HOME | DD

mikepacker — Kali

Published: 2013-01-05 23:12:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 26317; Favourites: 206; Downloads: 273
Redirect to original
Description A client of mine wanted modernised representations of classic Indian Gods. This one is Kali.

Painting from scratch in Photoshop. Reference was taken for the clothing, jewellery and weaponry.

Approx 10-12 hours to paint.

:thumb346926792:
Related content
Comments: 34

eatme2 [2020-11-17 04:36:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

Anthunus In reply to eatme2 [2021-03-09 16:43:18 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

eatme2 In reply to Anthunus [2021-03-10 03:45:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Serpentgold [2020-10-23 18:31:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Anthunus In reply to Serpentgold [2021-03-09 16:44:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Anthunus [2020-09-28 21:04:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

holdurcum4me [2019-07-03 18:37:01 +0000 UTC]

thats a super hot sexy avatar of Kali ... i wanna c2c for her PM me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ravimishra085 [2018-09-08 07:25:55 +0000 UTC]

 My question to the SO CALLED MODERN artist community...?
hello sir.
their is something about the art i would like to say . The artist are just trying to show the image off maa kali who is preserver of innocent (or destroyer of evil its your choice of what to use)in her fierce rage but what i want to say is you missed one thing .

the artist mixed "pauranik maa kali" (from durga shapshati written in 7 century BCE) with "trinatri maa kali " (from ling puran the 6th puran in all puran) .

their are 4 different avatars of maa kali

which differ in physical appearance and iconography . the artist mixed the two of them here .

1.) The "Pauranik Maa kali " ( the name is given in kalika puran "section kali ka arth tatva") who appeared from the forehead of maa durga . her physical form as described in "durga shaptashati and devi bhagwatam" states that "SHE IS WEARING A SARI OF CHEETA SKIN", has a schackel in her hand as weapon, her tongue is looling out she has sunken eyes , and very long hair covering all around her ad she is wearing a garland of human heads (51 to be exact) . (THE ARTIST used "the sachakle" and her looling "red tongue" and long hair ) THIS AVATAR OF MAA ADI-KALI STANDS FOR AS A "PRESERVER OF INNOCENT"

and 2.)  the "Trinatra maa kali " (section LING PURAN SECTION -"shiva tandava vernan") this is who appeared form the third eye of bhagwan shiva , she is a spiritual part of maa parvati who just jot mixed with the "karal vish" present in shivas throat and emerged out from lord shivas third eye . SHE has two hands has Three Eyes on her forehead like bhagwan shiva., SHE IS WEARING A DEVINE DRESS, has a trishul in her hand , a crown of chandrama (moon just like lord shiva) and she has a sign of karal vish on her neck .and is wearing all different kinds of jewelry. her tongue is NOT LOLLING OUT NETHER SHE is wearing the garland of human skulls . she is dressed as a goddesses. (THE ARTIST used "the third eye" from here and "the trishul" and the chandrama crown) (AND THIS IS WHY IT IS SAID THAT MAA KALI IS THE AVTAR OF MAA PARVATI AND MAA DURGA. YOU ARE REFERRING TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT EVENTS HERE. )

Well this avtar of maa kali  was requested to end demon daruk . but it is said in purans that all the world feared her seeing her rage after she ended demon daruk . and they asked bhagwan shiva to calm her down. bhagwan shiva knew that the fear of gods is just misplaced and to show that maa kali can never harm any innocent one he transformed into a helpless baby (this is called as "batuk avtar") and started crying while lying on ground . as soon as maa kali herd a cry of an innocent child she immediately find the child and start nurturing her out of motherly love. So THIS AVATAR OF MAA KALI STANDS FOR MOTHERLY INSTINCT. and this is how bhagwan shiva clearly showed the gods that maa kali "CARED" more for that helpless child than she cared for destroying demons.

