HOME | DD
Kirol — Feather Drop II
Published: 2006-06-24 15:47:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 266; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 36
Redirect to original
Description
Guess who got Extension tubes?Lol.
They make for crazy close shots, although it means I need to keep everything REALLLLLLY still to have the ubermax macroness used.
I will get the hang of them soon enough, you'll see.
Related content
Comments: 16
Woah.... Really nice close-up shot. Brilliant, in fact.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The amount of light was low, so it was hard to keep the camera still...
It's a shame, because it makes it rather blurry with the apperture I used.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xD
Thanks.
£1,100 later and I can finally get some really decent pictures.
(That is how much I spent on my camera and parts for it. A hell of a lot, but some of it was for my birthday.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
you know, some people spend fortunes on cameras and still dont get any good pictures
you're doing quite allright.
i like this shot. I considered tubes myself, but agreed with myself that the next thing si gonna be a super wideangle lens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Heh.
I think next up on my list would have to be a Telephoto lens so I can do stuff like sports photography, perhaps.
Or... something like that.
Maybe I will get cheap lens-cap things that give different effects, such as fish-eye and polarisation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ah the fisheye lens caps arent worth it. they dont produse good quality.
telephoto is nice to have. i got a 75-300 from sigma, that was pretty cheap and quite nice. it even has a macro settings.
avoid the lens caps though.
polarisation filters helps a lot on sunny days when doing landscapes, reducing glare and making the sky blue. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I love blue skies. There arn't many times that there are blue blue skies over here, more grey-blue.
So the polarisation one would be nice to have...
And yeah, Sigma is the way to go.
How much was that 75~300?
My 105mm Macro lens was like... £300. x_x;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the 75-300 was about £200 i recon.
my canon 17.85 was slightly more expensive
👍: 0 ⏩: 1