HOME | DD
Mikeinel — Lame Comic 10
Published: 2010-02-26 15:54:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 133352; Favourites: 3111; Downloads: 1167
Redirect to original
Description
Collection: [link]9: [link]
8: [link]
7: [link]
6: [link]
5: [link]
4: [link]
3: [link]
2: [link]
1: [link]
Related content
Comments: 677
As an owner of huge (ok, maybe not THAT big) jugs, I can say: Yes. Back pain is common.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jajajajajajajajaja! I Like the Style of drawing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
... i donth think basketbals have the same mass density like breast but shure guy keep going
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They do... they really do.... I'm a DD cup, and I have chronic back pain...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ups...didnt meant as a reply XD just wanted a reguaar comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... i donth think basketbals have the same mass density like breast but shure guy keep going
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Im an A cup, I dont have to worry about that answer
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That's why you need a guy who will help you carry them around:3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i can answer that for everyone....
YES!!! YES THEY DO!!!!!!!!DX
^w^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
According to my sister, who has DDD's, yes.
I still want bigger tits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If my knowlage of the anatomy is correct they don't. Pregnent women carry far greater ammounts of weight then boobs do and boobs are supported by muscle groupes in the back where as pregnant bellies have verry little supporting them. So boobs really don't cause back pain. Unless the woman has a missfitted bra.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Experience > theoretical knowledge?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And do you know what it feels like to have abnormally large boobs? Most women in the united states have misfitted bras because they are unwilling to properly measure them selves or let them selves be measured by some one else. That is the predominant cause of female back pain in this country according to Chiropractors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Indeed I do, and that's why I'm telling you otherwise. D: And I've been measured by professionals multiple times, so I know I've got the right size.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your not flat but by no means do you have particularly large breasts. I know three women who have obviously larger chests then you, one of them even has implants, and never have I heard a one of them complain about back pain. On the contrary I hear most ever guy I know talk about back pain every now and again. You just have a bad back.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have no pictures of me on the internet that aren't photoshopped to make them smaller, so I don't know how you'd know that. Furthermore, implants are not the real thing so I don't think they could be compared to this. And it's not just myself I am speaking for. I know others who are bigger than myself and some (not all) do also complain of back pains.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Who do you think your foolin by the way. 1 why on earth would a girl maker her self look like she has slightly smaller breasts? In a world where it's seen as a good thing to be well endowed, why would someone waste their time makeing them seem smaller.
2 Your pics are obviously not photoshopped. If you had the skills to photoshop your pics to be indecernable from real life then your gallery would be full of photoshopped pics not cell shaded pics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I know you wrote this comment a while ago, and I'm by no means trying to reenter an argument or start one, but I just wanted to comment..
I don't have small breasts, but I don't have 'big' breasts either (well I don't consider them big), but I very much would love to have small tits. A little bigger than flat would be my dream size.
So, I just wanted to point out.. everyone has different sexual interests, because I know plenty of people who aren't attracted to large breasts. I personally am attracted to both large and small sizes, but I know when I hang out with my friends, most of the people attracted to females that I know complain about breasts that are even slightly large.
I'll have a picture of a girl with C's or D's, and they'll say, "she has a pretty face, but her breasts are too big".
I just wanted to point out that everyone's tastes vary. I am not trying to rehash this old argument (I honestly don't support either side), I just thought.. I want to share my knowledge with you! And sharing is caring. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know a woman who used to want to be flat as a board. She had a friend like that and thought that that was the epitome of beauty. She however grew out of that. The face of beauty is ever changing, you may to come to want larger breasts with time, but maybe not.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah yes, many people go through phases, I do love going through phases on certain things (fashion usually), but, I have wanted small breasts for a long time, and I don't think it's going to change. But, my love for seeing small breasts as beautiful might (I don't know for sure), be because I grew up in a childhood where I saw a lot of beautiful art, all with beautiful women with small breasts. Who knows who knows.
Some things, you just know you will always feel, like how I know I will always love soup, or how I know my fiance will always love getting his ass played with. Ah, this is my belief anyways, I know everyone's perspective on life differs, and I know I personally see too much permanence in life, but I can't help it.
