HOME | DD
Keitilen β We're Colorfully Blind
by-nc-nd
Published: 2010-10-26 19:58:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4139; Favourites: 77; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
This piece is dedicated to Pansexuals and in no way means they are better than everyone else. Nor does it say that other sexualities do not partake in "true love".Related content
Comments: 372
There is a definition I have read before that states monogamy is one of the parts of being pansexuality. I was trying to find it before work earlier.
I have friends who are married to multiple people. Never said it was wrong - just people adding and stretching my words.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's completely ridiculous. Monogamy happens in all sexualities, to include it in the definition of one in particular is lidicrous. So unless I don't see it from a dictionary-- not a pan website, those are biased-- I will not believe it :/
And no one twisted your words, this is exactly what you said:
"PANSEXUALITY is different from BISEXUALITY because of quite a few reasons, the biggest being:
- Pansexuals are monogamous.
- Pansexuals are truly "gender blind" because they do not consider gender/sex when in their relationship."
If you say they are different because of those two reason then according to your own words, pansexuals are different from bis, because unlike bis, pans are monogamous. DIFFERENT immediately implies one is without the other and bis are not monogamous like you. Tell me how exactly anyone twisted your words, you specifically said bis were different because pans are monogamous
π: 0 β©: 1
If you have a problem with what dictionaries say, then contact the writers. Just because I copied and posted them, does not mean that I wrote them originally.
If that is what you think.
π: 0 β©: 2
panΒ·sexΒ·uΒ·al
β β/pΓ¦nΛsΙkΚuΙl/ Show Spelled[pan-sek-shoo-uhl] Show IPA
βadjective
1.
Psychiatry . pertaining to the theory that all human behavior is based on sexuality.
2.
Also, omnisexual. expressing or involving sexuality in many different forms or with a variety of sexual outlets.
[link]
None of the definitions you have said are this one. And this is from fucking dictionary.com.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you go to different dictionaries on the internet, or take the quotes I posted and copy them to Google, you will find them.
And, just to let you know, swearing - especially to someone you don't know - just shows you need another lesson in manners.
π: 0 β©: 1
I have gone to others. 
pansexual
βΆadjective not limited or inhibited in sexual choice with regard to gender or activity. βΆnoun a pansexual person.
β derivatives
pansexuality noun.
(which we have discussed doesn't make sense since everyone loves regardless of gender. and if they mean "sex" then they are bisexual)
panΒ·sexΒ·uΒ·al (pn-sksh-l)
adj.
Relating to, having, or open to sexual activity of many kinds.
n.
A pansexual person.
(this one says nothing you stated. just that they're open!)
π: 0 β©: 1
OXFORD:
pansexual(pan-sex-u-al)
adjective
> not limited or inhibited in sexual choice with regard to gender or activity
noun
> a person who is sexually inclusive in this way
π: 0 β©: 1
"A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females. Pansexuals are 'gender-blind', it doesn't really matter if their partner is male, female, mtf, ftm, or whatever else. I like to think of it as being attracted to the soul, and not to the body..."
"Bisexual and pan sexual are sometimes used in the same context. Some of the bisexual individuals even identify themselves as pansexual. It can be a little difficult to identify static difference between the two but still they have their own different identities.... Bisexual implies the presence of only two sets of genders. Whereas pansexual implies that there are more genders. This is one of the basic differences that one can notice between the two.... Bisexual is just an attraction of the sex and there is no need that sex should happen between the two bisexual individuals. It is just attraction and not action. Bisexual individuals are attracted to their sexes and the opposite sex. On the other hand, pansexual love, which can be termed as a sexual orientation characterised by eternal love or romantic love...."
[link]
Summary:
1.Bisexual implies the presence of only two sets of genders. Whereas pansexual implies that there are more genders.
2.While pansexual individuals are attracted to men, women, transgender, transsexual and intersex individuals, bisexual individuals are only attracted to their same sex or the opposite sex.
