?). China was our friend and ally, Japan very isolationist.
"It was then, 20 years in the making, that Japan finally acted against the injustices that the US had perpetrated against them."
Injustices? bullshit. Japan wanted to be a Major Power, you said so yourself, just like a lot of European Governments did, and have colonies. And Japan also considered themselves a "Superior Race", and convinced their citizens that it was better for ASIANS to rule over other asians, to justify their invasions.
Then they attacked the US Navy base at Pearl Harbor to get us out of their way for a year or so, so they could entrench their control of a sea corridor to their invaded oil fields in Borneo Indonesia. (BTW, they had dispatched their Pearl Harbor attack fleet while still involved in negotiations with the US. Sneaky shit.).
"it was Russia that seized Berlin and ended the war in Europe. As for fixing 'the shit the Germans caused', why then did you lot wait until 1941 to start fixing 'the shit'? "
Our troops were told to pull back and let Russia invade first, so they would get the glory of that victory, and have some satisfaction / revenge for what they had suffered.
Why did the US wait until 1941? Because we were TRYING TO STAY OUT OF the WAR. The Pearl Harbor attack made us finally declare war because of that attatck, and when A few days later -because Japan had an alliance with Nazi Germany and Facist Italy- those countries declared War on the USA first, formally dragging us into the conflict.
"only the United States has used nuclear weapons on civilian population centres. As bad as communism is, at least they didn't do that."
The atomic bombs were dropped to bring a swift end to the Pacific war. After major terrible casualties at Okinawa and stupid little islands like Iwo Jima, it was evident that invading the Japan mainland would cost hundreds of thousands of lives. Civilian Tokyo women were given Spears and training to fight! Japan swore to fight to the last man!
It is easy to see how terrible atomic bombs are now, but remember that at the time the bombs were experimental. Theoretical blast. They had calculated a big bomb but they didn't really know how big or if it would even work. So there were two different bomb designs.
After the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima (a Military Target center of Army operations, not only "civilians"), Japan's military leaders surveyed the damage, and decided not to surrender.
The US then CONVENTIONALLY bombed Tokyo for THREE days, while still asking for surrender. Japan refused.
The second bomb was supposed to be dropped on the Navy yards at Yokohama, but it was too cloudy, so it was dropped on the Military target of the ship constructions at Nagasaki, which was also known for its manufacture of torpedos.
Only after that, at the urging of Japan's Emperor Hirohito did Japan surrender. (Incidentally, they say it was the first time that ordinary citizens ever heard his voice ).
Dropping the bombs was terrible, and we now know their terrible effects. ..We attacked Military Targets that had civilian populations. ... we didn't fly civilian aircraft full of innocent passengers into a skyscraper filled only with 5,000 civilians, or into their government capital.
Russia in Ukraine shot down a civilian passenger plane from Malaysian Airlines and never even offered an apology.
The Iraq war was declared by the United Nations, not the USA. I wish we didn't have to muck about in the Middle East. We do not want to be the World Police, it is too expensive! Costs too many lives. Too much bullshit.
TEAM AMERICA "WORLD POLICE
m.imdb.com/title/tt0372588/
I would rather travel to Afghanistan, or Iraq or Persia and look at the silk road monuments and old palaces, than shoot anybody. And mostly - hey, I gotta go to work and pay my bills and not have to give a crap about any of this.
The USA is Bankrupt! We are NOT the Richest Country in the World!! USA has been Bankrupt for 160 years!! Trillions of dollars in debt, and The Democrats TRIPLED that deficit under Obama. We cannot afford to be The Leader of the Free World, but it always seems like things will get much worse if we don't do SOMETHING.
I enjoyed reading your comments. I trust Jolly jack doesn't mind politics usurping his art.
As Paul Hogan's says : G'Day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Emm couple of moments, first: before marks was Parice commune.
secomd: Nazies destoyed 27 millions of people on occpited trritories of the Soviet Union, And near 6 millions jews and othet nations i europ,
mani peple was killed only for supporting communism. and that was done for 11 years. Reviolurion, civil war, take less people then nazi animals. Stalins repressions take only 674 thousends peole hwo was shot, add near 1,5 millons in prison labor camps (many was liberared befor apropriated tine even with labor awards) for 30 years. So statemant what communism (socialism) kill more people - is bullshit.''
Third: Sovierst could hande nazi army even with out lendlize (4% of all weaponry in soviet army) soviets keep nazi out fron moskow 4 moths already when shipments is started and thow avai nazi 4 monts later, besides moust of goods soviel solders called prety shity (exept figtres planes). when evaquated industry start working on full power land lise became needet only to sevice earlier geted goods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
First: That is true, and it did inspire part of Marx's writings, but the specific ideology known as Communism began with him.
Second: Well, he said Communism, not the Soviet Union's implementation of it. If you take Communist China/Vietnam/etc into consideration as well you get a much higher death tole. I can only imagine he was talking about Communism in it's entirety compared to National Socialism.