Yes, I agree, the face of beauty is always changing, thank god! I'm sort of hoping when I grow old and wrinkly something in my brain will 'click' and I will think that wrinkles are the sexiest feature ever. >w<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I really didn't need to know that about your fiance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maa, as an answer to your questions, women are pressured to have larger breasts because it -is- seen as attractive, as you have pointed out. However, not all of us want that sort of attention, especially those of us not interested in sex or anything related to it.
Furthermore, I can assure you every single one of my pictures is pretty heavily photoshopped. Anyone who uses photoshop frequently could point out that I like the liquify tool a little too much. Do you really thing women just look like that naturally? My neck is too long for a normal human in many of those pictures, my arms are too thin and are of various widths because I'm not consistent in how much is shrink them, and my waist and legs are the same way. Furthermore, you can see how warped the scenery is around the places I edit because the liquify tools pulls at them as well as me. Honestly, they're not even /good/ photoshops, haha. I don't photoshop pictures of me as a major part of my gallery because I don't feel the need to and I'm -not- very good at it. I like making and posing 3D models (which I assume is what you're referring to when you say "cell shaded pics," as there aren't many actual cell shaded pictures in my gallery), so that's what I do. But this has nothing to do with our conversation.
I did not know implants were heavier than the real thing, as I've never had experience with them. I'm also not sure who Sheila Hershy is, as I don't pay attention to any sort of celebrities really. And, as I said, not all of my big busted friends complain of pain, and even among the ones who do I wouldn't say are in anything near excruciating pain, and nor am I, haha. I'm sure you've experienced back pain before, even if from something unrelated. It's usually a mild, dull feeling - and that's the kind of pain this brings. Heck, insurances even cover reduction surgery for this very reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sheyla Hershey has 34 tripple F breast implants. AKA each breast is 1 and a half times the size of her head.
I don't care if you use the liquify tool to much. That has nothing to do with your real life phosts. If you were really good enough to make a picture look that convinceing then you wouldn't use the liquify tool so much, and you wouldn't use computer generated pics as you primary Submitions. You'd take real life photos and you'd photoshop them.
Of course your one of the only people in the world who would photoshop them selves less societally beautiful. You suck at lying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You're mistaken; what I'm telling you is they're not very convincing when you know the program. If you're familiar with the tools, you can easily point out which ones I used where. Photoshop is an extremely easy program to use. It's not that difficult to make things "convincing," as you say, to the untrained eye. Furthermore, what I'm good at and what I choose to do do not need to correlate. That's like saying if you're good at gymnastics but you like baseball better you'd be doing gymnastics for fun instead of baseball. That's irrational; it makes absolutely no sense.
Also, not all humans think large busts are attractive on women. For just one instance out of many, in Japan there's a stigma of the larger the breasts, the smaller the brain. Don't mistake your values with those of everyone's.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ummm... That stigma is kind of everywhere, in every country, in every form of Media. And of course not everyone thinks that large breasts are beautiful, but most do. In society as it is now large breasts are most often seen as the number one most important feature. Just looks at some women who are famous actresses and are considered "Hot". Often times they have simply "off" faces but large breasts, and they are considered "Hot" because of it. It doesn't matter how messed up their face is.
To say that you photoshoped your pics to have smaller breasts is akin to saying you want society to see you as less beautiful. Something no girl I have ever known would even consider for a seccond. Honestly it's pathetic, but it's the law of the gender.
In the end you couldn't be more obviously a liar because in every instance where I have put you in a corner with evidence in this argument you mearly say that you have the exact trait, tallent, experiance that would flaw my argument, then you present no proof what so ever of the validity of your argument.
