HOME | DD

Published: 2005-05-19 22:04:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 22049; Favourites: 141; Downloads: 6943
Redirect to original
Description
Researched, written, photographed, and compiled by .Please DO NOT use this tutorial to any other websites. However, feel free to link to it. We appreciate your cooperation!
If you notice any spelling, grammar, or other mistakes, send *QuiGonJediJinn a note and let him know he messed up.
Thanks,
Admin Tim
*QuiGonJediJinn
Related content
Comments: 106
Toothrot [2010-02-11 23:06:33 +0000 UTC]
It might be worth mentioning that you can calculate the magnification by dividing the focal length of the first by the focal length of the second.
So here we would have
125 : 50 = 2,5
^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
UnnoticedBeauty [2010-01-04 00:11:44 +0000 UTC]
Great tutorial! I have been looking into this technique for a while but never fully understood it and was worried about damaging my lenses. Thanks for explaining it so clearly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lataeralia [2008-08-07 09:43:32 +0000 UTC]
does this method work with the nikon cameras? I fear it doesn't but it's so nice...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lepatriinu123 In reply to lataeralia [2008-12-27 16:15:45 +0000 UTC]
I think I should work as long as you use two lenses. The one lens reversed method I saw didn't work on my D40.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lataeralia In reply to Lepatriinu123 [2008-12-28 22:49:40 +0000 UTC]
me too...
thank you so much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PontaFanta [2008-01-16 03:43:31 +0000 UTC]
I can never get it to focus when I even just use one lens with something close-up. I think I may need more practice. Thanks for the tutorial!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HKISGotMilk [2007-05-17 14:40:17 +0000 UTC]
I've got a quick question. Is it possible to change the aperature (to F3.5 or away from it), or are you stuck without any aperature control? I've got a D80 and the stock 18-135. I've also got a reverse lens ring that lets me attach the lens to the camera backwards.
But, the aperature shows up as "F -.-". There's no way to change this, right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to HKISGotMilk [2007-06-10 17:04:48 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm... I'm not the best person to ask. I usually just fiddle with the settings until it looks right. Try posting this question in the club forums or on the DA forums.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
clementchew [2007-03-27 08:13:49 +0000 UTC]
Residue is spelt RESIDUE, not RESEDUE.
Second paragraph of article 1. Required Equipment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to clementchew [2007-03-27 11:26:12 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the catch. But I don't know if I even have the original anymore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SYSPLUCK [2007-03-07 05:10:31 +0000 UTC]
zOMG I just tried, and it, I don't have the best camera, a 6mp Cybershot. but god damn it worked WONDERFULLY!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SYSPLUCK [2007-03-07 04:35:20 +0000 UTC]
Wow! I've never heard of this before! I can't wate to try it out!!
!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WkedAthena [2007-02-25 20:25:40 +0000 UTC]
I had no idea I could do that...
i was looking to buy a Magnifying glass
-- Your tutorial is amazing! Thank you soo much for sharing your knowledge!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to WkedAthena [2007-03-21 03:00:40 +0000 UTC]
No problem! Glad you found it useful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gregery27183 [2006-07-14 14:30:28 +0000 UTC]
AAAW.... I thought I was the first to think of this... guess I was thinking too highly of myself.... I started doing this back in uh... February...
Note: something that can help focus.... if you are taking pictures of things that stay still... make the aperture MUCH smaller than you normally would... or even as small as it can possibly go... this causes a dificulty with lighting... but... even with your very bright light... make the exposure time as high as it needs to be to for the light metering even if its 30 seconds long or longer.... the result is... even if things are not in focus in the viewfinder... they will come out in focus in the picture. some of the pictures I have taken were impossible to get in focus through the viewfinder... but with a small enough aperture and a long enough exposure, things always work out. A tripod or something stable to stand on is a MUST. I have used CD jewl cases and printing/notebook paper to rais and lower the camera and/or subjects.... and rather than pointing the camera down and using height for focus... I used lateral distance. like this
MapKey:
camera with modifying second lens " II= " tiny spider in home/vial " m " books/CD cases/paper " E "
II= m
EEEE EEE
Product: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gregery27183 [2006-07-14 14:29:47 +0000 UTC]
AAAW.... I thought I was the first to think of this... guess I was thinking too highly of myself.... I started doing this back in uh... February...
Note: something that can help focus.... if you are taking pictures of things that stay still... make the aperture MUCH smaller than you normally would... or even as small as it can possibly go... this causes a dificulty with lighting... but... even with your very bright light... make the exposure time as high as it needs to be to for the light metering even if its 30 seconds long or longer.... the result is... even if things are not in focus in the viewfinder... they will come out in focus in the picture. some of the pictures I have taken were impossible to get in focus through the viewfinder... but with a small enough aperture and a long enough exposure, things always work out. A tripod or something stable to stand on is a MUST. I have used CD jewl cases and printing/notebook paper to rais and lower the camera and/or subjects.... and rather than pointing the camera down and using height for focus... I used lateral distance. like this
MapKey:
camera with modifying second lens " II= " tiny spider in home/vial " m " books/CD cases/paper " E "
II= m
EEEE EEE
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Neo3004 In reply to Sadalmelik [2006-04-22 20:45:24 +0000 UTC]
It works well on compact cams too.
