HOME | DD

#tank #art #120mm #conceptart #game #weapon #wheeled #50caliber #googlesketchup #tankdestroyer #planethex
Published: 2015-01-20 00:49:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 123752; Favourites: 2216; Downloads: 2896
Redirect to original
Description
Workhorse, and a reliable one at that.Part of the series of concepts done for an unannounced turn-based strategy by Void Alpha.
3D model by powerpointranger: www.artstation.com/artwork/sco…
Related content
Comments: 55
mem7482836 [2023-04-03 06:59:58 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mem7482836 In reply to mem7482836 [2023-04-03 07:00:27 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SunGraphica [2022-08-08 15:33:35 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
darklord86 [2022-05-16 07:21:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
korAPUcard [2021-06-03 05:26:36 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Teebsy-86 [2019-09-06 20:08:03 +0000 UTC]
Not quite a truck, not quite a tank, not quite a boat - she goes anywhere and blows whatever she finds to shreds!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Randomguy2222 [2018-05-27 22:55:56 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a Stryker MGS with a bigger turret and gun.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Endy001 [2017-12-20 01:23:30 +0000 UTC]
Scorpion MGS. The Scorpion MGS was built to counter enemy armor while providing higher mobility. This is a eight wheeled tank destroyer designed to hit hard and move fast. It's capable of withstanding most infantry anti tank weapons, however advances in weapon innovation have generated the S1A1, with improved protection on the flanks from HEAT, and the S1A2 to better protect against kinetic penetrators.
But, that's just theoretical. *insert mat pat joke here*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
titanpaul51x [2017-09-16 16:40:09 +0000 UTC]
What are size dimension and weapon main gun? 125 MM or higher? Troops?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Endy001 In reply to titanpaul51x [2017-12-20 01:16:16 +0000 UTC]
Smaller than an Abrams, and lighter, crew of three or four perhaps?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kadavercianin [2017-04-23 21:49:54 +0000 UTC]
Хм.. Интересно, а это прямо утяжелённый страйкер)))
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
beatles17 [2016-08-02 20:02:32 +0000 UTC]
Is it just me or does this look like it can carry troops
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MikePrivalis In reply to malbien [2018-10-05 07:28:39 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking the same...I think the turret definitely borrows some aspects from the B1 Centauro's turret, not sure about the hull though, that might be more Stryker-ish...
It looks amazing though
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Samskiesctt [2015-09-20 16:24:13 +0000 UTC]
This IFV looks like it could be fielded today. Nice rendering, and details. It looks like it is base on the Striker or the Italian's Centauro. Which one is it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CharleyBlack [2015-02-06 23:09:50 +0000 UTC]
Классно, я тащусь от твоих машин. Даже не знаю как это может сделать человек, откуда столько фантазии и сколько времени ушло чтобы так научиться.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
davbla [2015-01-31 18:38:05 +0000 UTC]
rear wheels need to turn as well, or its going to have handling issues.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xxxRavenbladexxx [2015-01-24 23:37:47 +0000 UTC]
Wow, this is by far the most beautiful armored vehicle I've seen
Great work on that one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
megadolon013 [2015-01-23 19:42:45 +0000 UTC]
Tank hunter indeed. Reminds me of the centauro. Still ass kicker. Plus very cool looking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
deathmaster1319 In reply to john190 [2015-01-24 16:38:04 +0000 UTC]
can't help but be sad that there is no generals 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KaranaK In reply to Buhoy [2015-01-20 23:16:58 +0000 UTC]
Открой фотку страйкера, да сравни.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Buhoy In reply to KaranaK [2015-01-22 09:41:19 +0000 UTC]
Почти 1в1.
huntsmanblog.ru/wp-content/upl…
Только башню от Абрамса прицепили.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KaranaK In reply to Buhoy [2015-01-22 10:57:15 +0000 UTC]
Ну в этом случае, я бы на твоём месте обратился к врачу и проверил зрение, если тебе видится "почти 1в1". Серьёзно. Проверься.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Drock625 [2015-01-20 22:00:15 +0000 UTC]
This looks like a beautiful replacement for the Striker.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Matslong [2015-01-20 19:22:16 +0000 UTC]
There is a mistake on the left: "SECONDARY ARNAMENT"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BI00hazard [2015-01-20 17:19:56 +0000 UTC]
awesome job you should help kojima production with metal gear.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jerrykiddo [2015-01-20 15:29:53 +0000 UTC]
Why are there rear-view mirrors? Considering the only two ways to see outside this metal box is using the field optics camera and poking your head out the hatch, there is no reason for rear-view mirrors. Either choice for vision can be used for a 180 degree sweep of the landscape, there really is no need for rear-view mirrors.
Great design though, pretty mind boggling.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AntonMoscowsky [2015-01-20 09:16:32 +0000 UTC]
Это по прежнему сделано при помощи СкетчАпа? о_О Восхитительно!
Набашенный пулемет позицианируется как антивоздушный? Ибо по пехоте стрелять у него угол наклона вниз и далекое расположение будет явно мешать.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
precinctomega [2015-01-20 07:13:16 +0000 UTC]
It looks amazing, and I like the research you've clearly done on armour and anti-armour. So - out of sincere curiosity - why wheels? They seem like a counter-intuitive choice for a tactical asset as heavy as this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KaranaK In reply to precinctomega [2015-01-20 07:31:33 +0000 UTC]
Why are the wheels? Is the choice of the customer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
precinctomega In reply to KaranaK [2015-01-20 13:27:45 +0000 UTC]
No arguing with that, I guess. Just seems an odd design choice for a hybrid SPG/tank.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>