AND FOR THE RECORD THE COMMON FORM WHERE SHIVA LYING BELOW HER FEET - THEIR ALSO SHIVA KNEW THAT THE FEAR OF GODS IS POINTLESS THATS WHY HE DID'NT STOP HER JUST LIED OF THE GROUND "PRESENTING HIMSELF AS A " LINE" BETWEEN PRESERVING INNOCENT & DESTROYING EVIL" - MAA KALI "NEVER, NEVER" CROSSED THAT LINE . BECAUSE SHE KNEW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRESERVING INNOCENT & DESTROYING EVIL... SHE IS OUR PROTECTOR .
                                                                                                                            
NOW I STATE FOR THE IDEA OF "THIRST FOR BLOOD". DEAR ALL REMEMBER MAA KALI AND MAA DUGA WERE FIGHTING DEMONS LONG BEFORE THE ARRIVAL OF "DEMON RAKTBEEJ " AND AS IT PROVED HARD FOR MAA DURGA TO KILL RAKTBEEJ SHE ASKED THE HELP OF MAA KALI AND ON HER ORDERS (MAA DURGA IS THE GENERAL OF THE ARMY) TO CONTAIN ALL THE BLOOD OF RAKTBEEJ IN HER MOUTH. USING HER TONGUE AS WEAPON (LIKE THE NAILS OF BHAGWAN NARSINGH" OR THE THIRD EYE OF SHIVA) AND FOLLOWING ORDERS OF MAA DURGA SHE STOPPED RAKTBEEJ RE-ORIGINATION, AND SO MAA DURGA KILLED RAKTBEEJ (REF - DURGA SAPTASHATI CHAPTER 4 SECTION 8 - "RAKTBEEJ WADH" )

AND you Also missed the concept that she is the mother of all creation . all motherhood feeling comes from her.
EVERY MOTHER IN THE WORLD IS AN INCARNATION OF HER. EVERY MOTHER SHE STANDS FOR HER AND IN EVERY MOTHER SHE STANDS WITH US .
                                                                                                                                

 WHY I DESCRIBED THIS ???????

may be you feel that what i have stated is just same or may be people who try to justify them self may say  that i m a narrow minded person. but I feel it is "Art which gives form to imagination". and is the best possible way to spread knowledge and teachings . but if you draw wrong art you are spreading incorrect information and teachings to the world.

plus I JUST WANT THAT OTHER PEOPLE SHOULD GIVE THE SAME RESPECT TO MAA KALI WHICH WE ALWAYS GIVE HER AS A MOTHER, MY MOTHER. IS IT SO WRONG TO ASK ? .But this is not possible if people who know who is maa kali doesn't describe her correctly. ( I AM NOT SPECIFYING THIS PARTICULAR ART ONLY)
HOW CAN PEOPLE OF " DIFFERENT RELIGION OR FAITH " CAN WILL REALLY KNOW OF WHAT MAA KALI TRULY STANDS FOR ALL THEY WILL SEE IS JUST - "A DESTROYER" (WHICH SHE DOESN'T STANDS FOR) 
SHE STANDS FOR MOTHERHOOD "NOT" SEXUALITY NUDITY OR VIOLENT RAGE. she has "never" been described as without cloths OR COMPLETELY NAKED. the old images you see please notice clearly that she is wearing a skirt of severed demon hands . and her front is all covered by garland of human skulls . along with many jewelry she is wearing like crown, Bazubandh  kamar bandh, neckless.... AND DEEPLY NOTE THAT ON ALL OCCASIONS IS IS RESPECTFULLY DRESSED   

YOU ARE WELCOME TO GO AND READ THE REAL REFERENCES AND THAN THINK. (name of reference - Durga shapshati (part of markendaya puran), Devi bhagwatam by vayas , KALIKA PURAN, Shiva Puran, Ling Puran , Vaman Puran, Varaha Puran ) every puran here describes maa kali respectifully. ) than their is "kalika tantra" "the yogani tantra" (these are the most respected tantra books ) "kamdhenu tantra" "kankal malani tantra" (these two have indirect reference)

 SO BEFORE DRAWING ASK YOUSELF WHAT IS THE ART DESCRIBING ?

A DEVI IN RAGE - Which a Infant crying or a lying body can easily calm down OR " THE MOTHERLY LOVE " FOR WHICH MAA KALI ACTUALLY STANDS FOR.. SHE IS A MOTHER who is just fierce in protecting ones own child (we are all her childrens) I HAVE RAISED THIS QUESTION TO THE "ARTIST COMMUNITY" TO ALL HOW THINK THAT :-

1.) HOW CAN THEY DESCRIBE MAA KALI WITH LITTLE OR NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HER ....??

2.) WHY ARE THEY DESCRIBING HER THE WAY THEY SEEM FIT AND CALL IT MODERNIZATION. they all are creative they can draw any thing what they want so why are they so obsessed with the destruction of evil idea , or about the sexuality or nudity idea . ???????????

