HOME | DD

my-little-account β€” If it ever had

#sj #deviantart #socialjustice #stamp #word #sjw #socialjusticewarrior
Published: 2015-03-25 22:05:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 6282; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description Gernerally it is supposed to mean any sort of tumblr leftist as it did in the beginning, but with the time I realized you can get called a "SJW" for any reason.

- Do you support people having some human decency? You are a SJW.
- Are you LBGTQA+? And/or mentally ill? You are a SJW (no kidding I got labeled one solely for this reason).
- Are you against right-wing ideologies in any way, form or shape? You are a SJW.
- Are you pro-choice? You are a SJW.
- Do you find egalitarianism flawed and pointless despite not being yourself a right-winger? You are a SJW.
- Do you support animal welfare? You are a SJW.
- Do you support feminism? You are a SJW.
- Are you egalitarian but not right-wing? Don't care, you are a SJW anyway.
Bonus if people tell you "go back to tumblr" and such.

This word has probably as much meaning as "commie" and "liberal" nowadays.
Related content
Comments: 223

Bug-Off [2023-09-30 07:25:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Bug-Off [2023-05-09 02:40:05 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Smoking-Wrecker2814 [2022-02-12 01:45:44 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Owl-Eye-2010 [2020-11-16 20:46:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 7 ⏩: 1

FlipMob In reply to Owl-Eye-2010 [2020-11-27 12:06:44 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 5 ⏩: 1

Owl-Eye-2010 In reply to FlipMob [2021-06-10 07:14:26 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 4 ⏩: 0

Sonulianic [2020-10-22 04:54:10 +0000 UTC]

People need to realize that sjws don't exist at all. Social Justice doesn't mean you're offended by everything, it means you believe in equal political economics for everyone.

πŸ‘: 5 ⏩: 0

LoudHarveyLefty [2020-09-01 03:36:53 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 7 ⏩: 0

SharkEnjoyer29 [2019-12-10 22:25:21 +0000 UTC]

Sjw= salty jackass women







done here’s the meaningΒ 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

munyal12 In reply to SharkEnjoyer29 [2021-02-02 04:52:23 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yspc [2019-05-17 18:45:49 +0000 UTC]

Yes it does have a meaning,Β  SJWs think that perfectly normal things are hateful.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

Redfoxbennington [2019-04-17 02:44:04 +0000 UTC]

Why can't Anti SJWs say it already? Just say you don't like women and minorities and move on

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

yudrontheglatorian In reply to Redfoxbennington [2019-07-22 15:07:30 +0000 UTC]

simple: that would be a lie.

no anti-SJW i know of, genuinely hates women and minorities. SJWs just always pretend that they do, because that is all they can do: accusing somebody of things they didn't do.

many anti-SJWs i know of ARE women and minorities and they are well accepted.

like Blaire White, a trans woman. or Sydney Watson.

or JLongBone and SomeBlackGuy

so tell me, how can anti-SJWs hate women and minorities, while these people are well accepted into their communities?


answer is: you're wrong. anti-SJWs don't hate women and minorities, they just hate SJWs. and SJWs don't actually care about anyone, they just care about being praised as heroes. that's why they don't take it too well, when a WOMAN criticizes them. or when a black man mocks them. or when a trans person says "you need dysphoria to be trans and there are only two genders."

SJWs HATE IT when the people they CLAIM to protect, think for themselves. they always pretend that women and minorities are obliged to agree with them, on every topic. and if they don't, the SJWs often bully them into submission.

anti-SJWs are often just harmless trolls, that seek for something to laugh at, at worst. (and no, they are not affiliated with the alt-right. the alt-right doesn't like them. they consider anti-SJWs as "SJWs in denial".)

SJWs are crybullies, who also condone violence, if it serves their purpose.

like poisoning the dog of a woman, who wanted to open up a man-shelter.

πŸ‘: 3 ⏩: 1

Redfoxbennington In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2019-07-22 16:13:25 +0000 UTC]

It's the edgy classic "I'm a minoritity so its ok I can talk shit about other races including my own." Excuse.

Anti-SJW constantly act like SJW's because they get angry over non-issues like "video game has female antagonist but she is not a thot wtfwtf? Feminist are behind this" when the best thing you could have dones was ignore them.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

yudrontheglatorian In reply to Redfoxbennington [2019-07-22 18:09:43 +0000 UTC]

"It's the edgy classic "I'm a minoritity so its ok I can talk shit about other races including my own." Excuse."

except they don't shit on people, because of their race, but because of their arguments.

"Anti-SJW constantly act like SJW's"

they actually don't. if they did, they would doxx people, lie about their opposition and be emotionally manipulative.

"because they get angry over non-issues"

you're the one to talk. SJWs get upset about video game characters, hitting digital women. and then they use the "video games cause violence!" argument, only with the change that they add a "against women" to it.

i think that you should be able to beat up both men and women in a game.