As a pre-med student (though not going into chiropractology) my understanding is that breasts do not cause back pain. Either you have a naturally bad back, your bra is miss fitted, or you are a flat out liar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
See, this is where I must disagree. Your entire premise is incorrect. You cannot simply say that most people think large breasts are so beautiful they trump even an "off" face, no matter how messed up it is. As a pre-med student, you should have taken at least an introduction to psychology class (and even if you have not, it's something you can google). Surely then you should have learned about even the basics of human attraction. The only thing universal about it, the only thing you can say applies to "most" people, are ratios. An attractive face is just as important as a balanced body ratio, as it tells the suitor that the individual is healthy and viable. An unbalanced body - large breasts with a less-than-average face for example - is not naturally seen as attractive to "most," as it should alert the viewer that something is wrong with their genes - perhaps they were terribly ill when they were little, perhaps their gene-pool is not very diverse, and etc. It (that is, finding large breasts inherently attractive) is a trait that can be easily learned through conditioning, however, even then most people would think the person with proportional ratios is much more attractive.
Having addressed that, I think you can see how your assumption that me "[photoshopping my breasts smaller makes me seem like I want society to view me as less attractive]" is invalid. Based on ratios scientifically proven to be attractive to most humans, simply making one's breasts smaller would not necessarily make one less attractive if it makes the bust-waist-hip ratio closer to the ideal. The reason it is seen as so naturally attractive is because it directly correlates to female fertility.
I fail to see a time when you have put me in a corner. I'm not even quite sure what you mean with this statement, as, as far as I knew, we were simply having a conversation; not trying to put one another in "corners," haha. That wouldn't do either of us any good. We are simply trying to convince the other of our views based on facts, are we not? I assure you, I have not once tried to convince you of any lie, as that would be counter-productive to this aim. If anything at all, it is you who has been beating around points I try to make, going off on tangents and dropping them once you see how illogical your responses are (for example, how you said if I was so good at photoshopping my gallery, necessarily, would be full of photoshopped pictures; however this has nothing to do with our discussion). The reason you may feel that I have the "exact trait, talent, experience," etc. to counter your arguments is because, well, the reason I spoke up in the first place is because I have first-hand knowledge on the subject. Perhaps it is not me whose argument is invalid, but yours. If not, do tell me where I have proposed anything that can be disproved. I can just as easily call you a liar as you have called me. That solves nothing; gets us nowhere.
To bring us back, I am trying to convince you that large breasts can indeed cause back pain, regardless of whether one's bra is misfitted, as you believe is impossible, and have stated why I believe so. You, however, have merely stated a few cases in which women have abnormally large breasts and do not feel back pain. I do not deny that these women exist, and never have. What you need to prove to me, based on your original argument that it is impossible for breasts to cause back pain, is that there is no single woman who ever walked this earth who has had back pain because of her breasts even though she had a properly fitted bra and does not simply have a "bad back." Surely of all the women in the world who complain of back pain due to their breasts, you cannot simply write all of them off as having "bad backs," - unless perhaps it is their breasts that gave them a bad back, thus causing their back pains. But even so, this generalization is a pretty weak argument, don't you agree? Honestly, you've got the more difficult role in this because a long as there is a single woman who does not have bra issues and has an average or better back but still experiences pain caused by her large breasts, you will always be wrong. Getting to the root of the problem, your claim is something that is -impossible- to prove, simply because you cannot tell someone s/he is not in pain. This is simple logic, I hope you can recognize, and has nothing to do with whether or not you think I am a liar.
Now then, feel free to disprove this with your own logic or scientific facts. And no, "You are a liar," does not count as a fact. Or logic. Well, not logical logic anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Human attraction may be a physical reaction, but the Ideal of beauty has changed over the generations, and is in my opinion proven to be as much environemntal as it is genetic. There was a time where obesity was considered the epitome of beauty, because it showed that one was provided well for.
If most are unwilling to over look a large bust if the face is poor then why are Christina Hendrix, and Anjalina Jolie famous?
Well the first thing I said was why boobs don't hurt ones back, your response to that was "Nuhun, yes they do". They I said how would you know, you said "I have large breasts". I said no you don't, you said "I Photoshop". I said no one would do that, you said "I do because I don't want to be pigionholed". I said you had neither the skill nor does any girl want to decrease the percieved "attractiveness", you said "I do, and I do". Mind you all my reasons were more thoughtout and yours I simply shortened.
