HOME | DD

Published: 2013-01-22 17:16:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 2174; Favourites: 28; Downloads: 11
Redirect to original
Description
Use the cross-eyed method if you don't have anaglyph red-cyan 3D glassesIf it just goes blurry, you should try moving closer or further away from your screen to get it working properly.
Related content
Comments: 30
Stookam [2014-01-03 15:38:10 +0000 UTC]
I can't get the cross-eyed method to work - the only thing I'm seeing in 3D is the tip of my nose, lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
XxArtstlily101xX [2013-08-27 21:09:02 +0000 UTC]
i didnt even know about the crossing your eyes trick XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LockRikard In reply to lires [2013-01-23 06:20:41 +0000 UTC]
No problem! I always like to learn new things
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lires In reply to LockRikard [2013-01-23 07:08:04 +0000 UTC]
And if you want, you can also view some of my stereoscopics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to lires [2013-01-23 15:34:43 +0000 UTC]
Saw them now, and wow! You're great at making stereoscopics with "2D" drawings!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SecminourTheThird [2013-01-23 00:53:56 +0000 UTC]
I always keep a pair of classic 3D glasses handy.
...admittedly,they've been sitting on my "shelf" for quite a while now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RobbieDaBoo [2013-01-22 23:20:15 +0000 UTC]
Or just Cosplay as kurtjmac. lol
Can you do something with Kurt, his wolf, and the Far Lands? Maybe Kurt is standing on a beach, arms crossed and a diamond sword stuck in the ground, with his wolf sitting next to him looking up at him. And in the background, rising like a wall from the ocean, the Far Lands.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to RobbieDaBoo [2013-01-23 06:05:35 +0000 UTC]
I've already done something with FLoB
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RobbieDaBoo In reply to LockRikard [2013-01-23 20:07:32 +0000 UTC]
Oh. Ever thought of remaking it, though?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to RobbieDaBoo [2013-01-23 20:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Only if it was a different scene.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
94081lego [2013-01-22 21:25:54 +0000 UTC]
This is probably one of the most creative things I have ever seen with 3-D imagery. Well Done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to 94081lego [2013-01-22 21:50:37 +0000 UTC]
You calling this creative?
Stereoscopic 3D imaging have existed for years, man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
94081lego In reply to LockRikard [2013-01-22 22:02:34 +0000 UTC]
Yes, but the idea of combining them with an image that's already 3-D is new to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to 94081lego [2013-01-22 22:16:23 +0000 UTC]
Every rendered picture is 3D in the same way as a photograph is
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
94081lego In reply to LockRikard [2013-01-22 22:30:11 +0000 UTC]
No I mean combining two dimensional 3-D with stereoscopic 3-D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to 94081lego [2013-01-22 22:33:55 +0000 UTC]
So you're saying that the fact of using stereoscopy within computer-generated images is new to you?
That's how they get 3D in those animated films
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
94081lego In reply to LockRikard [2013-01-23 00:41:04 +0000 UTC]
Not the glasses 3-D thing, the one that you used on the top, which doesn't require glasses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to 94081lego [2013-01-23 06:06:35 +0000 UTC]
Oh that, I first saw that in the various 3D modes on youtube some years ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Piidge [2013-01-22 20:24:11 +0000 UTC]
Sometime I wish they had a 3-D method that works with those 3-D glasses you get at the movies now. The ones that are just clear and not red and cyan.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LockRikard In reply to Piidge [2013-01-22 21:04:06 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, but those are either shutter or polarized systems, which require special displays and all that.
It'll probably come in the future at some point
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cheekymoomoo [2013-01-22 17:28:55 +0000 UTC]
*puts old 3D glasses over glasses" wow amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0