3.) i find people blaming society about the ill it has and stating that they are only responsible about the art? but why their art is to bannerize the evil ? why not draw the idea which will prevent evil FROM BEING promoted ?

4.) and why not to understand art as a form of message they are spreading in this world.? why cant you relate the mother of all creation "maa kali" with the mother we all have AT OUR HOMES ?

5.) why their is "no" respect in the art ( NOTE :- i m not talking about this particular art IM TALKING ABOUT THEM WHO THINK DISRESPECTING MOTHER IS A TREND , A STYLE, A COOL IDEA )

6.) WHAT DOES MODERNIZATION MEAN HERE ? IS IT TO SHOW DISRESPECT TO YOUR OWN MOTHER FOR MONEY ? (AS HERE THE ARTIST CLEARLY STATED "ON HIS CLINT ORDERS" ?
SO FOR MONEY YOU ABANDONED TO RESPECT YOUR MOTHER ?

7.) WHAT REFERENCE IS BEING CONSIDERED HERE. ? DIDNT THE CREATOR NOTICED THAT HE IS JUST CONFUSED ? HE SHOULD FIRST CONSIDER ORIGINAL SOURCES MATERIALS NOT WEB.

8.) WHERE IS A MOTHER IN THIS ART . ? DO YOU REALLY SEE YOU OWN MOTHER WITH CANE IN HANDS ALL THE TIME.

9.) WHY ARE YOU PROMOTING THE IDEA OF MAA KALI SO WRONG AND CALLING IT MODERNIZATION.?

                                       
SO A REQUEST IF YOU ARE READING THIS AND YOU PAY RESPECT TO YOUR OWN MOTHER .PLEASE THINK BEFORE DRAWING ... PLEASE DRAW A MOTHER ... AS THIS IS WHAT SHE IS... AND NOTHING ELSE. DO NOT CHANGE THE IDEA OF WHAT SHE REALLY IS . THEIR IS NO MODERN THOUGHT THAN HONORING YOUR OWN MOTHER.

 I AM SORRY FOR IF I STATED SOMETHING WHICH COULD HAVE HURT ANY ONE . I HAVE NO DISRESPECT FOR THE ARTISTS HERE OR ANY ARTISTS HERE . I ONLY ASK RESPECT... THATS ALL

THANK YOU ...
THANK FOR READING AND PLEASE THINK BEFORE GIVING YOUR IMAGINATION ANOTHER FORM OF MAA KALI
MAY MAA KALIBLESS YOU ALL AND GUIDE YOU( IRRESPECTIVE OF HOW YOU PRESENT HER TO THE WORLD) IN YOUR WAY OF LIFE...

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

DesiMC360 [2016-01-06 08:32:54 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bhanu22 In reply to DesiMC360 [2018-01-07 10:25:02 +0000 UTC]

yes bro u r saying right but according to a story from devipuran or one importany shakhta text once godess parvati and lord shiva playing game of love in which lord shiva lost so as a punishment or u can say for loss reason godess parvati asked from lord shiva a question my lord from my 10 great forms which one u like most and why lord shiva replied my dear from out of ur 10 great froms which i like most is ur darkform kaali parvati god littile surprised curiously asked why did he chosen that form only further instigates her husband then lord shiva said the reason i like ur kaali form bcoz ur that form reflection of me and helps me to realise my true self my true nature and i also like that form in that form u r devoid of any restrictions of material world aboveor beyond rules of nature u dominates everyone even including me here iam saying u my dear that the truth without u iam corpse without shakti shiva is shav (corpse) by listening such a great answer godess parvati said asked me any boon so lord shiva can u hold and accept me with love like u do in ur kaameswari form but now as a kaali form then right then godess parvati aasume her dark form kaali and make love but tantric texts says the love godess parvati make in her kaali form is of another level extrme love to her consort this very picture is depiction of that. and always remeber and worship apart from ur paravti form to kaali form for eternity. so whcih is most famous shiva(mahakaal) parvati(mahakaali is its eternal consort or dakshineshwari kaali) this photo is correct in that love for shiva in kaali form which is also known as tantra pleaure in tantra path.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Ravimishra085 In reply to bhanu22 [2018-09-09 21:02:22 +0000 UTC]

