HOME | DD

Description
All-nighter, get!

This is pretty sloppy, I know. But I still like it, because:
1) It is for Storyboarding & Composition, and I took tons of productive shortcuts
2) It is of Pride and Prejudice, an excellent movie.

Edit: I don't like this anymore because:
1) It looks crappy
2) Textures don't match
3) You can see watermarks in the textures
4) It was trying to emulate a screenshot from a film. I used absolutely no imagination/artistic interpretation in this construction
5) All the above reasons, and yet it is popular because of the subject matter alone.
6) Painful composition—there's a reason this is a frame from a movie and not a study of a painting
7) remind me to never upload anything from a movie/game/book again

Criteria for this storyboard was to chose a movie representing any era between the beginning of time and the 1960s. This production board needed to include an animal in the shot.

textures from [link]

>>11.28.10 edit: If someone ever says in an image description that they are "pretty proud of something" or perhaps "really liked how it turned out", one can almost guarantee that the image sucks.

Description
All-nighter, get!

This is pretty sloppy, I know. But I still like it, because:
1) It is for Storyboarding & Composition, and I took tons of productive shortcuts
2) It is of Pride and Prejudice, an excellent movie.

Edit: I don't like this anymore because:
1) It looks crappy
2) Textures don't match
3) You can see watermarks in the textures
4) It was trying to emulate a screenshot from a film. I used absolutely no imagination/artistic interpretation in this construction
5) All the above reasons, and yet it is popular because of the subject matter alone.
6) Painful composition—there's a reason this is a frame from a movie and not a study of a painting
7) remind me to never upload anything from a movie/game/book again

Criteria for this storyboard was to chose a movie representing any era between the beginning of time and the 1960s. This production board needed to include an animal in the shot.

textures from [link]

>>11.28.10 edit: If someone ever says in an image description that they are "pretty proud of something" or perhaps "really liked how it turned out", one can almost guarantee that the image sucks.