HOME | DD

macrophoto — Tutorial: Microphotography

Published: 2005-05-19 22:04:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 22055; Favourites: 141; Downloads: 6943
Redirect to original
Description Researched, written, photographed, and compiled by .

Please DO NOT use this tutorial to any other websites. However, feel free to link to it. We appreciate your cooperation!

If you notice any spelling, grammar, or other mistakes, send *QuiGonJediJinn a note and let him know he messed up.

Thanks,
Admin Tim
*QuiGonJediJinn
Related content
Comments: 106

mizzuae [2005-11-24 11:17:36 +0000 UTC]

wow I would never think about it this way. It's great guys!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KalbaxEcnailla [2005-11-17 03:35:53 +0000 UTC]

Wow, how great. I'll pray that my dad lets me use his Nikon D70 for this

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to KalbaxEcnailla [2005-11-17 03:44:45 +0000 UTC]

do it together! it would be a nice father daughter bonding expirence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KalbaxEcnailla In reply to macrophoto [2005-11-17 03:45:32 +0000 UTC]

haha, true true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rastarican In reply to ??? [2005-11-03 13:41:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for a very written (clear article) I have a rebel xt with a 70-300 zoom, think I'll go and play for a while.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to Rastarican [2005-11-03 15:30:12 +0000 UTC]

you're quite welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Terrorhead [2005-10-26 22:46:42 +0000 UTC]

This tripod looks just like mine anyway nice tutorial

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrFez In reply to ??? [2005-10-26 22:28:13 +0000 UTC]

Can anyone suggest a brand or general type of tape to use to avoid residue?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to MrFez [2005-10-26 23:36:13 +0000 UTC]

clear packing tape will generally not leave residue. that's what i usually use. as long as you keep it out of the heat, you should be fine. i can't make any guarantees tho. you could also try masking tape or clear scotch tape.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrFez In reply to macrophoto [2005-10-27 18:08:17 +0000 UTC]

I'll be careful and try some tests with those. I shan't come crying if I mess it up either, so thanks for the tips!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

disinformatique [2005-10-22 18:27:48 +0000 UTC]

Here is another great method of making a super mac gun

[link]

chris

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to disinformatique [2005-10-22 19:39:32 +0000 UTC]

yea, that's the same technique but done buying actual parts instead of taping stuff together. they also used an extender ring with increases the magnification.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disinformatique In reply to macrophoto [2005-10-23 07:37:04 +0000 UTC]

yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stiangodo In reply to ??? [2005-09-09 06:56:47 +0000 UTC]

Interesting!
I'll try this sometime..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Silentwaters [2005-08-16 18:40:33 +0000 UTC]

Thx for this TuTor

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bekind20thers [2005-08-14 20:56:26 +0000 UTC]

I was referred to this from another deviant, very interesting idea. I have tried it yet. I sent you a note.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sidetracked In reply to ??? [2005-07-19 19:42:10 +0000 UTC]

Wow! incredible! Thanks for writing a great article!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sidetracked [2005-07-19 19:37:34 +0000 UTC]

Wow! incredible! Thanks for writing a great article!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crisvsv [2005-06-28 16:13:05 +0000 UTC]

It is very useful!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

photoshoptutors [2005-06-23 21:18:23 +0000 UTC]

a really lovely tutorial

cheers
jaako

p.s. come by the *photoshoptutors club

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cliffhanger [2005-05-26 05:27:14 +0000 UTC]

WOW i have that 50mm lenses can i use with another 28-80?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anon-irisX [2005-05-23 08:01:04 +0000 UTC]

I tried this with my Olympus OM40's 50mm strapped to an 80-200mm. Smick as.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FuzZbR In reply to ??? [2005-05-22 02:43:23 +0000 UTC]

good work!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Elementgfx [2005-05-22 02:29:20 +0000 UTC]

faccinating, ive been wondering for a while how to do this, and now i know! thats alot man, i appreciate your efforts...

now i just have to try it..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chickow [2005-05-21 14:58:20 +0000 UTC]

nice tutorial.. but me and my darling are using this technique since some months.. I've buyed an special part of a company for my camera to have an easier handling...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

steelangel In reply to ??? [2005-05-20 12:37:42 +0000 UTC]

thnku for the tutorial

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hellhoundp2k In reply to ??? [2005-05-20 11:15:54 +0000 UTC]

.. reversing rings could also be used, for those that can get thier hands on one This does the taping job for you, so that you wont have to fumble with it, or worse, if you don't have tape, you're holding the lens yourself. It's a spiffy little tool. I was waiting for something like this to come out, because I always noticed that my lens on my camera, when ye take it off, it can be used as a huuge magnifying glass! and me, being into macro was puzzled as to why the camera doesn't permit this awesome ability the lens holds.. actually, you know, I still don't have an explanation for that. Does anyone else? I'd really like to know why the lens is being so limited x__x

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to hellhoundp2k [2005-05-20 16:11:20 +0000 UTC]

Yea, I'm aware of reversal rings. However, I think most people in the club aren't going to go out and buy one. If they're anything like me, the money would be better spent on a case of ramen or paying some bills. hehe. But it would be worth a mention. I'm going to revise it and make corrections soon, so I'll probably put mention about the reversal rings for those who can afford it.