**** A REQUEST IF YOU HAVE TIME PLEASE READ MY FULL COMMENT. IT MAY GUIDE YOU TO BUTTER UNDERSTAND MAA KALI .PLEASE DONT FALL FOR WHAT YOU SEE IN THE IMAGE DESCRIBED...    I HAVE NO DISRESPECT FOR THE CREATOR . BUT I DONT AGREE ABOUT HIS IDEA ON MAA KALI     

*** it is a request PLEASE READ ANd YOU will know WHAT IS THE CORRECT DESCRIPTION OF MAA KALI ..

AND NOW ABOUT YOUR COMMENT.


brother , i gave the information because peapole are misleaded in the appearence of maa kali . and stated how maa kali is actually described in major puran's . i ment the conncept of mordinization as some clint asked , i think is not cool.  I tried to say that maa kali stands for preservation of innocent , not for distruction of evil. so why great artist are not drawing the form of a mother, is the image you see can you see any motherhood emotions. plus the physical form ideology is all wrong , more over i stated clearly that by the orders of maa durga maa kali contained all the blood of raktbeej.


art is the oldest form of providing information(since indus times) and drawing wrong art will prove disaster. see for your own self many images posted by many creators who dont know any think about maa kali and are describing all wrong about her . thats why i in detail described her appearence so that people should know what is the real difference between what are they seeing and is the real physical appearence. (i gave full reference for that  you are free to check .) may be some people of morden society may think that is the real biggy if some one  tried to mordinize maa kali. i would say , WHY ARE NOT THEY SHOWING A MOTHER? IF PEOPLE (NOT ONLY THIS PERTICULAR ART OR ARTIST ) FEEL THE NEED OF  RENEWING THE CONCEPT. PLEASE DO IT CORRECTLY . PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT FAITH WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY . AND THIS IS NOT 1500 CE WHEN THEIR WAS NO CLOSE CONCEPT OF OBSERVING DIFFERENT FAITH, WELL BUDDHISM AND JAINISM NEVER EXISTED THAN. SO ALL i want to say is if we will give correct knowledge then only we will get correct understanding . for eg here about maa kali everything is depected wrong..  thats what i want to correct.. people should know who maa kali really is ... thats all i want . people should know her (in physical form and idea, as note no physical form is actually ever described like the depected image. i described it exactly as stated and i mentioned the reference along with the exact section or chapter it is mentioned)    


1.) now about your reference, their is no puran called devi puran - their are 1.) Durga saptashati  2.) Devi Bhagat puran. (ok i know you are not clear on names thats why i stated the correct names ) next the story you are refering to is from shiva puran (shiva sect). i understand the reason for this confusion , i can explain it to you . in shiva puran their is a section called "UMA SAMHITA" now this is 10 section of puran - this section is famous for "shumbh nishumbh, raktbeej wadh like details" . but the story you MAYBE reffereing is when "shiva somewat teased her (on the request of brahma) by saying "tum to kali ho"? (you are black in colour) on which maa parvati decided that she will loose this dark complection and will again turn to "gauri" . (this section is written in "VAAYVEE SAMHITA" (SECTION 12 OF SHIVA PURAN) now further she loosed her dark form and that dark took a form who is called as "MAA KAUSHAKI" NOTE - IT IS STATED IN THE SAME SECTION THAT SHE HAS THREE DIFFERENT FORMS "SOMYA , GHOOR, MISHRIT  " NOTE IT IS INTRESTING THAT IN WIKIPEDIA , THIS GHOOR FORM IS MISSUINDERSTOOD , WIKIPEDIA STATES THAT - AND ENRAGED KAUSHIKI IS "KALI" " IT IS TO INFORM THAT ALL THREE ARE THE STATE OF MIND OF MAA KAUSHAKI THATS WHY THREE 1.) SOOM - KIND 2.) GHOOR- ENRAGED 3.) MISHRIT - MIXED , UNDERSYTAND THIS HOW CAN SOMETHING CALLED "MIXED" BE A AVTAR , SO IT IS ACTUALLY THE STATE OF MIND. BUT FURTHER LEADING WHEN MAA KAUSHIKI GOT ENRAGED (MEANS SHE ENTERED INTO "GHOOR" STATE EHEN CHAND MUND ATTACKED HER , FROM HER FORHED MAA KALI EMERGED "WEARING A CHEETA SARI AND A SICKEL IN HER HAND" .  you may think it means same consider this from a example "suppose your boss really enraged with some clint what will he do he will send some capable person to handle the situation " that what happened their . when maa kaushiki got angry ("ghoor"state ) she asked the help of maa kali (this avtar of maa adi kali is called "PAURANIK kali" ref - kalika puran section "kali ia arth tatva"..


