HOME | DD
lemmonade — M-81 A2
Published: 2008-02-16 23:34:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 11419; Favourites: 70; Downloads: 203
Redirect to original
Description
OMG FINALY today is a revalation. i acctualy DREW this gun. i didnt trace a single bit of it. all of it is new lolok so this gun, for this one i aimed to make an assuat rifle out of an smg. so i took my ump 45 and i deleted eveyrthing exept for the center and then i drew everything else so pretty much i just extended and smg into a rifle its mad nasty
so its inspired by the ump so techniclly this gun is 25% traced. meh. its a start
Stats:
-45 caliber
-35 Round clip
-Suppressed muzzle flash and sound
-Light weight
-Accurate
-Ergonomic
-Reduced and/or eliminated up-drift
-Capable of full auto, three shot burst, and single shot
Attachments:
-ACOG 2x Scope
-M203 Grenade launcher
-Silencer (made with gun)
-IR and Visible Laser Pointer
Related content
Comments: 94
bad Idea. The silencer is useless if you use regular ammo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
not so much
it still makes i sonic crack i know, but it definalty deafens some of the bang
plus newer silencers have a large cavitiy to accomidate for the sonic crack
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Glad to know that some people know their stuff, I see a lot of these "weapon creators" around posting their fictional weapons that don't even have a dang clue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes thank you 
its an older one
some of my newer designs are much better
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Looks nice, though a .45 assault rifle? and the UMP is an assault rifle conversion into a SMG (G36 --> UMP, like G3 --> MP5). But other than that, it looks like it would be unpleasant to see hostile soldiers carry it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
really? SWEET!! lol
ya i would pee my pants to see this thing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, if you got the time to do that you'd surely do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cool i read almost all of it
thnx for helpin me out man i agree with most of it
just cant belive that they didnt use the OICW and the m14 is an assualt rifle
i just made up a definition. an assualt rifle is a rifle used in assualts. thats where i got my definition of sniper rifle (a sniper rifle is a rifle that you snipe with) becuase theres only 2 sniper rifles i will use in call of duty, my m16a4 with acog and my berrett cuz technicly the m16 is a sniper rifle if you pop a scope on top
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
By the way, the OICW is a piece of crap. It's an underpowered, way too heavy rifle. Better to use an M16 with an M203 on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
but it has a guncam
thats kills around corners
again theres also the fn-f2000
so ya guncams r sweet
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You know how much a guncam weighs? It's really, really heavy. Use grenades instead.
The F2000 is a fine rifle, I've heard good reports about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A sniper rifle is hard to define, but technically, an M16 is not a sniper rifle if you put a scope on it, it's a Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR). It's not nearly accurate enough to be a true sniper rifle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i no but its more accurate than the berrett even with the lowered accuracy that the acog causes in cod4
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
COD 4 is no measure for actual combat effectiveness. The Barrett is, in reality, far more accurate and at far longer ranges than the M16/AR-15.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i know lol
thnx for all the help and advice man
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What kind of .45 caliber round are you shooting? It looks significantly longer than .45 ACP. That sort of round would have really harsh recoil, the sort that would probably be useless on full-auto. Not to mention you're have terrible drop due to having a bad BC. You're velocity would probably be very high, though, if you raised the pressure to about 57,000 PSI. This would be a shoulder-punisher, for sure. Not to mention that clip could not hold 35 rounds of .45 unless it was triple-stacked. the UMP holds 25 with its big clip, and that is no bigger. You'd have the same diameter bullet as the UMP and (probably, it would be at least as big, anyway) the same diameter case. That means that mag will only hold 25 rounds. The stock is a big combersome, too. I'd just knock off all the extra plastic, unless, of course, you've got lead weights in there to control recoil (don't laugh, I've heard of it). You theoretically could have a constant-recoil system, I suppose, but you'd have to widen the butt a bit. that would make the weapon much more feasible. However, it would not be considered an assault rifle, just a big-ass SMG (and probably a kickass one, too, though SMG effectiveness is rather strange.). Are you still using the straight-blowback of the UMP-45 or have you changed it to something more robust, like gas-operation? I think you'd have to, with a big round like your .45. Of course, Atchisson used blowback for 12 Gauge, so who knows? I do, however, love the concept of an M203 on an SMG.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
As far as i know the UMP isn't blowback operated, but uses a gas piston instead, since they're basicaly G36 rifles made to fire a pistol caliber round (like the MP5 is to the G3)
But then again, I'm not always right, so feel free to flame me if I'm wrong^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do believe the UMP is not merely a G36 firing a pistol round, but basically a classic blowback subgun that looks neat. Thank you, HK, for selling us something we already had. According to Max Popenker (who pretty much knows these things) it is blowback.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
o.O maybe I was wrong.
*looks it up*
Hmm, you're right. Then, my next question is, how did i get the impression the UMP was a "G36 copy"? I guess that is because they look more or less similar, but even so, that's mainly the G36C then (front and rear iron sighs are similar, viewed from the side). Oh nevermind, I probaly just made up something and forgot I made it up right after I made it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I totally do that. ^_^ Dude. I just realized how much gun info is on DeviantArt thanks to me. Wow. There's quite a bit of both raw info and theory here. Geez.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, we're all just a bunch of food consuming, air breathing and liquid drinking gun nuts who like to share some information and idea's every now and then. Welcome to reality^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I LOVE GUNZORZ!!!
Truly, though, I do.
I'm getting my first rifle soon (already have a shottie). Wheeeee!!!
It's either gonna be an Enfield No. 4 Mk. II or a Yugo SKS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, well, who doesn't? (well, just the unlucky person that happens to be at the wrong end of one)
Cool, unfortunately, I (incase I don't move to america or something) will probably never be able to own a long gun or anything bigger than the M9, since my countries laws don't premit that, though there arn't as much deaths caused by gunfire here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, I know a bunch of people over here who HATE guns. I'm an American, thankfully, so we have really good gun laws (thank you, 2nd Amendment.) What country are you from?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
A. Bush can turn a law donw without any apporval.
B. Relatively seen, no. We, the Dutch, and more european countries have actualy paid off some of america's debts, and have very little debt of your own.
C. I totaly agree with you on this point, but still, 0.9 million for a missile. If it were a nuclear missile it'd be different, since weapon grade uranium is VERY expensive (<-- big understatement).
D. Then your definition of perfect is different from mine, and from 6 billion other people (the remaining 0.3 billion being americans and pro americans who don't live in the US)
E. Could be, but relatively seen, China has less murders than you (not by much though, excluiding executions, by which china severely outnumbers all others combined)
F. That's now what i'm saying (well, maybe it was, but then i ment something different), you came in, you raped them, if you were to leave now, it'd go wrong again, though if you were to give Iraq a stable government, and get the Iraqi citizen to comply, then you can leave.
G. Did you know that the story Al Gore told us wasn't really right, since earth's greenhouse gas cycle makes 10000 year loops, in which a peak aprears, at which we're right now. Gore never told us anything about that cycle. Though he is kind of right, we're supercharging the whole proces. That was about global warming, now pop your gasket. I'll watch.
H. They may be socialists, but socialism is a branch in democracy, which focuses on giving the inhabitants of a country the most power, which makes it extra democratic, since democracy comes from the greek words "demos" and "kratos", meaning "people" and "might", respectively, thus meaning that the people have the most power.
I. Could be. havn't developed an opinion about that, because we didn't get that at school yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A.) Yeah,and congress can overturn the veto with a 2/3s vote. It's called balance of powers.
B.) Are you saying the IRS isn't a bunch of fucktards? You've never had to deal with them! I never said we didn't spend too much. We do. I agree with you there.
C.) The government overspends, no one is arguing with you there. And it'sa freaking good missile, too.
D.) Really? My sister married a Japanese man, lived in Japan for 6-odd years and had a kid in Japan. Guess what? Neither her not her Japanese man want to live in Japan anymore! They are killing themselves trying to get him over here. As for perfect, I'm sure your definition is some kind Utopian semi-Marxist society where everyone dances in a circle and eats flowers. Mine is freedom. Freedom for everyone and from the government. American beats every other nation in this respect (though we're rapidly heading in the wrong direction).
E.) No, China has less reported murders than we do.
F.) What the frack do you think we're trying to do!? Produce opium? (that's Afghanistan)
G.) Not really right!? How about Gore is a complete fuckhead (please pardon my language, I'm not in the best of moods right now)? He is. He has no idea what he's talking about and needs severely to be pantsed in public. I really don't feel like debating global warming right now, some other time, please.
H.) Incorrect. Socialism is about giving the people the most benefits, which inherently decreases their power. I'll explain that some other time, too.
I.) I also don't want to discuss why parliaments suck right now, either. I'm pretty tired.
Feel free to respond to anything but G and I. I don't have the time nor energy for either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A. evenso, with a majority (though not all) of counter votes, he can still has his veto.
B. well, then we have this sorted out.
C. Same as point B
D. And exacly that rapid heading in a wrong direction is the big issue with america, thoug i believe that's what happens to superpowers. But if it is freedom you want, become anarchist, and deny any form of leadership. that's pure freedom.
E. So then, can you prove they have relatively less murders?
F. Well, whatever you're doing, you're doing it wrong.
G. Gore is merely a robot that built by aliens to tell us we're living the wrong way. No seriously, do you think someone who can be elected to be the US' president can make up a story taht big? I thought not.
H. Well, that's not what they told me, or what i thought they were telling me.
I. Well, then i'll just agree for now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A.) That's why we have balance of powers! One branch being able to counter another is what that is all about! And it's the prime thing that parliamentary systems lack. The Legislative Branch and the Judicial Branch both have power over the Executive Branch. And the Judicial over the Legislative and so on and so forth.
D.) You need true freedom.True freedom comes from having people leave each other alone enough to be productive.
E.) I currently do not have the information to say what China's murder rate is.
F.) How do you come to the conclusion that we are doing it wrong in Iraq? Did you know that we have experienced less deaths in Iraq in recent months than ever before?
G.) Yes, actually, I do. And I think you're a fool to believe it's impossible.
H.) You should not believe what "they" tell you. In fact, do not believe what I tell you, make up your own damn mind.
I.) Okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A. No, a balance would be 50%.
D. No, true freedom is without leadership, with the people being able to govern themselves.
E. Then let's drop this too.
F. If you were doing it right you weould have been gone already.
G. No, don't you see it? There is someone out there convinced Gore tell his story, because Gore is a person with a big name, and the guy that made up the story is someone very few know about, so no one would believe him.
H. I've been making up my mind own mind my whole goddamn life, but about things that don't really interest me I just take opinions I randomly happen to find, and piece them together somehow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Dammit! I keep forgetting to answer all the points!
G.) Of course I see that! I even know his name! Paul Erhlich. I thought you were saying what Gore said was true. Maybe I'm nuts.
H.) I have no idea what a regular Hollander's schedule is like, but I think you could find the time. Just keep interest in it and don't be afraid to say "I don't know enough to have an opinion".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
D.) You are pretty much delusional here.
E.) No sir. We're still in Japan and Germany. The earliest we could have left those two nations would be about the '50s (Germany was a bit earlier, but Iraq is more comparable to Japan in the kind of cultural changes needed). That's about 10 years, roughly. Add to Iraq the 3 years we spent pissing around doing things wrong (2003-2006), then we should be out about 2016, by reasonable date. If we had done things correctly, we'd still have five years to go.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
D. Don't you agree? To achieve total freedom, one must reject any kind of leadership. In other words, true freedom is having no one to tell you what you can and can't do.
E. o.O what has this to do with china's murder rates?
G. See? Though what he tells us is true. Thing is, it's not complete. Earth's atmosphere's CO2 level makes 10000 year cycles, In which we're at a peak now. Gore never told us anything about that cycle. Though we are helping the CO2 levels to rise. There also is a sort of "counter video" (called "The Global Warming Swindle") to Gore's, which states the fact about those clycles, though it leaves out the human influence.
H. Well that's what I do, more or less. I listen (or read or whatever) to what is said (or written) and copy the opinions in it, until i have enough information to get my own conclusions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oopsies, I used the wrong letter for E.).
D.) No, I don't. I can have the freedom to follow a leader. You can have freedom without chaos, my friend. If you have an anti-government, that is, a society that resists any kind of leadership, that is infringing on people's rights and freedoms. Do not confuse leadership with lack of freedom.
G.) I think what he tells us is complete fubar, though I really don't feel like backing it up at this time.
H.) And try not to read any Socialist's stuff, because they tend to be nutty and not know how people work at all (I'm looking at you, Marx). But Who am I to tell you?
By the way, the comment just below this one is actually the response to A.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
D. the problem with a leader is, is that he will most probably set some limits, which cut's on your freedom. I do agree that without leadership, a community would go completely crazy if they are anything less than perfect humam beings.
G. he does tell us that, though it's not as bad as he says.
H. Didn't Marx invent communism?
BTW, we're going horribly off topic don't we?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
D. That's what the Constitution is for!
G. Tell us what? fubar? Yeah, what he says is a bunch of bullshit. Probably not a true word in the entire film.
H. Yes. It's a variant of Socialism. At least very closely related.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
D. Ahah.
G. Well, he tells it like we're heading straight for the apocalypse unless we forbit everything that exhausts CO2 (which means about 90% off all machinery, most of it indirect but whatever). But most of it is true, though his conclusion is wrong, because he left back some importment information. But then again, if you were to tell everyone that (about the carbon-dioxide cycle), everyone would be like: "Oh, so it's not a that big deal."
H. Hmm, okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G.) Dude, I love you. You're not entirely correct, I think. But you're fucking sane.
H.) I may be wrong, but they operate very similarly, anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G. We could just be friends . . . see, i already have a girlfriend, and i'm not gay ^^
H. Well, as far as i know, communism is about doing everything for everyone. of you grow wheat for instance, it's not your wheat, for you to sell, it's the state's wheat, for the state to sell, or to hand to bakers which turn it into bread, which inturn is the state's bread, since everything in a communisic country is owned by the state (which is in general sense everyone, though everyone wants something different, so there is a tiny group of elite, which make up 99% out of 99% of the state (I dont know where the other 1% went^^) and also decide where everything goes and stuff. as for socialism, I was wrong I see now, it's actualy capitalism, without own property, more or less (and private proberty, frankly is 1 of the things capitalism is about). Though it still retrains the economical freedom.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOLZORZ.
Communism is Uber-Socialism, really.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, actualy it's the other way (socialism being demi-comunism), but if i say I don't agree with you i'd be lying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>