HOME | DD

kevinbolk β€” Crappy IMOM Remix: Your Drawing Style is Lazy

Published: 2013-08-06 20:17:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 28318; Favourites: 1021; Downloads: 68
Redirect to original
Description 'Cuz sometimes I like to make crappy remixes of my old comics.

Read the ACTUAL "I'm My Own Mascot" comics here: www.kevinbolk.com/comic/mascot…

(in the name of honesty, I do actually make a living at this. XD)
Related content
Comments: 180

Weissboard [2014-05-30 06:10:36 +0000 UTC]

I got a laugh out of this one,it cuts across all forms of art.

You can actually be technically correct and yet do nothing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PokeyFluffytail [2014-04-03 17:52:07 +0000 UTC]

Everything you described about this guy, makes it seem like you were talking to Rob Liefeld. o3o

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

revolverwingstudios [2014-03-25 20:46:52 +0000 UTC]

Damn itΒ 
I feel so offended right now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LoveMySockhead12 [2014-02-16 01:42:30 +0000 UTC]

Wow... Wooow.. I just read ItisjustI's comment responses.. Seriously, what an asshole!

I hope I never have such a seriously messed up conversationΒ with anyone like that


You should hide those comments, Kev ;3;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpadeRiff [2014-01-28 17:47:49 +0000 UTC]

Not usually a habit of mine to butt in someone else's business but reading the comments below, wow -_-"

ItisjustI What an arse

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LoveMySockhead12 In reply to SpadeRiff [2014-02-16 01:44:06 +0000 UTC]

I know, huh? Not a good way to build a reputation... Especially on the internet.

I wonder if he's like that all the time? -3-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpadeRiff In reply to LoveMySockhead12 [2014-02-16 14:40:22 +0000 UTC]

Yes, quite shocking isn't it? Especially jarring since most folks I meet on dA are quite friendly

He's still being inexcusably rude; but maybe he has personal issues, who knows?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LoveMySockhead12 In reply to SpadeRiff [2014-02-16 19:41:51 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that's one of the reasons why I love dA so much

People here are so friendly! Unlike other websites like YouTube...

People are so touchy there! XD


Yeah.. Maybe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DTWX [2014-01-06 08:16:32 +0000 UTC]

"Can't draw Feet?"
You actually seem pretty good at it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ashtoledo [2013-12-24 17:14:25 +0000 UTC]

hashtag liefield

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Neoglitch17 [2013-11-23 00:55:38 +0000 UTC]

Sick. Burn.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

837659 [2013-10-28 01:10:16 +0000 UTC]

Not sure if someone already said this but I'm too lazy to comb through the comments. The fact that you said you make a living this way at the bottom add another layer of meta joke that you are the other guy in this comic instead of your avatar subtly poking fun at complainers. If this is intentional, you sir are too clever by half.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kuroitenshi13 [2013-10-24 23:08:05 +0000 UTC]

This is so true, I mean the best example is Lefield.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

warahi [2013-10-11 04:09:54 +0000 UTC]

To "Itisjustl" (since you decided to block me):


I never troll -_- if you're not going to take it seriously then that's not my problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ItisjustI [2013-09-23 23:21:46 +0000 UTC]

people who put out those complaints must never think of how MANY drawings a comic artist has to do. If their style seems lazy, it probably just means they literally cannot spend the time on each drawing to make it Michaelangelo Da Vinci Perfect. And yes, I know I combined the names of two artists. I do not care. Lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

warahi In reply to ItisjustI [2013-10-10 16:02:49 +0000 UTC]

or that they need improvement

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ItisjustI In reply to warahi [2013-10-11 01:54:06 +0000 UTC]

No thanks, troll. Not worth blabbing over.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

kiddinsdeluxe In reply to ItisjustI [2013-10-20 22:47:57 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure that that person "warahi" was only adding on, merely suggesting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ItisjustI In reply to kiddinsdeluxe [2013-10-20 23:31:39 +0000 UTC]

Good grief. "SUBJECT THAT'S LONG CLOSED" mean anything to you?! Give it a rest already. THIS WHOLE THREAD IS TOO FUCKING OLD TO KEEP ARGUING ABOUT.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kiddinsdeluxe In reply to ItisjustI [2013-10-21 00:39:19 +0000 UTC]

FIRST of all, no need to be so RUDE about it. SECOND, I know, I just felt that the way that you had responded to that person was a bit rude. But now I see that you're just like that with everyone.


Oh yeah and third; "Thread"?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ItisjustI In reply to kiddinsdeluxe [2013-10-21 00:49:15 +0000 UTC]

I'm rude because I keep getting bothered about this old crap by morons... No, you're not a moron; you're a jackass, because you, apparently, DO know better.

So. To recap: You knew it was old. You decided to bother me with it anyway. That means YOU were being rude, wasting my time on obsolete shit, AND being deliberately stupid, and any damage to your sensibilities caused by MY rudeness is beneath my contempt.

Finally, I have no interest in educating you about what the various little bits and pieces of these social sites are called. We all have to learn somewhere, sure, but it's not MY job, and frankly you've pissed me off too much. Go find out why I call it a "thread" on your own.