2.) now about the statement you gave "their is never stated ANY WHERE about maa parvati asking bhagwan shiva which form of her he likes most .(it makes sense as in mostly any puran you will find maa parvati is defined as a form of maa adi shakti ") Yes you are write about the answer of Bhagwan Shiva , that he liked her dark (kali form) but the exact answer he gave  and i quote "i called you kali for just fun" and further he stated", you are the mother of this creation and im the father of all creation.  "  now note the reference is "SHIVA PURAN SECTION -12 VAAYVEE SAMHITA from PARA 7-10 " ...     shiva puran is the first puran which explained about shiva and maa parvati at every length  AND it dosent describe your statement ANY WHERE.   their is also  is no such statement in ling puras or any other puran as well.    


NOTE - REMEMBER THESE ARE DIFFERENT AVATARS , IF SAME GODDESSES TURNS INTO SOME OTHER FORM THEY WILL NOT BE CALLED "AVATARS" AND THINK FOR ONE MOMENT IF THEIR IS NO CONCEPT OF AVATAR'S THAN HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT MAA DURGA KILLED  MAHISHASUR THAN CHAND-MUND THAN RAKTBEEJ THAN SHUMBH -NISHUMBH BY THE HELP OF MAA KALI AND OTHER NAV DEVIES..  THAN WHY CANT MAA DURGA HERSELF COULD DRANK ALL THE BLOOD OF RAKTBEEJ .    IF THEIR IS NO AVATAR AND ONLY "DIFFERENT FORM'S" LIKE THE STORY YOU READ SAYS . HOW WILL YOU ACCOUNT FOR MATA SITA , MAA LAXAMI, MAA SWARASWATI,  OR MAA SATI ( AS THIS IS THE ONLY FORM WHICH DIED . HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE THAN)  OR ANY OTHER GODDESS. YOU CANNOT .    THIS IS BECAUSE IT IS AN UNACCOUNTED STORY YOU MAY HAVE READ. AND THEY ALL ARE DIFFERENT AVATARS NOT JUST ONE SINGLE GODESSES.  


3.) now about you saying the "LOVE GODDESSES" . NOTE MY DEAR THAT IS "RATI" WIFE OF KAM DEV . NOT MAA PARVATI . SHE IS THE GODESSES WHO IS WORSHIPED FOR BETTER MARRIED LIFE AND DESIRED HUSBAND AND BLESSINGS LIKE DARUKI WORSHIPED HER FOR PROTECTION OF HER KIND. ECT.(REF IN RAMAYANA "MAA SITA" WORSHIPS "MAA PARVATI" AND ASKS HER TO GIVE RAM AS HER HUSBAND.) I THINK YOU KNOW THAT .


4.) AND "TANTRIK TEXT" WHICH TEXT YOU ARE REFERING ? . THEIR ARE REALLY TWO TEXT WHICH DESCRIBES TANTRA AND ITS RELATION TO MAA KALI AS  A TANTRIK GODESS. IT IS 1.) YOGANI TANTRA AND 2.) KALIKA TANTRA..  BUT NOTE -yogani tantra is a description of conversatation of shiva and parvati*** BUT NOTE AT THE STARTING(CHAPTER -1 ) OF HIS (BHAGWAN SHIVA) TEACHINGS BHAGWAN SHIVA ASKS BLESSINGS OF MAA ADI -KALI ..  (THIS IS REALLY COMPLEX I CANT ACCOUNT FULL DESCRIPTION NOW ) BUT ***NOTE THE TANTRA IS ABOUT MAA KALI AND MAA KAMAKHIYA ...    AND THE SECOND TANTRA I.E KALIKA TANTA - ONLY FORMS OFF MAA ADI KALI IS DESCRIBED AND HER WORSHIPING METHODS LIKE "POOJA WIDHI" , "SIDHI MANTA" , CHAKRA EXT . THEIR IS NO ACCOUNT FOR ANY CONVERSATATION THEIR..  (YOU SHOULD KNOW "TANTRA MEANS"  AN INTERWOVEN RITUAL thats why chakra are designed that way .. plus i have read - yoni tantra , kamdhenu tanta , kankalmalani tantra (they both belong to same book ) you can find some indirect references but you will never find the story you are saying ..


