HOME | DD

markstewart — Vestal tuccia with sieve copy

Published: 2011-11-12 12:00:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 1136; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Egg tempera and oil on board. I saw the original by Mantegna in the National Gallery in London and it became one of my fav classical paintings. I studied how it was created and tried to use the same technique, I did not follow the original to strictly as i was more interested in the technique of the old master. Layers of white tempera built up separated by oil washes, this addad depth and tone using the white only. I used about 6 layers, not nearly enough to produce the fabulous effect of the original. Tuccia was one of the vestal virgins and when her chastity was questioned she proved her innocence by carrying a sieve of water from the Tiber to the temple of Vesta. Original painted in circa 1495 [link]
Related content
Comments: 41

crayonmaniac [2012-05-06 12:27:18 +0000 UTC]

omg this is beautiful, why did i never see that one, well done mark

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to crayonmaniac [2012-05-07 10:07:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, it's an old student piece and i sort of messed up her face but i have wanted to develop this with another piece and your photo is perfect for that. I'm glad you like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crayonmaniac In reply to markstewart [2012-05-07 10:16:01 +0000 UTC]

did you see that i kinda adapted it to give you 2 views, now you can chose, waw it will be great when you that again, i cannot wait

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

photospider [2011-12-09 07:26:05 +0000 UTC]

Interesting!And beautiful...
I try something similar, but with "sepia watercolour"
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alsdale [2011-11-15 20:12:09 +0000 UTC]

This is stunning. I'm a big fan of your portraits, but it's always nice to see something a little different. As usual, your incredible mastery of art comes shining through! And I love that you stuck to the original technique

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Alsdale [2011-11-16 19:52:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, i have been very obsessed with pencil portraiture this year. I dusted off my paints but had to dispose of them due to their age (hardened) . Once i can afford to replace them i shall crack on and try other projects. I appreciate your kind comment, it means a lot, thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkallegiance666 [2011-11-15 11:41:55 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful work!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to darkallegiance666 [2011-11-16 19:48:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Comicalfreakazoid [2011-11-14 18:40:31 +0000 UTC]

oh very beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Comicalfreakazoid [2011-11-16 19:48:09 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pbird12 [2011-11-13 09:44:44 +0000 UTC]

Oh wow Mark , it looks fantastic! Is it awful that I prefer yours to the original

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to pbird12 [2011-11-14 15:05:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and no it's not awful at all. I'm extremely flattered

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JustABeautifulDream [2011-11-13 08:34:55 +0000 UTC]

This looks terrific, I have never seen this technique before.
You created such a great 3D-effect, especially on the upper part. It really seems to get out of the paper and doesn't look drawn on it at all. And also the clothes are brilliant. All these folds.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to JustABeautifulDream [2011-11-14 15:04:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, it was fun to do

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Antionne [2011-11-13 04:55:29 +0000 UTC]

excuse my french but FUCKING EXCELLENT!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Antionne [2011-11-14 15:03:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, i appreciate that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Haydaad [2011-11-12 22:52:10 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful job! I love the contrasts between light and shadow. Thanks for sharing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Haydaad [2011-11-14 15:03:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NanaCasas [2011-11-12 20:11:47 +0000 UTC]

As always, lovely work! I don't know that I'd have the patience to try this technique. Thank you for sharing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to NanaCasas [2011-11-14 15:02:49 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and you're welcome I'm thinking of trying something like it in acrylic, that should speed up the process considerably

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NanaCasas In reply to markstewart [2011-11-14 16:58:04 +0000 UTC]

If you do try it in acrylic, be sure to show us the result and/or your process. I would love to see what you come up with! :0)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to NanaCasas [2011-11-14 17:24:50 +0000 UTC]

Will do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NanaCasas In reply to markstewart [2011-11-14 18:43:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you friend! :0) Appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kwalden [2011-11-12 17:31:48 +0000 UTC]

I've never heard of this technique, but I haven't been in art that long. This is exquisitely done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to kwalden [2011-11-14 15:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, it was a fun exercise

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScionicSpectre [2011-11-12 16:54:48 +0000 UTC]

Wow. There is still quite a bit of detail here, and the style is pretty expressive. I'd say you did pretty well, considering what you had to work with.

The only criticisms I would have, which you're probably aware of, are perhaps developing the face a bit further, and sending the right leg back (the robe could be a bit darker in this area, but this may be due to the lighting in the room or the camera used). Of course, this would take quite a bit of reworking, and considering the medium you were using, you've done very well.

That said, there are some things I personally like better about this than the original- the folds look more accentuated in certain areas, which makes it look a bit more three-dimensional. As someone else pointed out, the whole piece looks a bit more like a sculpture, including the background. I'd say you've almost instantly learned this technique to proficiency.

Hah, you didn't ask for a critique, and I don't have the special account that would let me do one, but I hope you take my honest feedback as a sign of my respect for your work. You're courageous enough to try to emulate a master's style and I think you've made it your own in the process. There are many people in the world who never reach this level of mastery in their own trade, and that is the gift that art bestows upon us. It keeps giving, expressing itself well beyond the effort we put into it. And, well, it's fun.

So thanks for continuing to show us this work- I feel like I should be paying just to see these. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to ScionicSpectre [2011-11-14 14:59:43 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your words, i appreciate them .. and if you feel like paying to view them then hey who am i to complain One look through my gallery and it soon becomes apparent that there are no paintings of faces or figures apart from this one. I must admit to being utterly awful at rendering them with brush or colour. This piece does have the most awful face I am thinking of trying pastels next year as they are as close to pencil as i can get, and there are many on DA who can assist my learning. Maybe i will find success there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ScionicSpectre In reply to markstewart [2011-11-14 18:15:38 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's basically like graphite, so if you're decent with that you should feel right at home with pastels.

It's easy to overshoot the values in faces with paint- my faces still tend to look fairly geometric when I paint (I've only been painting seriously for about two months). But I'd say you did really well, considering- what dimensions were you working with, if I may ask?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to ScionicSpectre [2011-11-14 18:19:03 +0000 UTC]

72cm-22cm

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Annezon [2011-11-12 15:20:51 +0000 UTC]

This is just beautiful You did such a wonderful job. And what a great idea to replicate the painting technique Just simply gorgeous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Annezon [2011-11-14 14:48:34 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, it was an interesting exercise which left me with so much more respect for the old masters art. Not exactly a copy but it was a cool technique to try out

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Annezon In reply to markstewart [2011-11-16 22:00:55 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful work and very inspiring (and I'm not being sappy). I feel like I've rediscovered art after a really long absence, so anytime I see something like this, my first thought is "what a great idea". And it doesn't hurt that it turned out so gorgeous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Annezon [2011-11-18 00:23:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fighterrr [2011-11-12 13:23:20 +0000 UTC]

exellent workn

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Fighterrr [2011-11-14 14:45:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fighterrr In reply to markstewart [2011-11-14 16:14:07 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

akamelya [2011-11-12 12:47:15 +0000 UTC]

excellent work! it like a sculpture

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to akamelya [2011-11-14 14:45:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, yes .. the original was to look like a frieze or carving in stone or marble

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

akamelya In reply to markstewart [2011-11-15 21:21:04 +0000 UTC]

This shows that the quality of work you did in the technique

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Prasad-Natarajan [2011-11-12 12:26:31 +0000 UTC]

classical work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

markstewart In reply to Prasad-Natarajan [2011-11-14 14:43:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0