HOME | DD

Published: 2012-11-22 04:34:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 6032; Favourites: 313; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description
Yip yip yip yipBG : [link]
Related content
Comments: 492
Derroflcopter In reply to ??? [2014-08-26 17:41:47 +0000 UTC]
www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-mβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-26 17:43:26 +0000 UTC]
see what I mean
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-26 19:27:25 +0000 UTC]
Just admit you lost the argument miserably and tried to cover it up by changing the subject to something completely irrelevant.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-26 19:34:19 +0000 UTC]
no I will not admit it go watch the movie God's not dead then lets see who's right
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-26 20:30:55 +0000 UTC]
Go read some science books and then let's see who's right.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-26 23:52:30 +0000 UTC]
science doesnt prove evolution it a theory im sorry but if you dont believe in God your going to burn in hell i am a 13 year old girl standing for my faith
and i wont stop you can do anything you want but i wont believe in that crap
π: 0 β©: 2
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 01:03:13 +0000 UTC]
Miss, I think you're confused about what a theory is.Β rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scientifβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 01:54:08 +0000 UTC]
I know what a theory is its something that hasn't been proven but observed
even Charles Darwin said he was wrong but people thought he was crazy
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 02:32:22 +0000 UTC]
Darwin never had a deathbed denial. It was a pious fabribation by a woman he never knew, Elizabeth Cotton. Darwin's family and several historians confirmed he never recanted his theory, and even if he did, it would hold no weight in the light of the mountain of evidence in favor of the evolutionary theory.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 11:51:13 +0000 UTC]
see ha theory not fact !!
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 12:31:49 +0000 UTC]
and six day young earth creation is failed hypothesis not fact ha ha #rekt #swag
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 12:32:53 +0000 UTC]
earth wasn't made by science you idiot
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 12:46:25 +0000 UTC]
Argument by assertion fallacy.Β rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentβ¦
And of course science didn't make the world, science is a human system of acquiring knowledge of natural phenomena by objective observation.Β en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science Natural events did.Β en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturaliβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 12:48:26 +0000 UTC]
oh thank you and I really just don't want to argue
π: 0 β©: 0
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 00:41:49 +0000 UTC]
I just love it when people think I'm an atheist when I'm actually a practicing Presbyterian. Because thinking for myself and having opinions means I'm a godless hellbound sinner, right?
And you believe that approximately five billion people are going to burn in hell eternally for just not believing in the right God?
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 01:52:42 +0000 UTC]
only people who don't believe in God burn in hell I don't need to read science because the bible is all the proof I need
and if you don't believe me I feel truly sorry for you but im not forcing you to believe anything you may be older then me
but it doesn't mean your more smart
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 02:52:51 +0000 UTC]
"Only people who don't believe in God burn in hell."
So you're basically saying that you can be a serial killer or a rapist and still go to heaven if you believe in the (Biblical) God?
"I don't need to read science because the Bible is all the proof I need".
Do you believe in the Bible because you read it, studied and analyzed the evidence for it, and then came to the conclusion that it's the literal and inerrant word of God, or where you indoctrinated into believing it?
And if you don't believe me, I feel truly sorry for you.
If anyone gave me extremely compelling evidence that the universe was literally created in the span of six days 6,000 years ago, I guarantee you that I would believe it and admit I was wrong. Thus far, though, no such thing has happened to me, so I'm a theistic evolutionist.Β rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fun:Creaβ¦
"You may be older than me,Β but it doesn't mean you're smarter."
No, but you still have a hell lot to learn.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 11:50:31 +0000 UTC]
yes it does mean that and the earth is around 6,000
all im saying is that the earth wasn't made by science
example: if you want a paper plane and put the paper on the table
is that paper plane going to make its self
Genesis 1:1- God said let there be light and he saw that it was good,and so on in the six days of creation
I don't know if your still in school but I can see why my mom didn't put me in public school they brain wash
children
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 12:39:27 +0000 UTC]
>The universe needs an eternal source.
>Therefore, it was made in six days.
Non sequitur.Β rationalwiki.org/wiki/Non_sequβ¦
You've got it flip-flopped. At public school science classes, they show kids the theories and provide evidence to support it. In fundamentalist schools, they say "believe this or go to hell".
