HOME | DD

Published: 2011-06-14 20:32:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 102625; Favourites: 468; Downloads: 418
Redirect to original
Description
The Kingdom of American States had a tumultuous early history. Having won their independence from Britain in the dying years of the 18th century the thirteen colonies joined in a loose coalition of states. Unfortunately their coalition was flawed; the states fought constantly, both in the political arenas of federal government and, occasionally, on the battlefield. Their overlapping claims to territory, disputes over slavery and the disagreement about how the federal government should be organised caused constant friction.This enmity existed between the states themselves as well as between the state governments and the federal government in Philadelphia - it was rare for Virginia to listen to the decisions made by the Continental Congress less than 250 kilometres away, and the rest of the states wavered between obedience and outright defiance.
It was decided something must be done. Either the United States remained strong together, or divided and became weak. In Europe Kings and nobility laughed at the Americans - "Their 'Republican Experiment' has failed!" they cried, "No common, elected man could rule a country!". In America, many people agreed.
An absolute monarchy was out of the question, so America must have a monarch tempered by elected bodies and meritocratic institutions. But even after the Americans had decided on the constitution, who would be King?
Virginia and its southern allies championed George Washington - their hero of the revolutionary war! The northern states disagree - Virginia had too much power as it was without their statesmen sitting on the throne! Again the nation was split, until one man stepped forward.
Christian Friedrich Karl Alexander of the German noble house of Hohenzollern was not an unknown to the American people. In the last few years of the revolution Prussia had thrown in its lot with America, hoping to damage the powerful Britain and, with a little luck, gain a new ally. Their contribution to the war was small, but significant. A handful of men under the command of a low-ranking nobleman, Christian Friedrich.
Though late on the scene, Christian Friedrich's contribution to the war was disproportionately large. He took command of a small force of volunteers and was fundamental to the American victory in the Florida campaign. He wasn't the greatest hero of the war, but he wasn't from any state in particular and was liked by statesmen across the nation. He spoke English and French with no real accent from his native German, and his Spanish was passable - though he could have only spoken Chinese for all the Spanish-speaking Floridians cared.
The states were in agreement. They had a central government strong enough to decisively solve disputes between the states; they had a modern, centralised military to protect the nation; and they had a King.
The hardships were not over for the Americans, though. In the mid 1840s, as Europe was wracked by revolutions calling for more reasonable government and greater democracy, so too did the people of America call for action.
In the north many stood with the King - known as the Imperialists they favoured a strong, federal government headed by a powerful monarch. They believed in the American state and the power of a nation over the rights of the people. In the south there were the plantation owners and those who were pro-slavery - many called for the preservation of states' rights, some even believed it.
At first it looked like the states were to be locked in a political stalemate. Then the people called for some else, a sentiment much more powerful than thinly-veiled support for slavery. They called for a republic.
It wasn't just the south that rose, but the west too. The Oregon territory was home to some of America's greatest republican thinkers, and their people rose up in support of their ideals of reasonable government and freedom from tyranny.
The fighting was brutal and bloody. Brother fought brother, fathers fought their sons. Thousands died to move the line a mere inch, and fields and cities were burnt down and laid bare. Both sides took their share of the casualties until, one by one, everything the south had going for it started to fall apart.
Mexico, which had covertly supplied the revolutionaries with funding and arms, had to withdraw its support in the face of domestic rebels. Britain, who had remained staunchly neutral, threw its weighty opinion behind the Imperialists - it did little to help the war in the field, but it did much to sway opinion. The people of East Florida, who had not joined the revolution but had it imposed upon them, rose up against the republicans. In the West the republican armies were destroyed by Maj. Gen. Thomas Williamson's Army of Montana, and the Army of Virginia under Maj. Gen. Josias "Buffalo" Krieger routed the republican forces and captured Richmond. It took less than a year for the Imperialist forces to push their way down the Mississippi and force the republicans to surrender.
Britain's official backing of the imperialists during the war was a surprise. America had revolted from under British rule and they had remained rivals throughout America's history. Cynics claimed that the British merely supported the Imperialists in order to get in their good books, hoping for something in return once the war was over. Others claimed the British merely wanted to prevent the republicans from winning, fearing a similar revolution in Britain itself. Both of these reasons are true, but there were other factors that contributed towards Britain's decision. Many British politicians were staunchly abolitionist and had been appalled that the Kingdom of American States had not outlawed slavery entirely - seeing that one side of the war supported slavery, they supported the other. In addition to this more pragmatic British politicians observed America's local dominance of North America and saw that they could not hope to regain control of the region. Seeing the American States' as the "natural leader of North America" they hoped they could exert more influence over the world, as well as expand their trade empire, if America were their friend and ally.
In the latter half of the 19th century Britain truly came into its own as a world power. The dominance of the British empire over the globe was so effective and absolute that contemporary historians came to refer to the era as "the Glorious Peace" and the diplomatic system that allowed for this peace as "the Glorious Regime". In effect Britain had, through their advantages in trade and cunning diplomacy, created a system whereby they ruled the world through trade and could use concessions and sanctions as sticks and carrots to get the rest of the world to do what they want.
