HOME | DD
Keitilen β We're Colorfully Blind
by-nc-nd
Published: 2010-10-26 19:58:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4139; Favourites: 77; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
This piece is dedicated to Pansexuals and in no way means they are better than everyone else. Nor does it say that other sexualities do not partake in "true love".Related content
Comments: 372
Who knows why. =_= I couldn't care less.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, but your deviation mentions love when sexuality is being discussed.
π: 0 β©: 1
The reason sexuality is being discussed is because these two (or three) kids have been picking apart my words, so the original discussion lead to another.
π: 0 β©: 1
It can get confusing after awhile, thank you for clarifying.
π: 0 β©: 1
No problem. It confuses me, too - don't know who has said what.
π: 0 β©: 1
It doesn't. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender.
π: 0 β©: 1
So why do people bring in love when it comes to set of genitals you want to have sex with?
π: 0 β©: 1
Because it's called making love?
π: 0 β©: 1
That's the romantic way of saying it, it's also called doing the nasty, fucking, having sex, making babies, as well as all other colorful phrases. Sexuality has nothing to do with love. It's all about what set of genitals you find yourself attracted to. Love has nothing to do with sex. You can be in love with the person you fuck but you don't have to be to fuck.
π: 0 β©: 3
Yes, it is the 'romantic way' of suggesting 'making love', but many feel that it is sharing 'something' between the two. There is nothing wrong with sexual intercourse (in general). Sexuality does have a connection to love, but not always. Some people can go their entire lifetime without ever 'making love'.
I do have to disagree with Medics with sexuality based on both being romantically and sexually being in love with someone. (Even if they all have the word "sex" within their titles.)
π: 0 β©: 1
-However pansexuality does not exist-.
π: 0 β©: 4
PANSEXUAL COULD BE MALE FEMALE AND INTERSEX MORON. GOOGLE GENDER DYSPHORIA IT APPLIES TO NONBINARIES TOOΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
GENDER VS SEX
"Sex = male and female; Gender = masculine and feminine"
[link]
"The terms sex, gender and sexual orientation are often used interchangeably. Despite sounding similar, they actually have three distinct meanings."
[link]
----------------------
PANSEXUALITY
"Pansexual people are people attracted to people without considering their gender. The word pansexual comes from the Greek word 'pan-', meaning 'all'. Pansexual people are part of the LGBT community."
"Pansexuality is different from bisexuality. Bisexual people are attracted to both men and women, but pansexual people are attracted to any people. This includes people who are neither male nor female. Pansexuality is the opposite asexuality, as pansexuality means a person may be sexually attracted to anyone, but asexuality means a person is sexually attracted to no one."
[link]
"A form of sexuality often confused or intermeshed in definition with bisexualaty (an attraction towards both physical sexes: male and female). Pansexuality is, in truth, a much broader form of sexual orientation, in which the pansexual individual experiences sexual attraction towards members of ALL genders (not to be confused with sexes, which is purely physical--gender has to do with the psychological), including transgender, transsexual, cross dressing, androgyne, androgen, two-spirited, gender-fliud, and all other variety of gender identitfications, as well as those who do not feel that they have a gender."
[link]
----------------------
A little laugh for some:
Pansexuality:
"People who have sexual relationships with kitchenware."
[link]
----------------------
So, Medics, you were right on the "gender" versus "sex" definition. One of the quotes above do say that they are usually 'interchangeable'. Switching around "gender" and "sex" in my side of the disagreement (wherever necessary), I have been correct.
π: 0 β©: 2
Thank you for proving my point in what gender and sex are. Like I have been saying gender and sex are not the same.
Sexualities are based on sex.
Any one of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender.
Anyone who doesn't think so, is a bigot pansexual.
π: 0 β©: 1
It is what other gender you allow yourself to love that determines sexuality. (:
π: 0 β©: 1
No it's not. Only biological sex. Sexualities are based on sex, not gender.
π: 0 β©: 1
Typed the wrong word, sorry. (Kind of running on 4 hours sleep in the past 48 hours.)
π: 0 β©: 1
(That's great so am I ^______________^)
π: 0 β©: 1
"The difference between Pansexuality and Bisexuality is that bisexuals are attracted to their own sex and the opposite sex. Pansexuals do not care about gender. Ill take a term 'Gender blind' I think it's the best term I have learned to have people understand. The thing, gender doesn't matter to me."
π: 0 β©: 2
Bisexuals don't care about gender either. :3c [link]
"Bisexuality means sexual or romantic attraction or behavior directed towards some members of more than one sex."
