HOME | DD
Keitilen โ We're Colorfully Blind
by-nc-nd
Published: 2010-10-26 19:58:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4139; Favourites: 77; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
This piece is dedicated to Pansexuals and in no way means they are better than everyone else. Nor does it say that other sexualities do not partake in "true love".Related content
Comments: 372
"I think you should learn to follow majority as well when it comes to the definition. ^_^"
Not follow them in morals. You should probably learn to read too, XDD;.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
"I think you should learn to follow majority as well when it comes to the definition. ^_^"
You should learn to speak English. And it's nice that you want to say that Oxford is wrong and that people are wrong for using that definition when there are other people who say otherwise. You know, that's fine that's your opinion on the matter but the fact that you say someone's wrong for using a valid definition is rather ignorant.
You want to say there's romance involved, fine but I don't think so. Though you'll probably say I'm wrong anyway.
TL;DR You can't be mature about this and want to be right so have fun with that.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
You should learn to read a sentence. You don't read "parts" of it but not the whole. That means out of what you said all you said was "And it's".
You can't be mature when I provide a definition. Hmmm.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
"You don't read 'parts' of it but not the whole." (Medics)
If you don't read parts of a sentence, or the whole of it - then are you not supposed to read it at all?
"You can't be mature about this and want to be right so have fun with that." (Namshiel)
There is a difference between being mature and actually listening to the opinion of others, then shoving your own beliefs down another person's throat.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
You do read the whole I made a typo, thank you! 
Why are you quoting Namshiel? I am not them. This won't appear in their inbox ever. Only mine. You cat like you just joined deviantART XD
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I know you made a typo, but that was just doing what you have been doing to me. Accept I'm not adding words or taking them away from what you originally said. But I guess you like continuing to think higher of yourself by calling other people names. Shows how mature you truly are.
No, I was quoting Namshiel just for you. You act like you have the worst case of Autism.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
So? I was glad you pointed out the typo then said what I really meant.
*Except. Not accept. I am not adding or taking from anything you have said either. Which is why you get so mad.
You were talking to someone else. Like you have been half of this time. And really? You're the one who can't defend themselves....which is what autisics do. x3
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I told you why some of us post off of our last - because it looks better. But again, you must go on repeating yourself.
That is false, because I haven't met anyone with Autism that hasn't put up a good argument. And that is definitely not what Autism is about. Also, I have been defending myself quite clearly - you repeat the same things over-and-over again.
Where do you get when you continue to walk in circles?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
It doesn't look better, it looks confusing. If you're going to talk to me, talk to me so it shows up in my inbox. But if you are talking to anyone BUT me? Do NOT send it to me. They won't see it and it will be invalid in an argument against me.
Any autistic I've met on this site acts like a 5 year old who just learned to type.
"Where do you get when you continue to walk in circles?" - Around the World.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
PS: The pansexual symbol looks like the Pokemon Dollar symbol.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
That is the official symbol. If you have a problem with it, well, that is indeed your own issue.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
I'm just pointing it out.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
He just made an observation.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
-Squints.-
Kind of resembles the letter รพ.
Note to self: stay away from pans on Halloween.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
I'm genderblind, but I'm a lesbian. Because everyone is "gender blind" when they are in love. Idiots.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Wait - if you are a Lesbian, how can you be "genderblind" if you are only attracted to woman?
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Also you act like it's a bad thing to enjoy someone's outer appearance? When a person loves someone they love their personality, their looks, their interests, their soul, everything. Need I go on?
Pansexuals argue they love mind not body. But isn't that JUST as insulting as loving someone's body and not their mind? I'd sure feel self conscious around a pan who was like that!
Sexualities are not about lusting over a person's looks. It just means whether you're gay/straight/bi that you know what you are romantically inclined to be attracted to. I am not liking women specifically "just for looks". It's entirely about how I feel with them. I think guys are attractive too, but I'm no bisexual because when I'm close with men it just doesn't feel romantic at all. It feels like they're my brother. And I'm not incestuous. :U
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I wouldn't say it's a bad thing, I just couldn't love someone because of their appearance. That belief came about when I was asked years ago 'what life would be like if you were blind'. If you are blind, how do you love someone's appearance? Thus, what "gender blind" was referring to ultimately.