"like "video game has female antagonist but she is not a thot wtfwtf? Feminist are behind this"

i have never heard of this. but if this is the worst you got...

it actually proves my point.
i quote: "anti-SJWs are often just harmless trolls, that seek for something to laugh at, at worst. " and yes, they sometimes complain about SJWs too much... but that's the worst thing they can do, as anti-SJWs.

SJWs would send you death-threats and would try to doxx you.

"when the best thing you could have dones was ignore them."

ok, then just tell the SJWs to simply ignore the things they don't like. like why didn't they just ignore the anti-SJWs, when they complained about Ghostbusters 2016?

is it me or are you pulling a number of "it's for thee, but not for me"?

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Redfoxbennington In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2019-07-23 04:18:00 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm ok but aren't K*wifarmers anti-SJW?Β  Don't they doxx mentally disabled people and trans and "sjw"?Β 

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

yudrontheglatorian In reply to Redfoxbennington [2019-07-23 08:47:27 +0000 UTC]

i don't think kiwi-farmers are affiliated with anyone, really.

i even found theQuartering, another anti-SJW, on there.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Carno-Crusader [2019-02-13 00:40:54 +0000 UTC]

Sadly, it is quite true. Same goes with Alt-Right.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

yudrontheglatorian [2019-01-19 21:20:47 +0000 UTC]

"N-NO, you can't call me a Nazi! that term has no meaning anymore!"

this is how your stamp sounds like to me.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

ABRAVA In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2019-10-05 21:34:08 +0000 UTC]

It lost its meaning as people never read history as funny enough Hitler would be more atheist and hated all religion and supported specific races to be equal based on DNA and not physical appearances lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tultsi93 [2018-07-28 15:19:54 +0000 UTC]

- How wanting human decency is being an SJW? Even some Conservatives want that.

- I don't count asexuality in LGBT, but I do have Autism diagnosed by a doctor.

- Heck, I'm a right-winger and even I'm against part of right-wing ideologies!

- I'm pro-life, but I support abortion in certain situations.

- Well, not everything's perfect.

- So, poaching and animal cruelty don't exist?

- Were 1st wave feminists and 2nd wave feminists also SJWs?

- I'm both. But would get called SJW, anyway because of my opinions.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Fat-FAN [2018-03-08 01:22:57 +0000 UTC]

Both "SJWs" and "Anti-SJWs" are stupid as hell.

No, SJW's it is NOT unreasonable that someone expects you to back up your own arguments.
No, Anti-SJW's not every story starring a female lead is propaganda.

πŸ‘: 3 ⏩: 4

yudrontheglatorian In reply to Fat-FAN [2019-01-19 21:10:26 +0000 UTC]

most anti-SJWs i've seen, have ZERO PROBLEMS with female protagonists.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JackiHime In reply to yudrontheglatorian [2021-06-23 15:57:19 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

ALEXIYXVII In reply to Fat-FAN [2018-09-01 16:46:37 +0000 UTC]

^^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mega-hax In reply to Fat-FAN [2018-07-24 06:57:42 +0000 UTC]

^^^^^^^
Both sides are really fucking obnoxious smh

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZekeEugene In reply to Fat-FAN [2018-03-10 01:51:15 +0000 UTC]

Now this is something that we can agree with.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EarthAngel87 [2018-01-03 15:16:12 +0000 UTC]

Did it EVER have any meaning? It always seemed like a thought-terminating cliche intended to shut people up whenever they said things you didn't like (similar to how a lot of people use words like "hipster" or "poseur," the latter of which they usually misspell).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pinka13 [2017-12-26 00:17:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh look! A rant on Anita Sarkeesian! Gee, I wonder if the ranter will make the EXACT SAME POINTS and the EXACT SAME JOKES as EVERY OTHER VIDEO MADE ON HER?!

20+ mins later... Oh look! They did!

(I'm not saying I support Anita. Hell, even I think she's annoying. But I'm so sick of rabid anti -sjws basically making the exact same rant video over and over, on an already overdone topic).

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

Askthisdude In reply to Pinka13 [2018-02-09 06:17:00 +0000 UTC]

To be fair most don't talk about her anymore. Not sure where you've been looking.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cinnamoncustard [2017-12-06 11:40:27 +0000 UTC]

I couldn't agree more!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Luckero-Wolf [2017-11-06 06:53:30 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't a word in the first place, it was an abbreviation of three words

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheSocialistVegan [2017-10-22 09:22:21 +0000 UTC]

Damn right, I am sick of so-called anti-SJWS who are mostly all right wing, especially on DA, who accuse a lot of left-wing progressives of being SJWS. When in fact it's the anti-SJWS who act more like SJWS. Keyboard warriors even who don't bother with activism or any kind of campaigning and instead just say shit about those who are actually out doing things.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

ClockwiseSarcasm [2017-08-22 03:30:52 +0000 UTC]

I only define people as sjw when i use it for ridiculously aggressive people who actually FIT the stereotype of sjws.Β 
But people apparently think that "Disagreeing with my opinion = sjw". Which is NOT the case.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

evilinna In reply to ClockwiseSarcasm [2017-08-30 23:27:17 +0000 UTC]

same execpt for me it's feminist. (at my school, at least.)

