HOME | DD
MaciejKarcz —
Balance
Published: 2007-11-12 17:05:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 19542; Favourites: 1108; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Form is no other than emptiness, emptiness no other than form...Branches in water.
Natural calligraphy.
Nikon D200
Sigma 70-200 F2.8 EX HSM lens
Related content
Comments: 324
I just keep staring and staring at it. It's so beautiful and mind cooling.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*frowns softly*
Someday I really need to give up on this art community thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Concerns should be addressed to gallery moderators
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Looks like the name of one of them Death or Black Metal bands written in some macabre lettering that renders the band's moniker all but indecipherable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Really great photograph - very much like a haiku photograph in both subject matter and form.
Hope you are having a great day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My pleasure. It's a lovely image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Impressive, all the more so with it being a photograph..
Made me think of barbed wire before reading that it was actually branches.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I honestly thought this was done in pen or pencil until i read yur description and looked closer. Very cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i thought it was just a lot of black lines on white when i first saw it but when i got it full view it looks really awesome! there's a lot of ideas in there..
nice shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because it's all spiky and could pass as text in an indecipherable font
[link] <- see what I mean?
Fantastic picture nonetheless
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's so simple - yet so absolutely visually stunning. It's also very conceptually and logically challenging. I like it!
Truly, there's more to this than meets the eye. Is this really a photograph? Is it a painting? Is it a sculpture? All of the above? I guess the truth is under the water.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're welcome. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You don't appear to be a photographer, why would you call it a manipulation? It's not hard to do, find a still object in water and take a long exposure. It's a high-key technique which is standard in photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think, what I meant, is if the scene actually looks exactly like this, or if you used some kind of technique to make it more interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
High key technique: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
What makes you say that? It's a very narrow view that says if something is largely different from what is normally obtained from a medium or method it must be faked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't know what you mean by "faked". If someone showed me a picture of a two headed dog, my first reaction is to ask them if they manipulated the photo.
I don't know if it's somehow an insult to photographers to ask if the photo actually looks like that cool in real life, or if they made it look cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>