Yes, Pansexuals do argue that we love mind and not body. Loving someone's body and not mind is very different from the opposite - it's like going to a strip club and watching a "hot" girl/guy strip and spin around poles. So, no, mind over body and body over mind are very different.
I never used the word lust either. =_=; Nor did I say the other sexualisms were only based on lust. Again, you are stretching words.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
That is a bad thing. It's a huge self esteem blow to say you don't love someone's appearance but you love the ~rest~ of them. Especially to women. If you're blind you can still love someone's appearance. Love the way they feel vs. how someone else feels.
You should love the mind AND body like the rest of humanity does.
Going to a strip club is /not/ going there to date the girl. You watch her then leave. It has NOTHING to do with romance at all! Mind over body is NO different than body over mind. They're both degrading and insulting. Body /and/ mind, please.
I'm not stretching words, if what you said is all the other sexualities love body over mind, they're just lusting. You even bring up an "example" of a guy at a strip club and yet...that's not romance at all. He's not courting her. He has no intention of it. It has NOTHING to do with love in the least!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Again, if you base your relationship on both mind and body - there is nothing really wrong with that. But I could not. I would rather date a person who was "not attractive" at all and the most wonderful person in the world (in my opinion) than a person who is the "best looking" and a complete jerk. (Also, I am not saying there is not an "in-between" the two examples.)
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
All love is based on mind and body.
Just mind or just body is lust. Sorry pans...you lust.
You do realize when you LOVE someone they're not "not attractive". Instead you find them the most gorgeous thing ever.
You're really blind. You can see people as unattractive. That's disgusting. How could you be with someone and ADMIT they're not attractive? That's so rude.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
They were just examples for you since you depend on both "personality and body". I find that disgusting to rely on them both.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
I don't rely on anything. If you love someone you should automatically enjoy everything about them. If you don't? Then you just lust after one thing ab out them. And I find that disgusting.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
No matter what someone looks like, everyone is beautiful in their own way. Pansexuality skips "looking" and concentrates on the person inside.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Everyone who is a fucking kind person knows that everyone is beautiful in their own way. It has NOTHING to do with sexuality. I think men are very attractive. But I'm not attracted TO them. I don't think they're "ugly" because I'm gay. Like, wow. What a dipshit opinion that would be. Pansexuality skips looking because they deep down don't think the person is beautiful in their own way and think they're ugly. Otherwise they'd flat out admit the person was beautiful. All the other sexualities don't have a problem admitting that they find the person they are with attractive. Even if nobody else would think they were love blinds a person. But apparently we need a whole new sexuality for a completely normal human emotion.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Again, your thought process is retarded as that is not what we think at all. And I never said we did not say the person is beautiful, we just overlook appearance and consider personality first and then can see beauty on the outside.
OXFORD:
pansexual(pan-sex-u-al)
adjective
> not limited or inhibited in sexual choice with regard to gender or activity
noun
> a person who is sexually inclusive in this way
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
That sounds like bisexuality to me!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
"A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females. Pansexuals are 'gender-blind', it doesn't really matter if their partner is male, female, mtf, ftm, or whatever else. I like to think of it as being attracted to the soul, and not to the body..."
"Bisexual and pan sexual are sometimes used in the same context. Some of the bisexual individuals even identify themselves as pansexual. It can be a little difficult to identify static difference between the two but still they have their own different identities.... Bisexual implies the presence of only two sets of genders. Whereas pansexual implies that there are more genders. This is one of the basic differences that one can notice between the two.... Bisexual is just an attraction of the sex and there is no need that sex should happen between the two bisexual individuals. It is just attraction and not action. Bisexual individuals are attracted to their sexes and the opposite sex. On the other hand, pansexual love, which can be termed as a sexual orientation characterised by eternal love or romantic love...."
