HOME | DD

Nekromanda β€” Stamp: One Way Speech

Published: 2012-05-11 12:44:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 4389; Favourites: 284; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description It's interesting how some people occasionally think that freedom of speech means that THEY get to have their say, and that it means that NOBODY ELSE can say anything about what they said.

Freedom of Speech isn't a one way street.

Yes, you are free to have your say. But that doesn't mean that I have to sit by and hold my tongue. No, if you say something particularly stupid, people are gonna call you out on it. It might offend you or make you angry, but baby, that's freedom for ya.


Bg: [link]
Temp: [link]


Click here for ALL of my Stamps
Click here for Religious Stamps
Click here for Political Stamps
Related content
Comments: 76

MadKingFroggy [2016-07-05 01:13:06 +0000 UTC]

It also isn't a valid reason to justify hate speech or spreading very ignorant harmful views either.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

DaiKunz [2015-10-03 15:06:00 +0000 UTC]

Totally agreed, I just wish all of these people using ''freedom of speech'' to post hate/bullying/verbal harm would understand that they have limits... in fact, its illegal ---->Β civil-rights.lawyers.com/civil…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDarkHeretic [2015-09-27 23:21:20 +0000 UTC]

To 100% agreed Β - same rights for everyone !

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Commander-Dominic [2015-06-19 02:47:18 +0000 UTC]

So true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

QuirkyCuriousBex [2015-06-14 23:00:29 +0000 UTC]

Some people don't know what "freedom of speech" actually means.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

ToastyBrain [2015-05-16 09:34:11 +0000 UTC]

Well, this sums up two of my biggest YouTube arguments. They put my arguments/opinions down as retarded, yet think theirs is fact. I may have faltered of had one or two weak arguments at one point in each, but I still kept to my arguments, and was backed up by other users as well.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

MyLittleTripod [2015-02-26 18:54:38 +0000 UTC]

"Freedom of speech means freedom to shout whenever, wherever and whatever you want, and the other person has to listen to you. And if anyone dares to shout back at you, that person is infringing upon your "freedom of speech". And freedom of speech becomes secondary when large amounts of that speech are critical of you. Once this happens, unity is what becomes important."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MSJakeAdventures [2014-06-12 07:36:02 +0000 UTC]

Freedom of speech means the U.S government can't completely shut you down. Private citizens do what the hell they want. Clearly this isn't /always/ a good thing, but it usualy works.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BrandyDerg [2014-05-22 14:55:39 +0000 UTC]

FINNALY someone that thinks like me i ALLWAYS say what i think even if i get beaten
up for saying the true about someone i dont care im not the kinda guy to just sit down
and shut my yap if i must tell my opinion i will dont care what happens to me ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wwwarea [2014-02-14 14:14:17 +0000 UTC]

Heh, yeah that's true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hadescabin13 [2013-10-17 23:16:07 +0000 UTC]

Just favoriting all of stamps, don't mind me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to hadescabin13 [2013-10-18 01:05:38 +0000 UTC]

Haha thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LordElthibar [2013-08-13 17:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Then stop treating it like one.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to LordElthibar [2013-08-15 00:31:16 +0000 UTC]

What makes you think I treat it like a one way street?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LordElthibar In reply to Nekromanda [2013-08-15 10:16:50 +0000 UTC]

Well you people are trying to shut our protesters up.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to LordElthibar [2013-08-15 14:54:10 +0000 UTC]

Er, you people? Β Which "you people" do I belong to? And how am I trying to shut up protesters? Could you clarify a bit?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LordElthibar In reply to Nekromanda [2013-08-15 15:09:11 +0000 UTC]

What do "you" mean "you people"?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Nat-Evans In reply to LordElthibar [2013-11-10 01:20:28 +0000 UTC]

lol dood wut was that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nekromanda In reply to LordElthibar [2013-08-15 16:16:55 +0000 UTC]

You said "you people are trying to shut our protesters up." I'm not understanding what you mean, who are you associating me with and why are they "trying to shut our protesters up"? You'll have to be more specific when you leave comments here otherwise it comes off as just random words.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Astrall99 In reply to Nekromanda [2016-01-09 12:52:20 +0000 UTC]

I think he means the homomisiacs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CreeppingDeath [2013-08-04 17:29:25 +0000 UTC]

yeah, awesome stamp! I get irritated by da nazis for example who enjoy their freedom of speech and insult others


I think that in fact there must be a limit even to a freedom to say what you wantΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nat-Evans In reply to CreeppingDeath [2013-11-10 01:26:41 +0000 UTC]

interesting point! i think the 'limit' would be education. you can speak your mind up but you should be reasonable and not offensive o .o i think if you follow those rules you'd be fine


and by reasonable i mean, don't bitch about shit when you have no point at all, or bash at one person for all flaws in a fandom they like. [for instance, one may not like fury art, but go around hating on every furry work is absurd as hell. and even stuff like child pornography, that we all should be against, we can still speak against it without being offending the artist] that's not using free speech, it's abusing it, and being a douchebag Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreeppingDeath In reply to Nat-Evans [2013-11-10 14:02:29 +0000 UTC]

yeah i think you're right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nat-Evans In reply to CreeppingDeath [2013-11-10 15:26:40 +0000 UTC]

rawr :3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CreeppingDeath In reply to Nat-Evans [2013-11-10 15:42:32 +0000 UTC]

meowΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

theubbergeek2 [2013-06-21 06:30:55 +0000 UTC]