And, in conclusion, it's block time. Go fuck yourself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CoOkIisme In reply to ItisjustI [2014-04-22 20:04:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm not even bothered by your opinion. It's your attitude I'm pissed at. Just shut it. WAIT! Saying that would be rude. And I certainly don't know anyone who's rude. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ItisjustI In reply to CoOkIisme [2014-04-22 23:26:07 +0000 UTC]

I did shut it. IN OCTOBER. Boy are you stupid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

warahi In reply to ItisjustI [2013-10-11 02:22:00 +0000 UTC]

First off, what are you talking about? What are you saying "No thanks" to? There was nothing in my post to respond to with that.


Secondly I do not troll.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ItisjustI In reply to warahi [2013-10-11 03:33:29 +0000 UTC]

Your first reply to me was a trolling reply. You're just another jackass who wants to start a worthless fight over a subject that's long closed. "No thanks", I'm not wasting my time on you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FrostedIcefire [2013-09-19 20:47:23 +0000 UTC]

That's how I feel when my stuff gets 100 or less views and someone who I think is far worse gets 1000+. ;m;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sugashi [2013-09-18 03:31:15 +0000 UTC]

TAKE MY MONEY.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fireninjastar [2013-09-06 01:09:09 +0000 UTC]

*Roy McKie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fireninjastar [2013-09-06 01:08:43 +0000 UTC]

COUGH COUGH MIKE MCKIE


COUGH COUGH JIM DAVIS


COUGH COUGH CHARLES SCHULZ

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crysa91 In reply to Fireninjastar [2013-09-20 20:23:35 +0000 UTC]

Not everything in a comic needs to be anatomically correct. There is a such thing as recognizable style, you know. If they all drew everything the exact same way, would they still be recognizable?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Fireninjastar In reply to Crysa91 [2013-09-21 18:13:40 +0000 UTC]

Well everyone complains about anatomy for some reason to some instead of others



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Crysa91 In reply to Fireninjastar [2013-09-21 19:47:47 +0000 UTC]

To me it seems more important to create a signature than to have perfect drawing skill. In fact, some artists go through the whole accurate drawing curriculum and then they play with the rules a little. Really who's to say what is or is not a good style. As long as the meaning of the piece comes across clearly it really shouldn't matter.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

123carrottop [2013-09-03 23:33:54 +0000 UTC]

That's how I feel when other people get all sorts of favorites an comments an I think they're terrible :L

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chameleon-Veil [2013-09-02 20:44:12 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, Kaybo, mediocrity sells. It's a sad fact of life.Β 

Just know that your sales don't always necessarily reflect your work. There are plenty of people who like it! = D Keep on truckin', man.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nomorezombies [2013-08-29 04:37:27 +0000 UTC]

Is that...Randal Munroe I mean, he has unkempt hair, he looks like he's in his 20's, he draw all his characters the same, plus Randal Munroe is the only webcomic artist who makes his living from comics. ever.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

smallrinilady [2013-08-29 00:09:02 +0000 UTC]

~BURN~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Silversoul98 [2013-08-26 00:44:21 +0000 UTC]

I couldn't really help but think "rob liefeld"....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Doodlz18 [2013-08-25 01:36:31 +0000 UTC]

ow >.o

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FrozenBox [2013-08-23 14:18:52 +0000 UTC]

Ouch. Don't care. Making a living.


Seriously, I mean, I know I ain't good at drawing very well, and when I see others thar are worse than me actually making a living off it, I cry alittle inside.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

munnch In reply to FrozenBox [2015-01-15 04:07:50 +0000 UTC]

simplicity doesn't mean poor quality.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BauerPower24777 [2013-08-19 23:40:49 +0000 UTC]

Who's the other guy, Rob Liefeild?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DuskWingArts [2013-08-16 20:43:45 +0000 UTC]

awww -hug-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dendril [2013-08-15 21:31:57 +0000 UTC]

I think this speaks to a lot of people. xDΒ 
I love the last panel, although it's sadly true. / 3\

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

UncleScooter [2013-08-13 09:18:48 +0000 UTC]

Comic artists, like Rob Liefeld, happened- and we let them happen (do what you will with that bit of info)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KillerGhost13 [2013-08-13 00:11:35 +0000 UTC]

What's 'same face', do I do that? I'm freaking out cause I think i do it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DBfan4alltime In reply to KillerGhost13 [2013-08-16 15:37:02 +0000 UTC]

Same face is just as it sounds. It's when all your characters look the same usually because the artist is too lazy, incompetent, or uninspired to create more than 1 character. All the characters literally look like cardboard cutouts of each other with different hair and clothing.


Kevin's characters are so vast in design yet you can still tell what "universe" they were drawn into. Other artists may, in their attempt to create a "style", completely void their characters of any individuality.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tenchiz [2013-08-12 22:37:25 +0000 UTC]

ROFL! I shouldn't *snerf* laugh at *giggle* your pain. I'm sorry. *snort*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WindSage10235 [2013-08-12 21:40:29 +0000 UTC]

Touche

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Earl-of-Zerces [2013-08-09 17:54:04 +0000 UTC]

Ooh you lucky bastard. -3-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ajsanaje [2013-08-09 15:37:51 +0000 UTC]

Burrrrrnn

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>