Third: In terms of military equipment, I have no doubt the USSR was keeping safe it's arms industry. But it was the production and supply of agricultural products, fuel, trucks and railway equipment that I'm talking about. www.rbth.com/business/2015/05/… www.historynet.com/did-russia-…
I can only speculate, I wasn't there sitting in on any Kremlin economic discussions in 1942, but it stands to reason that without the stream of supplies coming into Russia it would have been much more difficult to beat Germany. I'm not saying it would be impossible, but it would be slower and the casualties would have been higher.
Would you agree that it is *possible* that without the allies supplying enormous quantities of logistical equipment, the Red Army might not have had the ability to maneuver the number of men and equipment that it needed to complete the encirclement of Stalingrad or to the defence of Kursk? A victory for Germany at either would have at least extended the war for several more years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Capitalism take much more people other the world, it has 300 year for that. Peasants in Britan, hanged for vagancy, cild labour, irich slaves, african slaves, opium war in China. colonasation of mid east and south-east asia, genocide of people in Noth america. Even nazism is ugly bustard of capitalism, so don't bullshiting to me about victims of communism.
Not so musch, war could drag on maximun few moths, in worst сase. 4% of all supplices is not decisive factor, Soviet Union was at war 3 years and liberated most of their own lands when second front is opened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're conflating a broad number of things and calling it all Capitalism.
Britain was a feudal nation for thousands of years, so over which period of time are you passing judgement for there being "Peasants in Britan"?
"hanged for vagancy, cild labour, irich slaves, african slaves, opium war in China"
Sure, an unrestricted free market can have appalling results but Britain doesn't have these issues anymore and practices a mixed economy with government oversight. It was not necessary to revolt, to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat and to redistribute the means of production in order to get rid of these issues.
"colonasation of mid east and south-east asia, genocide of people in Noth america"
There were economic motivations behind colonisation but that wasn't the sole motivating factor. Nationalism, nation defence, power projection, prestige, etc... You can't ignore all that and just say 'It's all the fault of the gosh darn Capitalists'.
"Even nazism is ugly bustard of capitalism, so don't bullshiting to me about victims of communism."
First of all, the NSDAP has a centrally planned economy, far more like a Socialist system than a system that embraces Market Capitalism. Secondly, whilst Capitalism has brought more people out of poverty than any other ideology, Communism has killed more than any other ideology, so don't bullshiting to me about victims of Capitalism.
"Not so musch, war could drag on maximun few moths, in worst сase."
UN-FUCKING-LIKELY. If the Soviet encirclement of Stalingrad was a 'few months' late, the Germans could have taken the last Russian positions in the city, crossed the Volga and seized the oil fields in the Caucasus.
Even if the war still played out as it happened; if Russia was a 'few months' late in reinforcing Kursk, the Germans could have won the battle whilst maintaining their offensive capabilities. It wouldn't alter the outcome of the war but it would have lengthened it by more than a "maximun few moths, in worst сase".
"4% of all supplices is not decisive factor"
I don't think you're conceptualising 4% very well.
If there is a group of 100 people, does 96% of that group mean 100 people who each have 4% missing? No. It means 96 people.
That 4% does not mean 4% more tanks, 4% more uniforms, 4% more food, 4% more fuel, etc... That 4% (which is a figure given by the Soviet government and could well be deliberately understated for propaganda purposes) refers to specific parts of the Russian economy that, due to the consequences of the war or the preexisting state of the economy, could not be tailored towards necessary war production.
"second front is opened."
What is the war in North Africa?
What is the war in Italy?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hate England, huh?
You are posting in the comments section of an English artist... who seems to be anti-gun
Mature Content
(your freedom), anti-Trump (you glorious leeee-dur), and otherwise doesn't believe the US is the only free country in the world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
JollyJack's a great artist, but I think his political opinions are shit. =o
But hey, I guess the man's got as much right to express his opines as the rest of us. x3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I mean I do. I just try and say he should just stick to those damn furry Lewds instead of waving his snobby British ideals around.
Then again. He's the one getting the terrorist attacks. Not me. And it's his loss not having a gun to defend himself against them. Or if the monarchy or some other dictator rises to power.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You know, you'd figure with Putin doing his thing in the United States so much, I'm surprised he found time to go after another loose thread in Britian.
I guess he... "cares"...? :worried:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Brings a whole new meaning to 'Poison pen letters'... >.>
Oddly, British double-agents generally seem to be an exception of that newsreader's warning...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This substance can poison an entire contry !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
why doesn't Deviantart have a 'Like' feature for comments?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It does, but only the deviation submitter can 'feature' comments.