Also I had a few friends of mine who are far more proficient at photoshop then I am. AKA going to college for graphic design and have taken a several photoshop classes. They agree with me. Your pics of your self aren't photoshoped.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
See, that's just it - the ideal of beauty has /not/ changed. Going back to those ratios I was talking about, they've been the same for centuries - including right now - and have been tested across many cultures and still the ideal ratios remain constant. Your opinions don't mean much when scientific fact proves them wrong. According to how ratios work, which perhaps I wrongly assumed you were familiar with, obesity has nothing to do with it - if the ratios are in proportion one can be as fat or as skinny as one wants, within reason, and still be considered attractive. Just look at the ideals of beauty across times - Marylin Monroe, the Venus de Milo, and Jessica Alba, for example - they all have ratios right around the ideal, are all of varying weights, and all were seen as models for attractiveness. And it goes even further than just body types, but there are also ratios for face proportions and leg length and etc. These haven't changed because they are things that represent health and are ingrained in our DNA for the survival of our species.
And once again, I do not follow celebrities, so I'm unsure who this Christina Hendrix person is. However, from what I've seen of Anjalina Jolie, her face isn't ugly, and her breasts aren't that big. Perhaps she's famous as an actress because, I don't know, maybe she can act? And once again, you cite two examples as if they apply to everyone. There are plenty of actresses who have nice faces but are very small in the chest area, and are just as famous if not moreso.
I don't think you realize how quotes work. You use them when you quote someone. I've never said "nuhun, yes they do," and etc., so I'm not sure who you've been arguing with up until this point. But, ignoring that, just because I have answers to your responses does not make me a liar, and you assuming so only makes you seem close-minded. I assure you, every recent picture of myself I have ever posted on this website has been extensively photoshoped. If you and your friends can't see that, then I suppose it only proves how good the program is. A toddler could use it and do the same things I've done. But even then if you still won't believe what lies right in front of your face, it's irrelevant to the argument as there are many other examples.
And you still have yet to offer any conclusive evidence for your argument. You can site person-by-person examples all day, but it cannot stand as proof that they apply to everyone. Perhaps, as you like to point out that women who have back pain from their breasts have bad backs, the few women you've cited simply have "good backs." You can't write every single person off based on a few examples.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
God would you stop with the wall of text award status walls of text. Do you have any idea how hard that is to read. My medical texts are broken up better.
You know what it doesn't matter. I'm not going to resond to you anymore. You an obvious liar, or compleetly deluded. Either way.
Though I know this wont work. I will give one last attempt to make you see reason. A pregnant woman carries far more weight then breasts do. No only is their fat in the belly but there is bone and a great deal of fluid. The stomach is also unsupported by the muscle groups that support breasts, and it just hangs on the spine. Now I've heard most women complain about their feet when pregnant, but not their back.
Breasts Don't Hurt Backs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have trouble reading? Seriously? They're not that long; I'd expect someone to show a little respect for the efforts being put into this conversation. I;m only trying to help you stop spouting nonsense.
We are not talking about pregnancy here. Once again, you're citing something related as if it correlates. The weight from pregnancy is in a completely different area of the body, is only there for a short period of time, and is surrounded by a whole mess of other circumstances. If you refuse to see what truth lies before you, then, well, there's not much I can do for such a close-minded person. I'm afraid it is you who is deluded, and I apologize for not being able to convince you otherwise. However, as I have said, your claim is irrational, illogical, and just plain absurd, and you have yet to cite a single relevant piece of information toward your argument. Thus, I remain unconvinced. It's been fun chatting with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The pregnant belly is attached to the same part of the anatomy that breasts are, they aren't however attached to the same muscle groups.
And yes your walls of text are problematic because they make the reading difficult to follow. I often ended up reading the same sentances twice and skipping others.
All that being said, your a liar and and Idiot and I'm done with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Implants are much heavier then real breasts. Ever notice how there are some women who go overboard with the Implants and keep going? Like Sheila Hershy. You think that if normal breasts hurt your back, then having an 80 pound pair would make someone think twice before they went even biger. But no. They keep going. By your logic shouldn't the women be in excrutiating pain 100% of the time, why would they keep going bigger?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
girls with smaller breasts wish the had bigger ones and girls with bigger ones wish they had smaller ones :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And guys wish they had any... I'm not talking about myself... eh... no, really.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>