3.Pansexual individuals do not care for genders but only cares for personality. Whereas, bisexuals are more attracted to the gender and relationships.
4.Bisexuals most often have the pressure to choose between gay and straight. They identify themselves as homosexuals or heterosexuals. Pansexual individuals, on the other hand do have such orientation. They skip the binaries and are outside such purviews.
π: 0 β©: 1
There only are male and females. Intersex people are male AND female.
Sexualities are based on sex, not gender. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender.
Unless you are advocating that pansexuals can fuck animals? In which case that's animal abuse. =/
1. Bisexuality implies NOTHING about gender at all! Sexuality is not based on gender. It is based on biological sex. Bisexual websites even list bisexuality as "Bisexuality means sexual or romantic attraction or behavior directed towards some members of more than one sex." <-- More than one. That's all. [link]
2. Transgendered and transsexual people are NOT their OWN gender. They are the sex they want to or have become! You're degrading them by considering them something else. Intersex people are under what a bisexual would be attracted to. And, other sexualities can love them as well. You degrade them by saying only a pansexual can love them. Bisexuals are indifferent to sex entirely.
3. Sexuality is not based on genders. It is based on biological sex. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender. And bisexuals are not attracted more to the sex than a relationship. That just has to do with their sexual attraction, not their romantic lives. You're degrading bisexuals by implying they only seek for lust.
4. Bisexuals have that pressure, yes. Just like gays have the pressure to just be straight, and some straights are pressured to be bisexual or gay. Your sentence makes no sense however when you say "Pansexual individuals on the other hand do have such orientation". Yeah, they're bisexual. What about it?
π: 0 β©: 1
Also, I left the quotes off of numbers 1 through 4 just to see what you would say. Those were also quotes from the article.
π: 0 β©: 1
"Also, I left the quotes off of numbers 1 through 4 just to see what you would say. Those were also quotes from the article."
Here's what I would say:
There only are male and females. Intersex people are male AND female.
Sexualities are based on sex, not gender. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender.
Unless you are advocating that pansexuals can fuck animals? In which case that's animal abuse. =/
1. Bisexuality implies NOTHING about gender at all! Sexuality is not based on gender. It is based on biological sex. Bisexual websites even list bisexuality as "Bisexuality means sexual or romantic attraction or behavior directed towards some members of more than one sex." <-- More than one. That's all. [link]
2. Transgendered and transsexual people are NOT their OWN gender. They are the sex they want to or have become! You're degrading them by considering them something else. Intersex people are under what a bisexual would be attracted to. And, other sexualities can love them as well. You degrade them by saying only a pansexual can love them. Bisexuals are indifferent to sex entirely.
3. Sexuality is not based on genders. It is based on biological sex. Anyone of any sexuality can love anyone of any gender. And bisexuals are not attracted more to the sex than a relationship. That just has to do with their sexual attraction, not their romantic lives. You're degrading bisexuals by implying they only seek for lust.
4. Bisexuals have that pressure, yes. Just like gays have the pressure to just be straight, and some straights are pressured to be bisexual or gay. Your sentence makes no sense however when you say "Pansexual individuals on the other hand do have such orientation". Yeah, they're bisexual. What about it?
π: 0 β©: 0
You did not post the definition of pansexual as exclusively monogamous, as far as I could see :/ What I have a problem with is you saying that's what the dictionary says when it is not. You are ignoring the issue on hand, which is your direct implication that bis and pans are different because pans are monogamous, meaning bis cannot be monogamous since "different" implies otherwise.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, and in another reply to whomever, I also said I had seen a definition with that included - I just had to find it. I think it was in one of my college books, so I'll have to dig them out.
No one is ignoring anything - everything I have said ends up being understood as something else, therefore "stretched around". I am not going to continue circling around and around things that have already been said.
π: 0 β©: 1
You told that to me. I insist I want to actually see it because otherwise I don't believe it exists.