Very still alas important, as we have all those rightwing trash radios raising hell about how 'they ARE free speech' (barf), trashing gays, women, immigrants, wellfare peoples, etc, but when someoine denunciate clear hate speeches from them... SLAPP lawsuits came.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nat-Evans In reply to theubbergeek2 [2013-11-10 01:30:02 +0000 UTC]

jesus D: that's not free speech, that's political aggression o  .o raping 'free speech' concept. free speech never meant 'free ticket to be be politically incorret, agressive and offensive asshole", people should be educated and respectful before using free speech ¬¬ arg!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

joshuarmour15 [2013-04-26 15:50:25 +0000 UTC]

You don't have freedom of speech without freedom to insult.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theubbergeek2 In reply to joshuarmour15 [2013-06-21 06:31:38 +0000 UTC]

The freedom of one stop at ther rights and dignity of another...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

joshuarmour15 In reply to theubbergeek2 [2013-06-21 08:23:21 +0000 UTC]

Oh really? Jim Carey calls gun owners heartless mother fuckers. Is he attacked legally? No. He simply becomes even less popular. Freedom of speech.
Mark Levin calls homosexuality unnatural. He received no repercussions legally. He simply becomes unpopular with those he sees as unnatural. Its called freedom of speech, and I honeatlydont care about the so-called dignity of our unlawful president, and will say what I wish about him. He will do nothing because I HAVE A RIGHT TO SAY WHAT I WANT. So screw the dignityof aanother

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theubbergeek2 In reply to joshuarmour15 [2013-06-21 08:34:52 +0000 UTC]

Hate speech is not Free speech.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

joshuarmour15 In reply to theubbergeek2 [2013-06-22 17:27:39 +0000 UTC]

"rightwing trash radios raising hell" qualifies as hate speech. You can say it without repercussion from the law. Therefore its free speech. Logic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

theubbergeek2 In reply to joshuarmour15 [2013-06-23 00:22:02 +0000 UTC]

You never heard how low it gets, eh?

Yes, it get that low at times.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

joshuarmour15 In reply to theubbergeek2 [2013-06-23 15:45:04 +0000 UTC]

I listen to it on a regular basis. Usually, john justice and James t Harris speak about the foolishness of the government in passing bills to fix roads and no roads getting fixed, idiots doing stupid things, hipocricy of Santorum in lying to get coated in then changing his colors, and our border not being protected from invaders. We should at least stem the flow of drug and human slave trafficking,though I honestly think we should legalize, tax and regulate it. Mark Levin speaks about theidiots in congress not dong their job and how the polititians twisted words around in order for obamacare to be put in place. Limbaugh, Savage and those like them are not truly considered serious. Most of their supposed "hate speech" is in conversations when they get attacked by a gay rights activist, abortionist, or unreasoning democrat and they call them idiots after hanging up on them because the guest is talking over them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Maiki-n-Slash [2013-03-23 16:18:21 +0000 UTC]

Tell me about it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonQuestWes [2013-02-17 18:34:45 +0000 UTC]

People just have no idea how freedom of speech works.

It just means you can't get arrested by the government.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

InnocentArcticFox [2013-01-30 04:07:38 +0000 UTC]

I know someone who seriously needs to get this through her thick skull >:V

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vyanni-Krace-ACE [2013-01-27 11:29:37 +0000 UTC]

Freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to abuse. People should never be allowed to get away with that or use freedom of speech to do so: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Vyanni-Krace-ACE In reply to Vyanni-Krace-ACE [2013-01-27 11:30:13 +0000 UTC]

Freedom of speech=/=Freedom to hurt/discriminate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ImpTheArtist In reply to Vyanni-Krace-ACE [2013-05-01 19:21:09 +0000 UTC]

B-but... muh freedums!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Vyanni-Krace-ACE In reply to Vyanni-Krace-ACE [2013-01-27 11:31:26 +0000 UTC]

Its called morality. And knowing the difference between right and wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FanofJura [2012-06-04 19:15:35 +0000 UTC]

The problem is that for many people, it's free speech so long as you don't disagree with them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to FanofJura [2012-06-05 00:23:17 +0000 UTC]

This is very true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kotego [2012-05-12 02:19:24 +0000 UTC]

Freedom of speech pretty much guarantees that you will be offended.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to Kotego [2012-05-12 07:48:00 +0000 UTC]

Haha true!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DrMcQuark [2012-05-12 00:35:39 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to DrMcQuark [2012-05-12 01:35:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tawana [2012-05-11 19:41:55 +0000 UTC]

God thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Nekromanda In reply to Tawana [2012-05-12 00:06:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tawana In reply to Nekromanda [2012-05-12 00:07:29 +0000 UTC]

Oh um, to add to the
"Women should never have been aloud to vote" thing.

If women should never have been aloud to vote, than african Americans should never have been aloud to vote.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>