What are you trying to figure out about the lenses?

Admin Tim

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hellhoundp2k In reply to macrophoto [2005-05-20 20:05:32 +0000 UTC]

okie. o__o usually, when you take a lens off a camera, you can use it if you look through it either way as a crazy-ass magnifying glass. Why doesn't that effect teansfer over when it's attached onto the camera, I mean.. why can't we get the same magnification/detail in the viewfinder as we can if we look through the seperate lens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to hellhoundp2k [2005-05-21 15:53:16 +0000 UTC]

it's because of the focus. if you hold the single lens up to your eye, you won't see much, if any, magnification. but when you attach the lens to the end of a telephoto lens, the zoom greatly changes the focus. it has to do with the curvature of the lenses and the distance they are apart. it's all math, but i wouldn't have a clue how to calculate it. check out this: [link] and look where it says 'refracting telescope'. that is the same principal as how the reversed lenses work.

admin tim

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BBCVersus In reply to ??? [2005-05-20 09:46:41 +0000 UTC]

Nice nice nice...great tutorial...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

falka0 [2005-05-20 09:06:39 +0000 UTC]

Admin Tim! Nice dining room and an interesting tutorial

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to falka0 [2005-05-20 16:15:03 +0000 UTC]

Why thanks! It's technically not 'mine' tho. I'm at home for a few weeks before I return to school and move into my apartment. So I'll tell my parents you liked it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

falka0 In reply to macrophoto [2005-05-20 19:18:35 +0000 UTC]

hehe ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ninazdesign [2005-05-20 08:40:17 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting, thanks for shairing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Triagon In reply to ??? [2005-05-20 07:55:05 +0000 UTC]

if someone is interested to make the same thing with a COMPATC CAMERA I have inserted an article in my Journal....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stetre76 In reply to ??? [2005-05-20 05:30:11 +0000 UTC]

well, everybody's talking about "inverted lens" right now - i think i gotta try it as well
like the tutorial - it's easy to understand, to the point and not too long

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CrackedCupcake [2005-05-20 00:02:49 +0000 UTC]

Very well written and understandable! Thank you so much for taking the time to help educate us.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZER0-0NE [2005-05-19 23:49:32 +0000 UTC]

I use this technique... except that i dont tape the two lenses.. hmm never thought of it... better than having to hold the camera with 1 hand, hold the other lens in place with the other hand, trying to focus, and trying to keep still (as i don't have a tripod).

good tutorial for beginners - really well explained and illustrated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

froggynaan In reply to ??? [2005-05-19 23:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for doing the research! I'll use this soon, when my ebay lens comes in the mail

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ElectrikSheep In reply to ??? [2005-05-19 23:33:22 +0000 UTC]

ah! nifty trick!! I've ssen it some forum around the internet but this one is more illustrtive, well done...Mcgyver would be proud!!

Would it work on a non SLR though?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuiGonJediJinn In reply to ElectrikSheep [2005-05-20 03:24:38 +0000 UTC]

actually, that's what u use to do it. i just demonstrated with my SLR because... uhhh... if i had the lens on my digital, i would have a hard time taking a pic of it. hehe but yes, you can do it on digital. just turn your zoom all the way up. the pics of pennies were taken with my digital 10x zoom and the 50mm lens shown. and the microphotos in my gallery were done the same way. good question

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Darkborne In reply to QuiGonJediJinn [2006-02-06 04:04:53 +0000 UTC]

....i never thought of turnng the zoom up to take close ups of things that are already close, but small. *hits self on head.
hah!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuiGonJediJinn In reply to Darkborne [2006-02-07 13:10:34 +0000 UTC]

turning the zoom up has the effect of giving the lens a higher mm rating. for example, zooming on a 55mm lens may turn it into effectively a 200mm lens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Darkborne In reply to QuiGonJediJinn [2006-02-08 09:50:35 +0000 UTC]

right!...i'll have to try it soon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ElectrikSheep In reply to QuiGonJediJinn [2005-05-20 18:24:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh i see!! Thats great news...i gotta go to a second hand shop to get a lens to experiment on, thanks for the tutorial once again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

luneves In reply to ??? [2005-05-19 23:24:52 +0000 UTC]


AWESOME!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KatKongsvengence In reply to ??? [2005-05-19 22:21:13 +0000 UTC]

o, this will be so helpful! thank you...I'm excited to give this one a try

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

foeo In reply to ??? [2005-05-19 22:19:27 +0000 UTC]

Ah, there are still people who know and use this technique. Nice.

But it can be make in a simpler way. Just hold a reversed 50mm to the bajonet. There are even adapters who do this for you, so you can concentrate on focusing. Because it's lighter you don't even need a tripod, except for longer exposures. And yes, you have to make adjustments all by yourself, but thats a good training. Sure, the range ain't as big with just the 50mm, but it ought to be good enouh for starters. And it can be done on the fly, without much tinkering around.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

macrophoto In reply to foeo [2005-05-19 22:37:12 +0000 UTC]

Cool! Thanks for the pointer.

Admin Tim

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>