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 12:41:39 +0000 UTC]
ok let me ask you this do you believe God created the universe and everything in it
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 12:49:23 +0000 UTC]
Yes. But not in a six-day period 6,000 years ago.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 12:50:21 +0000 UTC]
if you read genesis it will explain everything please just at least try
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 12:57:16 +0000 UTC]
Miss, I study the Bible almost every day. I've read through Genesis chapters 1 and 2 hundreds of times throughout my life. It's an ancient campfire story about how God made the Earth and humanity written by some guys during the Babylonian Captivity as a response to Babylonian polytheistic creation stories back then. It's not a scientific or historical document.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 12:59:06 +0000 UTC]
yeah I know but the earth isn't millions to billions of years old and someone that studies the bible should know that
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 13:06:18 +0000 UTC]
That's not what the Earth says. rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence⦠Notice that I always cite sources for evidence to back up my claims?
I've studied the Bible long and hard. It isn't a science book. The Earth isn't 6,000 years old. It's 4 billion years old.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 13:10:03 +0000 UTC]
hahahahaha read the bible my face it so isnt who told you that
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 13:38:34 +0000 UTC]
99% of the whole scientific community and common sense "told me that".
I've studied scripture, and several different versions of it. derroflcopter.deviantart.com/a⦠I carry a little New Testament in my backpack and I read it to and from school. You think I'm pulling your friggin' leg? I'm even starting a theology group, for goodness' sakes. ecclesia-theologica.deviantart⦠My Yea is Yea and my Nay is Nay (guess where that phrase comes from?). Take it or leave it.
But it doesn't matter, because the oldness of the Earth is a fact. I've given you several sources, and you've ignored them all. If you have nothing else to say, get out of my face.
π: 0 β©: 1
pantheratigris10 In reply to Derroflcopter [2014-08-27 13:41:43 +0000 UTC]
oh wow just wow i'll get out of your face but im right
π: 0 β©: 1
Derroflcopter In reply to pantheratigris10 [2014-08-27 13:44:34 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to ??? [2014-07-23 16:51:02 +0000 UTC]
I know what a theory is, and it shouldn't be ignored. It's a theory! People put all of their trust into something that isn't even a 100% sure, because a theory isn't 100%.
π: 0 β©: 4
FunnyFurryFox In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2015-01-13 01:35:29 +0000 UTC]
Well God is not a theory, he is like Edward from Twilight, he is FICTIONAL
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to FunnyFurryFox [2015-01-13 10:31:55 +0000 UTC]
You can't prove that a god doesn't exist and rely on hypothesis to "prove" what you think is true.
π: 0 β©: 1
FunnyFurryFox In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2015-01-13 23:23:10 +0000 UTC]
Okay I wont argue with you because you look like a God-tard
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to FunnyFurryFox [2015-01-14 00:00:58 +0000 UTC]
Seriously, you can't prove or disprove something such as a concept. So stop with the labels.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sotkettu In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2014-09-27 19:26:13 +0000 UTC]
Also gravition is just a theory but still we are not floating everywhere because gravitation does not exist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to Sotkettu [2014-09-27 22:34:35 +0000 UTC]
Another reply...
π: 0 β©: 1
Sotkettu In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2014-09-28 05:25:33 +0000 UTC]
yes, this is a public discussion so everyone an reply. You should lear the difference of a hypothesis (example: creation story from Bible) a theory, and a scientific theory (example: evolution).
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to Sotkettu [2014-09-28 16:26:16 +0000 UTC]
Same thing, as long research holds up. Yes, a hypothesis can change.
So many people replied to my first comment on this stamp. This is, like an achievement. XD Any more, then I'll have to make a journal about it. I already attracted a troll on this. XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Derroflcopter In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2014-08-24 13:36:43 +0000 UTC]
This crap is beginning to piss me off. rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scientifβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
Naynaycorn In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2014-07-27 05:53:17 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry that you've gotten yourself confused. People say it's a theory to not offend anyone. It is and actual fact.
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to Naynaycorn [2014-07-27 16:20:15 +0000 UTC]
A theory is not a fact.
π: 0 β©: 1
Naynaycorn In reply to Internetexplorer968 [2014-08-19 04:41:17 +0000 UTC]
That is the exact opposite of what i said.
π: 0 β©: 1
Internetexplorer968 In reply to Naynaycorn [2014-08-19 19:08:53 +0000 UTC]
But the fact is that "evolution is a theory," meaning it is not a fact. A fact is something that can be absolutely proven with hardcore, solid evidence that has been tested to be true, including it's 100% correct. A theory is not fact.
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>