It does not state male/female. Just "more than one".
π: 0 β©: 0
No, just adding onto the previous post, as I did the last time you mentioned it. It just looks better to me that way.
π: 0 β©: 0
Pansexuality is a sexuality. If you don't believe it is, go find the person who came up with the category.
π: 0 β©: 1
The word exists, the sexuality? Nope. It's just bisexuality. A word that already had been in existence.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pansexuality is thought of as a branch off of bisexuality. There are many words that have existed - and many sexualities have branched off of them. Do you debate on those, too?
π: 0 β©: 1
It's not a branch off of. It's the same thing.
The other sexualities gained a named because they exist. Pansexuality, however, is just bisexuality.
π: 0 β©: 0
I completely agree with you on that.
π: 0 β©: 0
A sexuality is based on who you are romantically and sexually attracted to. So yes, love comes into play when discussing your sexual orientation. Romantic love, not platonic/familial.
So yes, sexuality does have to do with love.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well homo/bi/and hetero sexuality is based on being sexually attracted of a certain gender. Being sexually attracted has nothing to do with romance. Again, that's how I've seen them defined.
π: 0 β©: 2
I agree with you here. I think I mentioned this somehow in my last reply.
π: 0 β©: 0
No it's not based on gender. Sexuality is based on biological sex, not gender. And sexuality does have to do with romantic/emotional attraction *and* sexual attraction. This is going by how Wikipedia even defines it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Gender is sex, at least that's the last time I checked the dictionary. And again, in things such as homosexuality are defined as those who have a sexual attraction to the same sex. And sexual attraction being defined as attractiveness based on sexual desire, which is not always romantic.
π: 0 β©: 1
Biological sex: In biology, sex is a process of combining and mixing genetic traits, often resulting in the specialization of organisms into a male or female variety (known as a sex).
Gender: Gender is a set of characteristics that are seen to distinguish between male and female. Depending on the context, the discriminating characteristics vary from sex to social role to gender identity.
They are not the same. Gender CAN be synonymous with sex, but sex is NOT synonymous with gender. And when pansexuals mention gender, they mean the traits.
Homosexuality: Homosexuality is romantic and/or sexual attraction or behavior among members of the same sex or gender.
These definitions are all the ones from Wikipedia.
π: 0 β©: 1
I get you use Wikipedia the first time you said it. I use a dictionary for my definitions. You can repeat what you want Ad nauseam as much as you like, I still said I am using the definitions found in the dictionary for this.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're denying that these are the definitions, however. Also reply all you want, I will correct you.
Here I got these from dictionary websites:
heterosexual - A person who prefers to have sexual and emotional relationship with members of the opposite gender.
heterosexual - Individuals who are sexually and/or emotionally attracted towards persons of another gender.
is a sexual orientation characterized by esthetic attraction, romantic love or sexual desire exclusively for members of the opposite sex or gender, contrasted with homosexuality and distinguished from bisexuality and asexuality.
Romantic love sure likes to pop up there a lot.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not denying that they are definitions. As I have said, repeatedly, they are not the ones I was using. I don't know how many times I have to repeat that for you understand.
Also:
Homosexuality: (of a person) sexually attracted to people of one's own sex
I'm sorry but I'm afraid I'm going to trust Oxford over you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes me citing several dictionaries and Wikipedia is totally untrustworthy. Regardless I'm still right.
π: 0 β©: 1
So you're saying Oxford is wrong?
π: 0 β©: 1
There is more than one recognized dictionary. If 9/10 of the definitions I checked mention romantic love, I'm gonna go by that. Plus Wikipedia..
π: 0 β©: 1
That didn't answer my question
π: 0 β©: 1
It answers it. It means I'll go by the 90% majority over your 10%.
π: 0 β©: 1
So you're saying Oxford is wrong?
π: 0 β©: 1
I never said it's wrong, but all the definitions are official definitions. Majority outweighs minority. It certainly has ONE of the definitions of that, but the entirety. Oxford's website, however, is not nearly as extensive as the others I've used.
π: 0 β©: 1
I asked if you said it was wrong and you kept saying you weren't going to believe them. I'd say you're saying they're wrong. Again, I'm following their definition. I don't see why you feel the need to shove other ones down my throat when all I have ever said is I'm going by that definition.
π: 0 β©: 1
I said I believe the majority of the minority. They certainly have part of the definition but not all of it. ^^
I think you should learn to follow majority as well when it comes to the definition. ^_^
π: 0 β©: 1
So if the majority says that gays and lesbians should be all killed, I guess that's okay because they're the majority! YAY!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>