In fact, first time I heard of this was by people using compact (Powershot A serie of Canon).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
D-Me [2006-03-10 13:24:26 +0000 UTC]
great tutorial
i use something similar: i hold the front end of a 135 mm lens on the front end of my fujifilm s5600.
max zoom, macro mod and that is it.
only problem is the narrow DOF
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BiNeon [2006-03-09 02:40:04 +0000 UTC]
With my Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L and my Canon EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 it would not be possible to do this correct?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to BiNeon [2006-03-09 20:21:25 +0000 UTC]
i have no clue. i don't know what all those numbers mean. just try it and see how it looks. practice makes perfect.
-Admin Tim
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MindFlesh In reply to macrophoto [2006-06-27 21:59:28 +0000 UTC]
Hi Admin Tim
The numbers are just what kinds of lenses (s)he has. They just want to know if the technique would work with those two types of lenses. They're both from Canon. The first one is a [70-200mm Telephoto lens] and the second one is a [18-55mm Super Wide Angle lens].
Hope that helps some.
Much Aloha,
Leialoha
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
webworm [2006-03-07 10:52:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much for this clear tutorial!!! Very useful!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to webworm [2006-03-07 14:06:41 +0000 UTC]
no problem! i hope it helps.
-Admin Tim
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
QNetX [2006-03-07 04:32:33 +0000 UTC]
If you use this technique often and don't want to deal with the tape, a cleaner solution is to obtain a Macro coupler or reverse ring (doubly threaded male ring). Basically it is a filter ring that screws into the filter threads of each lens thereby connecting them together.
Here is an article that describes it and the technique: [link]
Entering "Macro Reversing Ring" in google led me to a site that sells them [link] .
GQ
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to QNetX [2006-03-07 04:37:15 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I was informed about those after I made the tutorial and never got around to updating it. Plus, I'm a starving college student, so I could either buy a reversal ring or eat for a week... hmmm....
-Admin Tim
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
inkmadetears [2006-03-07 03:44:43 +0000 UTC]
this is one of the best tutorials i have ever seen!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to inkmadetears [2006-03-07 04:26:44 +0000 UTC]
why thank you! i hope you enter the current microphotography contest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
inkmadetears In reply to macrophoto [2006-03-07 04:32:08 +0000 UTC]
im thinking i prolly will.
yeah prolly.
haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JimField [2006-03-06 20:40:34 +0000 UTC]
I have always wondered how the reverse lens effect works, and this guide is a very nice step by step guide, thanks a lot for this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to JimField [2006-03-07 01:54:27 +0000 UTC]
no problem! if you take any pics, let me know. i'd like to see!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JimField In reply to macrophoto [2006-03-07 01:57:22 +0000 UTC]
Will do great tutorial I have done my first one very basic but it is quite nice take a gander in my gallery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wowhaxer [2006-02-28 03:28:47 +0000 UTC]
thanks so much for this tutorial. It is amazing the stuff I can photograph now since I have a 200mm tele. taking pics like through a microscope is awsome!!! Thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to wowhaxer [2006-02-28 14:49:09 +0000 UTC]
i'd like to see some of your attempts! note me when you have some stuff up.
-admin tim
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dunadan-from-Bag-End [2006-02-09 22:58:45 +0000 UTC]
And what about vignietting? I am using a bit other method but the idea is the same - however my zoom and standart lens have different apertures...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to Dunadan-from-Bag-End [2006-02-14 13:19:06 +0000 UTC]
if the difference between the two lenses isn't great enough, you'll see the vignetting. it's not as much about the aperature as the difference in the lenses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
naiveamoeba [2006-01-04 22:26:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the tutorial. It seems to come out as a tiny little vignetted circle for me though.. hmmm...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to naiveamoeba [2006-01-06 20:20:10 +0000 UTC]
you need to have a larger difference in the lenses. see if you can find a lens that has a greater magnification for the base lens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
naiveamoeba In reply to macrophoto [2006-01-06 23:29:19 +0000 UTC]
hmm, I have a 28mm-100mm and a 70mm-300mm lens, what'd be the best combo? or do zooms not really work?
ta for the help.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
macrophoto In reply to naiveamoeba [2006-01-07 04:32:19 +0000 UTC]
zoom is good. you want the lens with the highest zoom zoomed in all the way and mounted to the camera normally. then take the lens with the least zoom and reverse it and put it on the end of the zoom lens. so basically, you want to have the main lens at 300mm and the reversed one at 28.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
naiveamoeba In reply to macrophoto [2006-01-07 21:24:37 +0000 UTC]
Ah, right. I'll try that then. thanks a lot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Daniel-20 [2005-12-06 12:57:57 +0000 UTC]
WOWOWOWOWOO!!! cool tut!
just tried it and love it...
i already heard of an retro atapter, so you can mount one objective reverse to the cam-body... but this is simply freakin!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>