Here's what the kiddos at my school think a feminist is:
-A female with depression? FEMINIST!!!1
-A female who can enjoy SOME offensive jokes? FEMINIST!!11
-A female who has a crush on a dude? FEMMINIST!!!1111
-A female who hates getting bullied? FEMINIST!1!1

(yes. kids at my school actually think that this makes you a feminist.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Sakuraofchaos In reply to evilinna [2019-06-25 19:34:25 +0000 UTC]

Wow. I'm all those (except 3 cause I don't get crushes) and that's stupid.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ClockwiseSarcasm In reply to evilinna [2017-08-30 23:35:10 +0000 UTC]

You'd think they'd call someone a feminist if they DIDN'T like offensive jokes (which is pretty common for stereotypical feminists)


But they all sound so ignorant oh my god

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

evilinna In reply to ClockwiseSarcasm [2017-08-30 23:56:44 +0000 UTC]

trust me, they are ignorant as hell.

(what i mean by offensive jokes is that i enjoy all offensive jokes except when they're taken too far. for example: kids in my grade said it was a joke to do the nazi salute when i was around them, because i'm the only jewish kid in school. because, y'know, that's totally not anti-semetic!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ClockwiseSarcasm In reply to evilinna [2017-08-31 00:27:25 +0000 UTC]

If they were regular sorta nazi jokes I'd really not care too much since humor is humor. But holy shit, only because you were the only jewish kid? That's pretty shitty to do. Were they aware it made you uncomfortable?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

evilinna In reply to ClockwiseSarcasm [2017-08-31 03:51:11 +0000 UTC]

they knew it made me hella uncomfortable, yet they still did it (because doing a nazi salute is TOTAALY a joke amirite?!? sarcasm)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ClockwiseSarcasm In reply to evilinna [2017-08-31 09:35:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, those guys are assholes. Sorry to hear you have to face that ;;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ScarlettMinx [2017-07-30 02:59:14 +0000 UTC]

I'm liberal, not a fucking nutcase sjw who gets super upset over everything

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

MebroukTheCat In reply to ScarlettMinx [2023-03-24 15:14:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkSnarkArtie89 [2017-05-01 20:21:38 +0000 UTC]

Back when the term was coined in the 90s, it very specifically was about the overall zealotry combined with "slackivism" that some people exhibited when standing up for certain rights.

Now it's about as meaningful as the words "furry" and "troll" are. It constantly has to be redefined by people in order to fit whatever scenario you want it to fit in. And really, just dare criticize anything as opposed to "simply consuming" it and you'll be seen as a big-n-scary SJW.

- Criticize "sex sells" and other forms of objectification on the basis that because people have different sexual fantasies and preferences than what is marketed, it's awkward and bizarre? You're a whiny SJW "snowflake".

- State that the video game industry is made up of pansies who can't take criticism and think any game with a 8+ rating is just paid shills licking the boots of publishers, all the while believing there needs to be diversity on many more levels (from character design to genres) and aware that there's pinball machines older than you making more money than a Nintendo console? You're clearly a pasty SJW for that...

- Think gendered bathrooms are pointless and mostly about creating artificial shortage of how many toilets can be used at a time? Dirty Neoliberalist! You ignoramous SJW!

- Believe that people who love animals need to stop playing favorites and stand up for more than cute, furry mammals... Well um, that might make you a monster more than a SJW to some people...

Bonus Points: You're being called all these things despite being a furry fetish artist, which I assume would cause some heads to explode because how could you be for some rights and respects when you clearly do things that would be against those rights and respects?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

liveforevr [2017-03-06 21:14:39 +0000 UTC]

honestly these people are just looking for excuses to be mediocreΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Askthisdude [2017-02-26 06:40:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it does, depends who uses it and what for. I think it's more about liberal stupidity.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gavin-The-Bunny [2017-02-05 13:33:29 +0000 UTC]

I think "SJW" and "anti-SJW' are both strawmen arguments at this stage.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Randomstuff-Stuff [2016-08-13 17:51:24 +0000 UTC]

That's why I love it! IT MEANS NOTHING! I love the chaos! I LOVE IT!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ReclusiveChicken [2016-05-27 18:30:06 +0000 UTC]

Welp, that's one good thing you've said.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Akhnaton-II [2016-04-30 09:34:40 +0000 UTC]

A good description of what is going on under some of my stamps. Using!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>