HOME | DD

Published: 2012-04-10 23:55:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 219; Favourites: 6; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description
One cookie for the one who knows what weapon he's usingMeh, just a small doodle I did out of boredom after realizing that most of the firearms I've drawn are flat.
*There's no specific nationality for this guy, I've drawn randomly around the rifle
Related content
Comments: 25
NDTwoFives In reply to Ravajava [2012-04-12 13:23:44 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, someone noticed the stamped receiver! :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ravajava In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-12 16:09:10 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I totally noticed the stamped receiver!
I just did some good ol' deduction and elimination From previous comments and the description, it left only one choice, from my knowledge at least.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NDTwoFives In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-04-11 13:43:20 +0000 UTC]
I'll think about that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jailgurdnegative In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-12 13:58:43 +0000 UTC]
so, it's not the AK-103?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to jailgurdnegative [2012-04-12 14:02:07 +0000 UTC]
Nope, someone just got it right, it's the AKM :s
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-04-11 02:45:34 +0000 UTC]
Could be, considering the size of the rear sight block on the RPK
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-11 03:21:26 +0000 UTC]
i admit im not to famlilure with the AK line, other then the 47 , 74 u, and the RPK ..but that's mostly because the current enemy cant accord anything but a crappy made 47
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-04-11 03:52:10 +0000 UTC]
Well, sometimes that's what they can afford
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-12 15:09:20 +0000 UTC]
hell im not complaining, rather them use a rifle that cant hit crap past 250 meters then one thats accurate and well made.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-04-12 16:38:40 +0000 UTC]
Ahh, here we go again with the M16 vs AKM debate
I would take an M16 over it, it has a larger variety of accessories.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-14 17:11:44 +0000 UTC]
i would take a Scar over any of them.. or a Sig 556,or a ACR ..or a Famas.. or a Tavor.. i only need two things extra on my rifle, a ACOG and a front grip, those all either can use that or are designed so you dont HAVE to use that
almost forgot the Styre AUG
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-04-14 18:15:26 +0000 UTC]
Ever thought of the 6.5mm Grendel/6.8mm Remington SPC converted AR-15s?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Streaked-Silver In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-15 03:15:47 +0000 UTC]
i dont like the AR platform. its controls are awkward, i hate how you have to not only take the rifle out of your shoulder to clear or troubleshoot a jam. but you have to take your hand off of the grip as well. The direct gas impingement system is retarded because you are using the very thing that jams up your gun to bring the bolt back. the piston tube removes the ability for a collapsible buttstock which would be VERY useful in armored vehicles. Its the only gun design that requires a forward assist to make the first round loaded seat property and it over heats when fired in in a manor that would be conductive to a extended fire fight.
The problem isn't the round, the round is great, its accurate its light and it has the power it needs to stop a foe, the problem is the weapon its self. it wasw designed poorly and for some reason we had to stick with it instead of following everyone else with the FN FAL ..
Canada and the US are the only people who use the AR platform, and we have offered it to MANY of our allies and they always turn us down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Streaked-Silver [2012-04-15 03:24:20 +0000 UTC]
More of a folding stock, like the G36 and SIG55X series. Yeah, you're right about that forward assist, they left it here in case the weapon jams, but most rifles I've seen don't even need one because they are reliable enough.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pbohm [2012-04-11 00:26:53 +0000 UTC]
Looks good, I almost ducked lol. I'll hazard a guess at one of the AK-74/74 family.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Pbohm [2012-04-11 00:30:38 +0000 UTC]
You're almost there, it's an AK, but not the recent 74s.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pbohm In reply to NDTwoFives [2012-04-11 00:35:05 +0000 UTC]
Sweet, I always have a hard time telling them apart
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NDTwoFives In reply to Pbohm [2012-04-11 00:35:51 +0000 UTC]
It has no extended muzzle break
👍: 0 ⏩: 1