And you are ignoring it because you never told me or anyone how everyone stretched anything, your exact words were "pans are different because they're monogamous." There is no other possible way to interpret that than "bis are not monogamous." Just admit you might have phrased that poorly and I'll be out of here; you don't want to face that you're the one that came out sounding wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, I'm done wasting my time arguing with people. And the reason I never decided to quote the 'stretching of words' is because I do not feel like digging through numerous pages when you could certainly do it yourself.
Oh, and to clarify 'doing it yourself' before anything is said - I am not demanding you to do it.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're supposed to be quoting pansexuality, not "stretching of words".
π: 0 β©: 1
Wasn't it just you who said 'you are ignoring it because you never provided proof of people stretching your words'?
And I've run out of ambition to research anymore because there is obviously no point. No matter what is said, I hold to my belief and you keep yours.
π: 0 β©: 1
No. It wasn't me. It was this guy -> [link]
You've run out of ambition because you realized you were wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, I've run out of it because you are self-absorbent and it is pointless to continue arguing with you.
π: 0 β©: 1
You've realized you're wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
Again, no, I've realized I do not wish to fight with someone who will just continue to repeat themselves and have their partner jump in to assist. Nor do I wish to argue with someone who has the nerve to be rude to me on my own page, which actually puts you in a "bad light".
And majority does outweigh minority when looking at a scale, but when it comes to literal words, opinions, and society, majority can quickly be outrun by minority. Just thought you should know.
π: 0 β©: 1
You've realized you're wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
My pleasure. This chick is pissing me off, no joke :I And LOL did I just not see it before or she really did add "don't comment" to her artist's comments? 
π: 0 β©: 2
What I actually put was don't post if your only purpose was to be a smarta**. It is my pleasure to piss people off who are highly self-absorbed, though.
π: 0 β©: 0
She added it after me and Dame were replying to her x3. But yes, she forgot about asspats!
π: 0 β©: 1
Damn, I thought I was special D: Though I'll say I'm surprised she hasn't bawwleted this yet or hidden comments lol
π: 0 β©: 2
What a shock, I already said I don't hide comments. So go back to patting your own a**.
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
Think whatever you want.
π: 0 β©: 0
I think she gave up when I told her that actual pansexuality/omnisexuality is about being allowed to fuck your pets.
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
We shoulda done that with Hitler!
π: 0 β©: 1
So many solved problems with the magic of MANNERS!
π: 0 β©: 0
Hehe I love it!
Its very true :3
And woo~ we have a symbol~!
π: 0 β©: 1
True love may be blind, but engaging in perversion will kill you.
π: 0 β©: 3
BEING GAY ISNT HURTING SH!IT SHUT UP
π: 0 β©: 0
No one ever died from being homosexual or bisexual.
π: 0 β©: 1
Many died BECAUSE OF being homosexual (including Bisexual, Homosexual, and Trangender). Never said FROM BEING.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes I know this. I was telling them no one died because they were homosexual. Because I, you know, am against homo/biphobia.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, I am glad you are anti-homophobia. But I am not pleased with arguing with you over something so stupid.
This piece is dedicated to Pansexuality and does not refer to anything against the rest of the GLBT community. Nor does it state that others are "shallow", "don't know true love", and whatever else was said in these comments.
π: 0 β©: 1
Uh..I was replying to a homophobic person. Why are you mad I was replying to them? I can't defend homosexuality and bisexuality? =/
π: 0 β©: 1
Again, who said I am angry/mad?
And you can obviously defend whatever you wish since we have both in the past hour (at least).
π: 0 β©: 1
You got snippy at me when I was clearly standing up for homosexuals and bisexuals. I'm allowed to defend them. I don't need you saying I can't. Even you were against what they said, so you make very little sense, dear.
π: 0 β©: 1
Stand up for whatever your heart desires, hun.
π: 0 β©: 1
Then don't tell me not to, hun.
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>