[link]
Summary:
1.Bisexual implies the presence of only two sets of genders. Whereas pansexual implies that there are more genders.
2.While pansexual individuals are attracted to men, women, transgender, transsexual and intersex individuals, bisexual individuals are only attracted to their same sex or the opposite sex.
3.Pansexual individuals do not care for genders but only cares for personality. Whereas, bisexuals are more attracted to the gender and relationships.
4.Bisexuals most often have the pressure to choose between gay and straight. They identify themselves as homosexuals or heterosexuals. Pansexual individuals, on the other hand do have such orientation. They skip the binaries and are outside such purviews.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I replied to this already.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I know you did, but it obviously takes repetition in order for anything to get through to you - even in the smallest way possible.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I replied to this already.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Well, at least I didn't have to repeat it again.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I replied to this already.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
She means that when you're in LOVE with someone, you find the body attractive as well as the mind, even if you thought they were the ugliest thing ever at first.
Finding the body attractive isn't always about 'omg hot I want to fuck the hell out of you', but if you find the mind attractive first, then you WILL find the body attractive in this sort of way 'I love you for you, and you are beautiful in every way, I love every portion of you'
That is that people who find the body attractive second, don't GIVE a shit on what it looks like. That is, they will find their body beautiful no matter if they are skinny one day, gained 200 pounds the next day, their hair fell out, etc, that person will still always be both physically and emotionally beautiful to you if you truely LOVED them.
THAT is what I am guessing, that she is trying to tell you :/
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I agree with you completely - your explanation was a lot more understandable. Was this to me or the other girl?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Because I don't believe in gender roles. Doesn't change the fact I'm only romantically attracted to women.
I'm in love with my girlfriend. It doesn't matter that I know my sexuality. I'm in /love/ with her. Pansexuals forget that everyone loves regardless of gender. If you DO lust over a SPECIFIC gender then it's a paraphilia, not a sexuality.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I don't believe in gender roles either.
Gender is part of physical appearance. AND, before someone says it, that does not mean everyone goes into public and 'flashes' one another.
I am happy you have found your girlfriend and hope you will always be happy.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Exactly and humans only have two genders. Male and female.
This has nothing to do with how one cuts their hair or dresses. These aren't how the species is. How we are naked is our gender. The white-throated swallow has two female genders and two male genders. Because they have a white-tipped male and female version and a tan-tipped male and female version.
We do not have any types. Just two sexes and intersex.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
I guess you can be "gender blind" when Lesbian or Gay - but being pansexual means you don't consider gender at all. It's the personality that counts.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
Stop saying lesbian and gay. We're all the same, we're gay. We're homosexuals.
I DON'T consider gender at all. Because gender is not the same as biological sex. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Well, at least you got that "lesbian" and "gay" were both "homosexual". (Last time I had to argue with someone about there being a supposed 'big difference' between the two.)
Yes, they have the right to love whomever they want, but their sexuality addresses that they are only attracted to a specific gender.
PANSEXUALITY is different from BISEXUALITY because of quite a few reasons, the biggest being:
- Pansexuals are monogamous.
- Pansexuals are truly "gender blind" because they do not consider gender/sex when in their relationship.
---------------------------------
Lesbian: Female/Female
"Gay" (Male Homosexual): Male/Male
Bisexual: Male/Male or Female, Female/Male or Female
Pansexual: Homosapien/Homosapien
---------------------------------
Reproductive Organs:
Male: Penis
Female: Vagina
๐: 0 โฉ: 6
HAVING A PENIS AND XX OR VAGINA XY IS INTERSEX. ALSO TRANS PPL DONT ALWAYS HAVE THOSE
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Most bisexuals, homosexuals and heterosexuals are monogamous as well. :\
And if they aren't, it has nothing to do with sexuality.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Most. The point of being Pansexual is that they are all monogamous. And being monogamous has very little to do with sexuality, and yet it is still part of the definition of Pansexuality.
๐: 0 โฉ: 3
That doesn't even make sense.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Nor is it in the definition of any OTHER sexuality.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>