HOME | DD
Keitilen — We're Colorfully Blind
by-nc-nd
Published: 2010-10-26 19:58:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4187; Favourites: 77; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
This piece is dedicated to Pansexuals and in no way means they are better than everyone else. Nor does it say that other sexualities do not partake in "true love".Related content
Comments: 373
I don't recall directly telling you not to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're very hell bent on being retarded about a comment I left a homophobe. Doesn't put you in a good light!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are very bent on trying to stir trouble with me about every word I say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're very bent on replying to everything. And I wasn't "stirring up trouble". I was merely saying it puts you in a bad light when you shoot someone down for defending homosexuals against a homophobe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe you weren't trying to, but you have been doing it quite a bit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again, think whatever you want. Go find someone else defending Pansexuality to aggravate and waste their time, Ms./Mr. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And yet I was talking to a homophobe so it wasn't even about pansexuality. XDDD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The quote of "love is blind" does not legitimately mean all who experience it are blind. Nor does it mean we will accidentally touch personal areas on a person. Is what your saying referring to people who are in love are perverted? Or does it refer to the blind being perverts?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am saying that using the excuse 'love is blind' to justify engaging in perverse behavior (homosexuality) is folly at best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You should be aromantic asexual then. Problem solved.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No one is a pervert because of their sexuality or choices - with exception of the typical suggestions of rapists, pedophiles, and so on, which does not have to do (at all) with people who simply love the people of the same gender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sexual perversion is just that - homosexuality, bisexuality, transgender, pan, bestialty, necrosexuality, pedosexuality, incest, all
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Transgenderism isn't a sexuality. It's apart of gender identity.
Necrosexuality is not a sexuality. Sexuality is based on biological sex. You mean necrophilia which is a paraphilia. Same with pedophilia.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, tell that to the people who created GLBT.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Uh...tell them about paraphilias? Yeah, that's probably why they don't include those in the title!
They include transgenders but the title isn't about sexualities. It's about 2 sexualities and a gender identity. Even though I believe the title should just be GB. Gay/bi. And that transgenders should not be in it because it assumes they are gay or bi when usually they're straight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So, that is what you are complaining about - the "title".
Some titles are random and have nothing to do with the work, but it seems to fit perfectly.
"Even though I believe the title should just be GB. Gay/bi." If you BELIEVE that, then that is YOUR opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not complaining about the title in my previous statement to you. I was talkinga bout the GLBT title. Not the title of your piece. Are you even properly reading these comments...? Do you know how to look at a thread of them?
LOL why are you mad at me for saying I believe something?? I am aware it's my opinion. Doesn't change the FACT that sexualities have nothing to do with gender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Who says I'm angry? I like debating. (: I have many friends who don't believe in anything I do and yet they stand up for me. Might be confusing, but that's how it is.
And you were speaking of the title, therefore I spoke of the title right back.
I have been on this website probably longer than you and am sometimes called a "grammar Nazi". I am reading these comments very well, thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not a debate. I just know what gender and sex are, and you don't. 
I was speaking of the title in ANOTHER comment thread, idiot. SO it was irrelevant.
I am a grammar nazi. You, however, are having a hard time grasping the comment-system. And I doubt you've been here longer. I've been here 6 years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Did you want to go with "argument" or "disagreement" instead?
I've been here 5 - shown on my page.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'll go with "you have no idea what you're talking about now so you bring up an irrelevant question".
My page doesn't show how long because I've had about 6 accounts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That was my guess, actually. And it doesn't even matter, regardless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well you said you were here longer sooo...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you believe that, it is your business.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Indeed, and speaking aginst those behaviors is also.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, that is the way you feel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, it's good you have your opinions, it shows you can think for yourself. Many cannot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
someone who likes ALL genders
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pansexuality is just bisexuality.
ANYONE can "love for love". Anyone of ANY sexuality can love anyone of ANY gender.
Sexuality is based on biological sex, not gender. Gender and sex are two different things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FYI bisexuals are not into threesomes. Anyone of any sexuality can be monogamous...this person is a bisexual-hater and treats them like sluts. -_____-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
as you had said before, i am entirely confused in this conversation about threesomes... but i appreciate your definitions and helping of my new understanding of the word
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bisexuals are not into threesomes by sexuality. That is a personal choice. Anyone of any sexuality can have a threesome. Sorry I just felt I had to tell you that, because this person talking about pansexuals thinks bisexuality means you want a threesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kk, you both have really helped though <3<3<3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol - Hopefully we have. And hopefully we haven't confused you in this disagreement. Believe whatever you wish, hun, and don't ever let anyone else tell you your wrong with what you believe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Medics:
Pansexuality is a subcategory for Bisexuality. Bisexuality is known to most because if you ask many, they immediately think, "ooh, I can get a threesome". Pansexuality means you do not think of appearance, gender, and so on. It is also monogamous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have no idea how to reply do you? You just told this to s165455, not me. I went to the deviation and thankfully saw it, but in actuality this message you sent appeared ONLY in her inbox...So she's gonna be pretty damn confused.
Bisexuals DO NOT want THREESOMES. THAT is a stereotype and YOU are disgusting for stating it. Bisexuals are NOT polyamorous. That is /ALSO/ disgusting to state. I am so fucking offended.
Gender has NOTHING to do with sexuality. I'm a lesbian. A girl's gender can be butch/femme/androgyne/whatever. It doesn't change my chances of liking her. :U
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I never said ALL bisexuals were into threesomes. And I do find it quite disgusting, which is why I found "Pansexualism" which fit me better. Especially after being asked OVER and OVER again if I would partake in a threesome by people I dated. And, yes, it is a stereo type for ALL bisexuals when only SOME partake in it.
And I posted it under her so she would get it and not get confused. So why don't you look from someone else's perspective?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You already told me bisexuals are not monogamous. Which is completely untrue. Polysexuals and polyamorous people are into multiple relationships, NOT bisexuals. I hate bisexuals who just use the term pansexual to run away from negative stereotypes. Straight and gay people have negative stereotypes too, and we educate people so they can actually take us seriously. We don't make up a NEW sexuality.
I'm GAY. People ask ME if I want to have a 2 girl/1 guy threesome. Those questions are not ONLY for bisexuals. It didn't make me run away to be a pan.
She isn't confused. I corrected her on your definition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Some of us don't run away from stereotypes - "pansexuality" is just a better word that fits.
I haven't addressed that a threesome was "ONLY for bisexuals".
Yes, we do educate those who misunderstand homosexuality and such.
She was probably confused as you changed the definition around. I believe your definition is false.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You did run from a stereotype. Bisexuality fits it perfectly. It's scientific. Your sexuality more refers to fucking animals.
I never told you that you said a threesome was only for bisexuals.
Then educate them about bisexuality, which you are doing the opposite of.
I didn't change the definition around at all. She was very nice to me. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bisexuality and Pansexuality are different in a few ways. I posted quotations from dictionaries earlier. Bisexuality is not pansexuality.
No, I don't think you did - I think it was the other kid.
Why educate on bisexuality when this is based on pansexuality? And just because I am pansexual doesn't mean I cannot educate on bisexuality, homosexuality, and whatever else.
No, maybe it isn't false to you. But, to me, it is. Therefore, these are both opinions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>