I vote for this one too, though. +1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Combine this with Trump sauce and you have yourself something that will kill you quicker than that stuff that makes your mouth bubble.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And finally add some Assan relish and Erdogan peppers to spice it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love russia's attitude towards their activities in the word: a smug 'prove it'. It almost invites retaliation and a return comment of 'prove it'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think updating the terror watch list might be more effective.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Effective yes. But not as amusing. What might also be kind of nice is monitoring Russia's activities a heck of a lot more and slamming a lot of doors on their fingers rather than a 'wait and see' approach. When a nation constantly makes itself your antagonist, you don't keep giving them chances. South Korea's 'Sunshine policy' has proven that much repeatedly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This commetn wasnt so funny if you don't write to siticen of country hwo out of EU with loud slam. Russia do not make it self antahinist, your goverments did it try to dictate their will. About SK acpecialy funny, first they isolated by "world community", not by him self, second even in isolation they can make nuklear shield to deffend they self, and thay can arrenge second vietnam to any one who try to attac.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm sorry.... 'Russia didn't make itself an antagonist'? Oh, right, we're just going to overlook the return to warsaw pact era attempts to annex free nations are we? No, I don't think so. New flash.... nobody wants Russia in their politics. Russia keeps sticking their foot in EVERYONE's politics. Usually with murder. Or did they invent the umbrella gun for self defense purposes and NOT assassination?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Where is difference of behavior of yours and your naighbour's goverments? Yours coutties akting same way but only Ruussia is bad, it is hippocracy. And your countries akting even worse, Russia at least do not bombing contries in stone age an do not ruin the states, Ukrane handle with it by US help (5 billions is officialy spent on maidan support), Georgia is still a state. becides georgia attacet first. Rest of your argument may ti maiirir on US and NATO, same politics methods, stop allready hippocrating.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Obviously you have little to no idea what country I'm from. Second point, Russia is the most aggressively smug of all nations, but it lags FAR behind China in terms of threats.... it's just more annoying for constantly being in EVERYONE'S faces ALL the time and then pretending it isn't. Third, your pretending Russia isn't trying to glory-grab itself back up to it's USSR days as if that will somehow make it a serious threat again in anything but political assassinations is hilariously outmoded.
You're operating off some assumption like I hate Russia. I don't. I'm ANNOYED by Russia. Russia is very much a nation dead in the water and seriously needs to clean itself up before doing ANYTHING else. I'm especially annoyed because I LIKE the Russian countryside and it's a damn shame it's attached to a nation that can't get it's head out of Putin's posterior.
By the way, there are a LOT of nations that are bad in this world. Russia's barely on the list, like an annoying kid brother to the much more dangerous ones. I consider Russia less of a world threat than North Korea right now, and given teh size and population differences, that's just sad considering the history of Russia. You know what's bad about Russia? Putin's Ego. that's pretty much it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Open your profile fool. I have idia where you from. Whos contry bombing libya in coalitoin wirh US, UK, And France? Dont bullsiting to me what your country acting any difference. For good what hapening on other sige of globe is not your f**ng buisness, acpecialy when it is matter of safery another coutry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Last I checked Canada wasn't doing anything the UN, which includes RUSSIA, wasn't agreeing is necessary, and we do it as peacekeepers. We don't go around assassinating people. ANd I like your 'not your F-ing business' idea... when are you Russians going to apply it to ANYTHING? Last I checked you clods are still assuming you have the right to rule parts of europe that clearly don't want you there.
And news flash, what happens on the other side of the world is EVERYONE'S business. The world is connected now, so you can't pretend you control the world's information with your silly Iron Curtain nonsense anymore. When something affects Canada or it's allies, we ARE going to react. Your rust-bucket country could certainly stand to remember that it's NOT the only nation in the world with interests outside it's borders. Last time I checked Canada has had a number of threats ushered at it from various muslim supremacy groups, which we are well within our rights to react to.
Not that you'll even listen, you knuckleheaded propaganda machine. Spew some more fatherland rhetoric. Heaven forbid you look at the world and see what everyone else does when you can be told what to think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Apparently the younger generation in Russia, some of them anyway, are growing wise to what Putin is doing to their people and how bad of an influence on their country and the world he is. They are the ones that he is most afraid of right now. Meanwhile, those among the older generation and those younger who listen to their state propaganda bullshit are quite content to have him running things into the ground in Russia. There's a reason why us "enlightened" westerners call Russia a "Mob" country my poor, deluded, brainwashed Russian friend and its because your precious Putin has turned your government into a state-sponsored criminal organization that specializes in bs propaganda, annexing free nations, and assassinating those it deems to be its enemies. Also, if you're gonna make an effort to argue with someone in English, try to check your spelling before you post, or don't, either way I will laugh at your nonsense.
Fact: I'm American and I didn't vote for Trump because that's my right and I live in a country where we don't have to be afraid of our leaders having us either imprisoned or assassinated for speaking out against them. Also, if I had a notebook where if I wrote someones name in it they would die, your boy Putin would be the first name, Trump would be the second. I am within my right to say that in my country because we have freedom of speech. Now Peasmman, crawl back into your hole and watch the state-sponsored propaganda news channel that you get all your info from, and remember to wipe your butt after shitting your pants from reading this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, if you listen to any Russian politician, or anyone listening to them, and that would be the majority - there are NO "growing wise" people in Russia, only "western pawns", "NATO agents", "foreign activists" and "little confused children warped by the evil internet"...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |