HOME | DD

#dragon #fantasy #serpent #wyrm #basillisk #dungeons_and_dragons
Published: 2012-03-15 16:22:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 11951; Favourites: 250; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
This is the basilisk, no not the D&D basilisk or the World of Warcraft basilisk, but the mythological basilisk, which was a serpent or wyrm with a crest/crown. I imagine they range in color from brown, grey to green with stripes and designs of various colors and shapes depending on the terrain. Out of all the wyrms this is probably the most cross terrain one, found in deserts, forests, caves, etc...So it may have very different markings as opposed to other wrym species. I imagine it is very large, probably 40-50 feet. It has a poisonous breath weapon and, of course, a petrifying gaze. I imagine when it's hunting it uses its venomous breath and bite so it can eat its prey and when it's defending itself or scared it used its gaze, since it cannot eat the petrified victim. So if it's hunting you are somewhat better off than if it was threatened or scared.I imagine it's as smart as a low intelligence person and cannot talk, but is capable of advanced emotion and some reasoning.
Some of you may have noticed i categorized the basilisk in with the Wyrm species. Some of you may not agree, but that whole cohesive world and dealing with cross culture myths means we could, in a fantasy hypothetical way, say that the Greeks didn't know what wyrms were and that it was a Greek wyrm. Much like the tapir and hippo are relatives of the horse but no one would have known unless modern zoology pointed this out. We can assume medieval fantasy people are too ignorant to realize this (maybe gnomes and goblins) but me and you are privy to this.
Related content
Comments: 25
JEart94 [2023-08-22 22:26:04 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
WhIppIng-b0y [2021-11-14 19:49:13 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Level9Drow In reply to kevinobill [2020-04-28 06:37:58 +0000 UTC]
Greek? One of those Hellenistic cultures. Once again D&D misrepresented the Basilisk from proper myth. They made it a lizard with multiple legs. I honestly don't understand TSR's arbitrary choices back then. They are giant snakes with a crown. Now every fantasy copies the lizard. It's a testament to the damage TSR has done. Thousands of years a crowned snake. And then some arrogant artist at TSR completely changes it with no grounds. Ah well. Harry Potter remembered what a proper Basilisk was.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
myway24454 [2014-03-01 16:39:00 +0000 UTC]
I'm surprised there are no Harry Potter references.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Level9Drow In reply to myway24454 [2014-03-05 02:38:46 +0000 UTC]
not necessary really, they got it right and the basilisk was a serpent before Harry Potter. I think the Amphisbean and the Cockatrice grayed the lines a bit and it became a multi-legged lizard at some point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndrewDent [2012-03-16 01:48:00 +0000 UTC]
Dayum! This is amazing I love giant snake beasts ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lordoffantasy [2012-03-15 17:14:33 +0000 UTC]
imposing creature. though, as memory seves me, the basilisk and cockatrice were both basically the same creature, a mutant chicken with said abilities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lordoffantasy In reply to Level9Drow [2012-03-15 20:22:30 +0000 UTC]
then again, which is more imposing; a draconic cobra, or a chicken?
......if i have but one critique, it is the trail. reminds me too much of a movie caleld king cobra; b hack movie, but the oversized snake was a mix of cobra and rattler, and had a rattler's tail, like this guy. love the side spikes though, just like the more primitive constrictors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Level9Drow In reply to Lordoffantasy [2012-03-15 21:34:25 +0000 UTC]
The cockatrice was THE wyvern. There was no wyvern before it and it was the first to be named so. I will be adding it in the mix soon. so there is room and character enough for both to exist.
Another creature that sprung from the cockatrice/basilist was the amphisbean, yet another mythological "evolution" we see in culture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lordoffantasy In reply to Lordoffantasy [2012-03-15 20:31:17 +0000 UTC]
kind of a bit of irony you have here though. snakes are a species that evolved form limbed reptiles, and in your case dragons seem to evolve from limbless reptiles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Level9Drow [2012-03-15 16:41:29 +0000 UTC]
I gave him rudamentary appendages denoting the future evolution fo legs. Maybe it is a primative wyrm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DreamChronicler [2012-03-15 16:26:34 +0000 UTC]
So far I have really liked yoir works. Especially the wyrms have been the most creative. Maybe because we usually see them so rarely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DreamChronicler In reply to Level9Drow [2012-03-15 17:29:17 +0000 UTC]
So you use this works for your RP's? I read the journal about your idea of making your own monster manual. Rather ambitious goal I must say. I can remember to have considered the same but never got around to do it. As I already have enough things to do with other stuff. But hey at some point can I use your basic desing of the monster as visual for Pathfinder encounter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0