Britain was also willing to sacrifice their interest in favour of their allies in hopes of engendering an unwavering loyalty to the system. Portugal was promised line of territory running from the east coast of Africa in the Congo to the west coast in Mocambique and the Netherlands had Sri Lanka, Austronesia and various trade outposts handed over for a reasonable sum. In order to cement America's place in the Glorious Regime Britain made an offer of much of British North America, excluding the more populated east. America accepted and gave up a tidy sum in return for the confirmation of their position as the natural great power of the Americas. Following this purchase the Americans sought to broadcast to the rest of the world that they had come into their own, that they were a great power not to be messed with, and they did this with a simple name change. The Kingdom of American States had become an Empire.
In bringing America into the Regime Britain also paved the way for the Cape Verde purchase, whereby Portugal sold the Cape Verde islands to America as an outlying naval base in return for a decent sum and trade concessions, helping to bolster their dying economy and give the Portuguese King much needed support when republican revolutionaries looked to overthrow the outdated monarchy.
When Haiti revolted and called for annexation to the EAS Britain co-ordinated a diplomatic effort with Prussia to have France back down and concede the colony to the Empire. And when the Spanish-American War broke out Britain threw its support behind America, harassing Spanish shipping in Europe and imposing a blockade that allowed America to overrun its American and Pacific colonies unimpeded.
Now it is 1900 and America enters the 20th century as a great power united with Britain in an alliance that rules the world. But, as always, the struggle is never truly over.
***
This took a couple of weeks to make and finish, and it took me another week or two to get around to writing the description and actually posting it. Sorry it's so late, but I hope you enjoy it!
The title comes from a quote from Stephen Decatur ([link] ):
"Our country! In her intercourse with foreign nations, may she always be in the right; but our country, right or wrong!"
Related content
Comments: 130
WogofJog [2022-11-27 08:48:22 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
guapathecat [2021-03-23 22:48:31 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Kurarun In reply to crholb [2018-08-12 13:01:53 +0000 UTC]
Nah, I prefer how they look without it.
π: 0 β©: 1
crholb In reply to Kurarun [2019-07-11 11:49:34 +0000 UTC]
The Arizonian mob is gonna seal you in a barre
Submit Commentl filled with cacti and kick the barrel off into the Grand Canyon
π: 0 β©: 0
Abbieisurqueen [2017-12-17 03:00:48 +0000 UTC]
The abbreviation for our beautiful State of Maryland is MD, not ML.
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to Abbieisurqueen [2017-12-17 08:20:38 +0000 UTC]
Not in this timeline it ain't!
π: 0 β©: 1
Warsie [2017-10-27 06:40:30 +0000 UTC]
having played victoria II, I now know precisely how you basically ate off western canada. you warred with the UK for it and seized it basically before the British could settle the western areas and turn them into provinces lol
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to Warsie [2017-10-27 08:54:53 +0000 UTC]
Heh, I actually haven't played as the USA in Victoria II, though I think I've seen some maps of the USA doing exactly that in it!
π: 0 β©: 1
Warsie In reply to Kurarun [2017-11-15 03:08:37 +0000 UTC]
yeah, it makes sense. IRL the Americans could have done that (i.e. 48'40 or fight thing), so the game does model that part very well (even if the other stuff is a bit bullshit)
π: 0 β©: 0
filip2000ko [2017-04-16 12:19:33 +0000 UTC]
All hail the Most Sovereign Kingdom! Btw, does the EAS have a Chancellor or a Prime Minister as head of government? Also, does it have something like ''The Church of America'' akin to the Church of England? And last, but not least what happened to the Mormons? Do they even exist ITT?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to filip2000ko [2017-04-16 15:48:57 +0000 UTC]
I honestly don't have an answer for any of those questions. I made this map some time ago and haven't done anything with this timeline in ages, so I don't remember most of the details I worked out for it. Sorry about that.
π: 0 β©: 1
filip2000ko In reply to Kurarun [2017-04-16 19:21:38 +0000 UTC]
Don't worry! You are a talented artist.
π: 0 β©: 1
LeoKnightus [2016-08-26 17:01:03 +0000 UTC]
what program did you use mainly for this map?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to LeoKnightus [2016-08-26 23:06:48 +0000 UTC]
Inkscape! Pretty much everything except the worn paper texture was done in Inkscape.
π: 0 β©: 0
bruiser128 [2016-05-30 13:04:17 +0000 UTC]
It's a shame you aren't developing a timeline with so much potential.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to bruiser128 [2016-05-30 16:16:53 +0000 UTC]
I did put a lot of work into it, but I'm afraid it's just not interesting or inspiring to me any more.
