HOME | DD

markdow — Quail chick, MRI by

Published: 2006-11-20 08:33:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 11151; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 7382
Redirect to original
Description Quail chick, volume rendered from MRI data.
(stereo pair, cross view)

Coturnix japonicus, embryonic age 10 days, ex ovo

Raw volume data available from Caltech Atlas of Quail Development
(data © California Institute of Technology, Pasadena)

Review article about the data: Digital Three-Dimensional Atlas of Quail Development Using High-Resolution MRI

Download for 1300 x 1300 version.

Modeled and rendered with Space Software .

Photos of quail chicks .


----------------------
There are no restrictions on use of this image. Claiming to be the originator or owner, explicitly or implicitly, is bad karma . A link (if appropriate), a note to markdow30@gmail.com, and credit are appreciated but not required.
Related content
Comments: 16

phraught [2018-07-09 20:10:01 +0000 UTC]

Wow - very cool - great 3-D.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kookro [2006-11-24 01:51:33 +0000 UTC]

woah... looks cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

von-lazuli [2006-11-21 01:16:36 +0000 UTC]

Wow... oh so creepy...

Beautiful model.

Thought about texturing it? or would that ruin the effect?

Laz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markdow In reply to von-lazuli [2006-11-21 05:52:15 +0000 UTC]

Well, it's not so much a model as the real thing; the surface is modeled on the fly. In principle it could be texture mapped, but there aren't good tools -- it would be laborious to assign every surface patch (~1/4 x number of pixels) a texture.

It would be nice to more simply color code by region. For example to highlight the feather bumps, eyes, etc.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saruman-23 [2006-11-20 21:30:32 +0000 UTC]

i've just gone and given this a second look, after your comment (to show my girlfriend the image). it's breathtaking, a definite fav+ on sheer aceness

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saruman-23 [2006-11-20 16:18:38 +0000 UTC]

weird, very cool but very weird.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markdow In reply to saruman-23 [2006-11-20 17:19:42 +0000 UTC]

This is done from volumetric data. You should see the inside!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saruman-23 In reply to markdow [2006-11-20 21:28:20 +0000 UTC]

aye, i read that it was volumetric... how do you come about the data?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markdow In reply to saruman-23 [2006-11-20 21:36:52 +0000 UTC]

I added a link to the source for the raw data in "artist's comments"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saruman-23 In reply to markdow [2006-11-21 19:06:14 +0000 UTC]

ah. so you did - thanks for pointing that out

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RUN415 [2006-11-20 11:57:13 +0000 UTC]

This is bizarre...creepy even
Reminds me of H R Giger.
Quite fascinating.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

markdow In reply to RUN415 [2008-07-11 17:59:54 +0000 UTC]

Here's a little blurb about how Giger might have been influenced by Haekel's drawings of echinoderms: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

markdow In reply to RUN415 [2006-11-20 17:18:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes, these have a weird and creepy first impression. But once you get past that first bite of a chicken wing, they start looking just plain wonderful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RUN415 In reply to markdow [2006-11-21 09:44:37 +0000 UTC]

Yeah...hee...the more I see this image...the more I like it.
Art?
You can't beat Mother Nature.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markdow In reply to RUN415 [2006-11-21 15:05:37 +0000 UTC]

Yea, she's hot. When I look at this, the data, I think about how this happened in 10 days (after fertalization of the egg cell).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dovel100 In reply to markdow [2008-01-10 23:15:16 +0000 UTC]

Wow. After ten days how big is it?
Anyway very cool stereo image. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0