HOME | DD

NateSonOfSimp — Cybran Destroyer

Published: 2011-03-10 22:07:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 13729; Favourites: 169; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description A concept for Supreme Commander 2, released in 2010 by Gas Powered Games and Square Enix.
Related content
Comments: 11

EvilCleric [2012-12-10 09:05:47 +0000 UTC]

I definitely like the look, but that isn't a destroyer mate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Davidpoet30 [2011-12-16 20:20:11 +0000 UTC]

i love this

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrTBSC [2011-09-16 23:44:47 +0000 UTC]

<<< likes Forged alliance more then SupCom 2 ... but SupCop 2 has some cool units

uef kingkriptor, flying fortress ... nice stuff
cybran krakensubmarine ( oh god i real hard )
aeon ... tx hovertank seemed the only thing usefull but not that impressive

forged alliance needs those ... quickly !!!

on the pic ... nice one has one thing with the FA megalith in common ^^ (dual doublebarreled cannons)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Forzatoadx In reply to MrTBSC [2012-03-10 21:06:20 +0000 UTC]

I am playing FA and I heard that SC2 sucks, should I bother getting it? Like, is it worth it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrTBSC In reply to Forzatoadx [2012-03-10 22:09:15 +0000 UTC]

... sup com 2 is more a mainstream like RTS ... the ecosystem from Supcom 1 and FA was shratched (so if you don't have money you can't build)
the techtrees also so that upgrading only works via producing researchpoints from researchbuildings.
you only have a couple of baseunits and buildings (but those can be upgraded as can buildings with some attachments such as shields or AA)
known experimentals were weakened or lost some abilitys (example: fatboy is not a factory anymore as is the aeon mothership)
the only good point is there are MORE experimentals then before but again compareable weaker then from supcom 1 or FA ... so that building experimentals doesn't mean beeing a early gameender ...

i say go download the Sup Com 2 demo to see for yourself (and go use the debug mode that has nearly all its units in) or go watch some reviews or useropinions on those reviews or gameforums

but IMO if you realy LOVED sup com 1 or FA ... you likely will be dissapointed about the huge changes that had been done in supcom 2

Supcom 2 in it self isn't a bad game ... but compared to its predecessor it's not a "SUPREME"-commander ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Forzatoadx In reply to MrTBSC [2012-03-11 15:52:05 +0000 UTC]

Ok, I started playing this morning, with the DLC... is it just me or the Monkeylords suck big time now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrTBSC In reply to Forzatoadx [2012-03-11 15:55:03 +0000 UTC]

as i said ... experimentals aren't gameenders anymore

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

frozenfire100 [2011-03-22 01:50:24 +0000 UTC]

looks like the aircraft carrier....idk if its just me tho

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Peter-Hon [2011-03-11 01:53:53 +0000 UTC]

I'm loving these, Nate. Any particular inspirations? Macross? Gundam? Gradius?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NateSonOfSimp In reply to Peter-Hon [2011-03-15 17:00:02 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Peter-Hon In reply to NateSonOfSimp [2011-03-15 18:33:20 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to take a guess that its everything in my DVD collection.



Robot Jocks.

Or was it JOX with a "x".... hmmm.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0