π: 0 β©: 1
EmperorZoo [2015-12-25 01:49:31 +0000 UTC]
Was there a civil war in this timeline? I notice West Virginia doesn't exist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to EmperorZoo [2015-12-25 14:26:24 +0000 UTC]
I'm not actively developing this timeline any more, but there was meant to be a civil war - it was a mix of pro-slavery and anti-monarchical sentiment in this timeline, and included some of the west coast states (who were more in it for the anti-monarchy part than the pro-slavery part). I didn't work it out in any great detail, though.
π: 0 β©: 1
BadgingBadger In reply to BadgingBadger [2015-10-02 20:38:11 +0000 UTC]
Either way, where did you find these pictures on the bottom corners?
π: 0 β©: 0
SD80MACfan [2015-05-11 16:50:24 +0000 UTC]
A couple questions.
1. How was America able to acquire East and West Florida, Cuba, and Haiti compared to our timeline?
2. How did America acquire Texas from Mexico?
3. Do you have a map of the divisions during the Civil War in this timeline?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to SD80MACfan [2015-05-11 19:11:32 +0000 UTC]
I've mostly abandoned this timeline, so I don't remember everything I worked out for it, but I'll answer your questions to the best of my ability.
1. If I remember right East and West Florida revolted with/were captured by the revolutionaries in the alternate American Revolution of this timeline. I mentioned Haiti quickly in the description - apparently I decided it revolted and asked for annexation, though I'm not quite sure what the specifics would be.
2. I don't know for sure, but most likely through war, as in OTL.
3. Sorry, I don't. As I said I've mostly abandoned this timeline so it's unlikely that I'll come back and make one, I'm afraid.
π: 0 β©: 1
SD80MACfan In reply to Kurarun [2015-05-25 17:02:17 +0000 UTC]
Alright, thanks. It's a disappointment that you've abandoned this timeline as I believe that it has a lot of merit to it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Canadakid97 [2015-04-29 02:02:02 +0000 UTC]
Hey I really love this map! Check out my French North American alternate history map in this link:Β canadakid97.deviantart.com/artβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
DurinVIII [2014-09-27 03:48:16 +0000 UTC]
How come they never bought Alaska? It may have explained that and I missed it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to DurinVIII [2014-09-27 21:15:31 +0000 UTC]
I made this map ages ago - I may have had an explanation in mind at the time, but I don't remember what it is now. It was probably that the Russians found gold there before they sold it and decided to keep it instead.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtOfAnrach In reply to Kurarun [2015-01-24 19:47:32 +0000 UTC]
Another reason you might consider is that Russia originally sold Alaska to the United States as a way of keeping it out of British hands. Russia and Britain had quite the rivalry and the Russians knew that if it came to war and Britain wanted to take Alaska then there would be nothing they could do about it. Essentially Alaska was a disaster waiting to happen for the Russians so they decided to cut their losses and try to make some money off of the territory. If in this world the Americans were allied with the British then there would be no real desire to sell the territory to them since America and Russia would likely not be on good diplomatic terms.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Arbarano [2014-05-17 13:47:10 +0000 UTC]
You forgot CM in your table. Is it for Columbia?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to Arbarano [2014-05-17 14:00:06 +0000 UTC]
No I didn't (it's the second one underneath the "States, Provinces, and Commonwealths of the Empire" box), and yes it is.
π: 0 β©: 0
MTARIOS In reply to Kurarun [2014-03-14 19:49:55 +0000 UTC]
It's cool. It is a very interesting concept.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Kurarun In reply to coldblood11 [2014-01-04 18:51:53 +0000 UTC]
Heh, thanks! I was planning to make it a full timeline at some point, but my enthusiasm and inspiration for the project has unfortunately declined (as has my assessment of how plausible it is). I might get around to revitalising it... after I write this Afghanistan timeline, and design this fantasy world, and write this ASB timeline, and design this other fantasy world...
π: 0 β©: 1
coldblood11 In reply to Kurarun [2014-01-05 09:18:36 +0000 UTC]
Also, great idea with the Hohenzollern Dynasty... me was thrilled, considering it was the same dynasty that ruled Romania (my homeland) during the 19th Century.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
SomeRandomMinion [2013-12-20 21:37:17 +0000 UTC]
American Monarchy?
You have my interest...
π: 0 β©: 0
KantiaCartography [2013-07-09 19:41:19 +0000 UTC]
I see it says "States, provinces, and commonwealths", so what would the "provinces" be?
π: 0 β©: 1
Kurarun In reply to KantiaCartography [2013-07-10 00:37:07 +0000 UTC]
"States, provinces, and commonwealths" all have the same federal status; they're just named differently. A couple of modern US states are officially called commonwealths, in this world there are a fair few more commonwealths, and some of the states shown - mainly those in former British North America/Canada, and a few nearby states that became states after the joining of the British/Canadian territory - are named provinces.
π: 0 β©: 1
KantiaCartography In reply to Kurarun [2013-07-10 02:53:57 +0000 UTC]
Ohhhh okay, I didnt realize that the former British provinces didnt become "states" of their own. New concept, and I like it.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>