5.) NETHER "Durga Shapshati " nor Devi Bhagwat Puran" accounts for your story . i can describe that for you  "devi shapshati is just a short version of describing  madhu-kehatab than mahishasur chand- mund than raktbeej than shumbh nishumbh wadh" their is no account of shiva and parvati conversatation their  & in Devi bhagwat puran  their are following chapters:-


CH 1- MAIN STORY IS ABOUT MADHU - KHETAB AND ADI YOG MAYA OR MAA KALI


CH-2  ABOUT MAHABHARAT AND DESCRIBE ABOUT "GANGA PUTRA BHISHMA PRATGYA"


CH-3 IS ABOUT "NAVRAT POOJA"


CH-4 IS ABOUT BHAGWAN KRISHNA AVTAR "AND HOW MAA SAVES HIM FROM FALLING IN THE HANDS OF KANSH"


CH-5 IS ABOUT MAHISHASUR AND RAKTBEEJ ECT WADH


CH- 6 IS ABOUT MAA LAXAMI SON NAMED "EAK VEER" AND HIS WIFE "EAK VELA"


CH- 7 IS ABOUT RAJA HARISCHANDRA AND IS DAAN


CH-8 IS ABOUT CHANDRA AND OTYHER PLANETS MOVEMENT ( IT ALSO ACCOUNTS FOR RAM AND VISHNU BHAKTI BY NARADA AND HANUMAN JI)


CH- 9 IS ABOUT  GRATE LADY - TULSI


CH- 10 IS A DESCRIPTION ABOUT VERIOUS MANUJ


CH-11 IS ABOUT IMPORTANCE OF GYATRI


CH-12 CONTINUES WITH IT



SO SEE THEIR IS NO ACCOUNT OF  MAA PARVATI EVER ASKING ANY SUCH QUESTION BUT YOU ARE WRITE ABOUT THE ANSWER OF BHAGWAN SHIVA THAT IS LIKES HER KALI FORM BUT NOT THE WAY YOU DESCRIVED ..


HENCE CONCLUDING  I ANSWERED YOU TO GIVE YOU CORRECT INFORMATION AND YOU ARE WELCOME TO GO AND SEARCH ALL I STATED IN ANY OF THE REFERENCE YOU LIKE .. OR YOU STATED ..   I DOSENT NEED TO DISRESPECT YOU OR THE ARTIST I JUST WANT TO CHANGE THEIR VIEW ABOUT MAA KALI.. THATS ALL

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2015-09-17 22:10:55 +0000 UTC]

Awesome work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rajeevtantra333 [2014-12-28 17:05:46 +0000 UTC]

very nice to see good one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to rajeevtantra333 [2014-12-31 06:40:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Urbanite84 [2014-10-26 16:08:46 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous deity.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to Urbanite84 [2014-11-01 03:37:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Suvom [2014-10-25 00:11:07 +0000 UTC]

after abolish enemy time for tasting enemy blood!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to Suvom [2014-11-01 03:37:57 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

livelinksindia [2014-01-23 07:44:39 +0000 UTC]

Jai maaa Kali.... Awsm Work dude....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to livelinksindia [2014-02-02 20:17:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sanjay14 [2013-03-02 05:06:57 +0000 UTC]

jai kali maa

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to sanjay14 [2013-03-02 21:01:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DemonQueen17 [2013-02-18 23:34:40 +0000 UTC]

Bloody and beautiful.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to DemonQueen17 [2013-02-19 20:07:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kalibhakt [2013-01-16 02:23:22 +0000 UTC]

Sneezy, sexy damn hot !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Suvom In reply to kalibhakt [2014-10-25 00:11:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mikepacker In reply to kalibhakt [2013-01-16 20:40:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GodzillaD1 [2013-01-14 21:03:45 +0000 UTC]

Hot

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to GodzillaD1 [2013-01-14 21:04:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sagotharan [2013-01-10 11:10:56 +0000 UTC]

nice art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to sagotharan [2013-01-10 21:21:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Emerson-Fialho [2013-01-07 14:00:21 +0000 UTC]

Great artwork!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to Emerson-Fialho [2013-01-08 00:35:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emerson-Fialho In reply to mikepacker [2013-01-09 01:20:03 +0000 UTC]

All the best!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

michaelglowart [2013-01-06 01:52:25 +0000 UTC]

nice one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mikepacker In reply to michaelglowart [2013-01-06 02:41:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0